One of the weirdest, most nonsensical things I've ever read on these boards, it's going to be difficult to take anything you say seriously.
Well let us look at some basic biology that has been validated by the scientific method!
1. Evolution in a nutshell says some self replicating organic goo evolved via random undirected unplanned undesigned mutations preserved by natural selection to bring us to teh massive biodiversity we see today! So mutation is the only engine for biological change for natural selection to work on!
2. Through these mutations, greater complexity and constant new information was added to genomes so that the goo by chance got eyes, legs, gills, fins wings etc.etc. etc.
3. What do we observe about mutations? Well over 99.9% of all observed mutations fall on teh harmful side of the Kimera distribution scale (made famous by genetic evolutionist Mutoo Kimera). Granted the super majority are near benign. but as Dr. Wolfe Chair of the Wisconsin school of Genetics ( and an ardent evolutionist) has declared-- all mutations reduce the viability or reproductive virility of any population and ultimately reduces the population through genetic load! IOW the more mutations a population amasses- the greater the risk of extinction!
4. There are over 5,000 human conditions caused by mutations- none beneficial.
5. The theory of continual accumulation of "positive" mutations has never been observed, tested or repeated!
6. Evolutionism says that kingdom,phyla, class, order, family, genus and species all arose through mutations preserved. But the most we have ever observe happen is speciation. and most of that is simple variation of existing genetic material and not new material being added to the genome!
7. The two major experiments to prodice evolution (fruit fly & e. coli) failed to produce any thing new- they remained fruit flies and e. coli.
So yes provable testable observable biology speaks loudly against evolution.
8. Even our supposed closest relative (chimps) whom we are only 75-80% similar genetically does not prove common ancestry. Even where we are identical - we produce qualitatively different results.
If that was the case I would agree with you. Of course your parody of the methods of paleontology bares no relation to the real world.
So it is safe to say you have not bothered to look at teh debunking of so many "evolutionary fossil finds". I also take it you never heard about the massive scandal that was unocovered in the scientific peer review process.
I love basic paleontology! But when you get the indoctrinated evolutionists creating all these stories from a partial skeleton--C'mon don't you get suspicious? Have you ever read in the mags published for normal readers all teh amazing tales of life in the prehistoric eras? Some of them are more fantastic than Jurassic Park!
Where on Earth do you get these ideas?
Where? From the research without comments by either evolutionists or YEC scientists.
Dr. Kirchner from Harvard Genetic school said in a Boston Herald interview that the study of genetics and molecular biology have advanced without any regard to evolution for nearly a century! He is an evolutionist and wishes they could join them closer, but that is an outstanding claim by the chair of Harvard Genetics.
Once again - just taking the provable facts of genetic research and micro biology without either sides indoctrination, then compare the claims of both sides against what is known of genetics- Divine Creation as espoused is more supported by the truths than evolution is!
More later! I had a hard day at work. I am retiring in 18 days from the postal service after being there for almost 36 years. so my energy is limited. Will address the rest of your amazement at me in the morning!
