Subduction Zone
Regular Member
I am sorry that you cannot understand a straight forward post. Your posts are extremely disjointed and all but unreadable. In another thread you made a gross error and did not own up to it. Tell me, why should I respond to someone that will not discuss the topic properly?Hey hey @sfs
While we wait for @Speedwell to respond, lets include subs point here into our discussion.
When we consider randomness and "The Mathematics of Physics and Modern Engineering, Sokolnikov and Reheffer (1958)" - supplied by brother speedwell
In science, a random process is called random not because of the pattern or series of steps but by the outcome.
What do you think about what sub said here re random?
Also @Subduction Zone , what do you think about the definition of random process supplied by speewell, defined in that book i highlighted?
Full tet of "Mathematics Of Physics And Modern Engineering"
P622 random process defintion
"A process is random if it is impossible to predict the final state from the initial state (as, for example, in a toss of a coin or a die)" - 1958
Brother @Speedwell and brother @sfs. Subduction zone has joined our discussion. I could not have asked for things to go my way, they just seem to.
Cheers and God Bless ;,p
Upvote
0