My point doesn't fall short. I pointed out that it was a reason for oversight of all politicians.
Why the bullying on this point? Am I not allowed an opinion that I want oversight on politicians? I don't get it.
I'm beginning to get it. What if our friend is, in reality, one of those Russian citizens hired to pretend to be an American to disrupt American social media??
His passive/aggressive attempts here to defend Congressional graft and corruption would indicate an interest other than American.
Transparency has a way of keeping people honest and what @variant said.
I haven’t seen a good argument for it yet.Do you think we shouldn't do this just in case folks don't care???
It’s not impressive.The Congress can see yours.
Bullying?My point doesn't fall short. I pointed out that it was a reason for oversight of all politicians.
Why the bullying on this point? Am I not allowed an opinion that I want oversight on politicians? I don't get it.
For what it is worth, whether you see a 'good argument' or not isn't that important. If the masses see a good argument, that is important.I haven’t seen a good argument for it yet.
Yeah, the masses are alway right.For what it is worth, whether you see a 'good argument' or not isn't that important. If the masses see a good argument, that is important.
I just did.Where did anybody say that?
Why stop at tax returns then?
Where did anybody say that?
Agreed. SEC filings might be important as well.
I think the key is that this starts a conversation. It starts an ideal. A plan, if you will, to ensure that ethics are actually adhered to in our government.
I haven’t seen a good argument for it yet.
Split hairs, then.Actually, you asked a question. You didn't make a statement.