I think it's more a question of willful negligence for some, but many are just negligent out of ignorance and gullibility.It could be argued that this makes them accessories before the fact to murder.
Upvote
0
I think it's more a question of willful negligence for some, but many are just negligent out of ignorance and gullibility.It could be argued that this makes them accessories before the fact to murder.
I had the chickenpox - it was nasty.... Chickenpox was bad too. Both of my sons caught it because they didn’t have the vaccine available then . My oldest had such bad scabs from that on his feet that he was unable to walk. I don’t see why people would put their kids through these if they didn’t have to
Thank you for providing a perfect example of someone offering opinions about vaccines who has no idea what he's talking about. In the old days, measles killed 500 children every year in the US. In 1980, it killed 2.6 million people worldwide. That's a heck of of a lot of dead people for a virus that doesn't cause any problems.Measles in the old days wasn't a problem, nobody was scared of it. You get it and within a week it's over.
Lanka is not a Nobel prize winner. He's also a complete crackpot on this subject. Meanwhile, you ignore the research by the 99.99% of virologists, immunologists, and epidemiologists who have concluded that yes, viruses cause disease, and yes, vaccines prevent disease.They ignore the well researched "no agenda" science by nobel prize winners like Stefan Lanka
He lost in German court. The decision was overturned because the court decided that it was up to Lanka to decide whether the proof was sufficient or not. So no proof would ever be sufficient.(his claims have never been refuted and he won in German court to prove it)
As I said before, these are people with blood on their hands.These are people with ethical and morale values who decided at the end of the day, the truth matters more than $$$$.
But it's true! It never caused any problems.That's a heck of of a lot of dead people for a virus that doesn't cause any problems.
Thank you for providing a perfect example of someone offering opinions about vaccines who has no idea what he's talking about. In the old days, measles killed 500 children every year in the US. In 1980, it killed 2.6 million people worldwide. That's a heck of of a lot of dead people for a virus that doesn't cause any problems.
Lanka is not a Nobel prize winner. He's also a complete crackpot on this subject. Meanwhile, you ignore the research by the 99.99% of virologists, immunologists, and epidemiologists who have concluded that yes, viruses cause disease, and yes, vaccines prevent disease.
He lost in German court. The decision was overturned because the court decided that it was up to Lanka to decide whether the proof was sufficient or not. So no proof would ever be sufficient.
As I said before, these are people with blood on their hands.
Quite. You only have to look at the rising incidence of measles where the % vaccinated has dropped, to see the correlation.Also -- speaking as someone who studies viral outbreaks for a living, any biologist who thinks viruses don't cause disease is genuinely insane.
Vaccine effectiveness was estimated at 96.7% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 94.5–98.0%) for one dose and 99.7% (95% CI: 99.2–99.9%) for two doses of measles vaccine. For at least one dose, effectiveness was estimated at 98.7% (95% CI: 97.9–99.2%). Sensitivity analyses did not significantly alter the base estimates.
Here are the numbers for measles incidence in the US by year. Wanna guess when the measles vaccine was introduced?
No, it shows a massive decline in deaths from measles. Mortality for measles varies enormously, from ~0.1% to 10%, depending on how healthy and well-nourished the individual is and how well they are treated while ill. Measles mortality fell a lot in the US through the first half of the 20th century, but measles incidence hardly fell at all. Here are the incidence numbers for most of the period:Page 85. Shows the MASSIVE decline and downward trend of measles.
No, it shows a massive decline in deaths from measles. Mortality for measles varies enormously, from ~0.1% to 10%, depending on how healthy and well-nourished the individual is and how well they are treated while ill. Measles mortality fell a lot in the US through the first half of the 20th century, but measles incidence hardly fell at all. Here are the incidence numbers for most of the period:
View attachment 248163
Like I said above, people stopped DYING from measles because of better nutrition and hygiene.
So you're wrong. You were citing people who deny that measles virus causes measles, and that measles vaccine prevents measles. Those claims were wrong, and the people you're touting as truth-speakers are nuts. That's kind of important.SO what?????? Death rates from measles dropped...but people still got measles SOOOO WHAT????????
And, as I said above, that's wrong. Sorry, let me try speaking your language. That's WRONG!!!!!!!!!!!! Because even after all of those improvements in nutrition and general health, and the tremendous decline in mumps mortality, four or five hundred children per year were still dying of measles in the US. Every year. Now you may not care about a few hundred dead children, but I do, especially when those deaths are easily preventable.Like I said above, people stopped DYING from measles because of better nutrition and hygiene.
That case was to decide whether or not Lanka had to pay the individual who proved that measles is a virus. The link you provided states that it was proven without doubt that measles is a virus. Lanka is a crackpot and nobody should be listening to anything he says about viruses.Lanka won, this is the ruling by the highest court:
Urteil des 12. Zivilsenats vom 16.2.2016 - 12 U 63/15 -