Is repentance a "one time act" or is it, or should it be "a way of life" (here)...?

Aldebaran

NCC-1701-A
Christian Forums Staff
Purple Team - Moderator
Site Supporter
Oct 17, 2009
38,771
12,128
Wisconsin, United States of America
✟653,664.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
So we as Christians can join the Mexican cartels and sell drugs, steal whatever we want, force people into sex slavery, and chop off the heads of all the family members of those who oppose us including children and were still saved? Is this correct with what you believe?

You could do those things, but if a person was saved, they would be miserable and wouldn't enjoy any of it. They'd constantly have their conscience bothering them. That would be the Holy Spirit convicting them. However, if they could do all those things and never look back, then I'd have to wonder if they had ever been saved.
 
Upvote 0

Aldebaran

NCC-1701-A
Christian Forums Staff
Purple Team - Moderator
Site Supporter
Oct 17, 2009
38,771
12,128
Wisconsin, United States of America
✟653,664.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
Yeshua said that His sheep both hear His voice and obey it.

Did Yeshua ever sin?
NO, He did not!!

So, if we are hearing His voice as His sheep, how can we be sinning and it be acceptable?

The load of crap you spew you needs multiple shovels to clean up :(

Don't the shepherd's sheep ever go astray? When one does, does the shepherd let the sheep go and say, "that one wasn't one of my sheep anyway".
 
  • Like
Reactions: Neogaia777
Upvote 0

BNR32FAN

He’s a Way of life
Site Supporter
Aug 11, 2017
22,663
7,392
Dallas
✟890,003.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
You could do those things, but if a person was saved, they would be miserable and wouldn't enjoy any of it. They'd constantly have their conscience bothering them. That would be the Holy Spirit convicting them. However, if they could do all those things and never look back, then I'd have to wonder if they had ever been saved.

I’d say if a person was capable of doing this they were never truly born again to begin with.
 
Upvote 0

BNR32FAN

He’s a Way of life
Site Supporter
Aug 11, 2017
22,663
7,392
Dallas
✟890,003.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Don't the shepherd's sheep ever go astray? When one does, does the shepherd let the sheep go and say, "that one wasn't one of my sheep anyway".

What is your interpretation of John 15:1-10 my friend?
 
Upvote 0

Aldebaran

NCC-1701-A
Christian Forums Staff
Purple Team - Moderator
Site Supporter
Oct 17, 2009
38,771
12,128
Wisconsin, United States of America
✟653,664.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
I’d say if a person was capable of doing this they were never truly born again to begin with.

They would always be "capable", just as a person who has an arm and a hand is capable of punching someone in the face for no reason. But it simply wouldn't be in their heart to do so. If they did, they'd regret doing it.
 
Upvote 0

Aldebaran

NCC-1701-A
Christian Forums Staff
Purple Team - Moderator
Site Supporter
Oct 17, 2009
38,771
12,128
Wisconsin, United States of America
✟653,664.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Single
What is your interpretation of John 15:1-10 my friend?

Well, there was a parable that Jesus told that I can't seem to locate that said something similar about the branches. He went into more detail about it in that one, and it indicated that when "they gathered them", He was referring to Works being gathered and burned rather than the branches. I wish I knew where that was. I'd direct you to it.

EDIT:
Looking again, it appears to be in the same place. "6“If anyone does not abide in Me, he is thrown away as a branch and dries up; and they gather them, and cast them into the fire and they are burned."

Notice how there's a difference in HE is thrown away, and then it becomes THEY GATHER THEM. There's 2 different things being talked about here. It goes well with what Paul said starting in 1 Cor. 3:12 about how we can build upon the foundation of Christ with things like wood, hay and other burnable things, but they would be burned up, but the person himself would still be saved.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

BNR32FAN

He’s a Way of life
Site Supporter
Aug 11, 2017
22,663
7,392
Dallas
✟890,003.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Well, there was a parable that Jesus told that I can't seem to locate that said something similar about the branches. He went into more detail about it in that one, and it indicated that when "they gathered them", He was referring to Works being gathered and burned rather than the branches. I wish I knew where that was. I'd direct you to it.

EDIT:
Looking again, it appears to be in the same place. "6“If anyone does not abide in Me, he is thrown away as a branch and dries up; and they gather them, and cast them into the fire and they are burned."

Notice how there's a difference in HE is thrown away, and then it becomes THEY GATHER THEM. There's 2 different things being talked about here. It goes well with what Paul said starting in 1 Cor. 3:12 about how we can build upon the foundation of Christ with things like wood, hay and other burnable things, but they would be burned up, but the person himself would still be saved.

The Greek text does not contain the plural form.

John 15:6

6 ἐὰν (if) G1437 Conj μή (not) G3361 Adv τις (anyone) G5100 IPro-NMS μένῃ (abide) G3306 V-PSA-3S ἐν (in) G1722 Prep ἐμοί (me) G1473 PPro-D1S ἐβλήθη (thrown) G906 V-AIP-3S ἔξω (away) G1854 Adv ὡς (as) G5613 Adv τὸ (the) G3588 Art-NNS κλῆμα (branch) G2814 N-NNS καὶ (and) G2532 Conj ἐξηράνθη (dries) G3583 V-AIP-3S καὶ (and) G2532 Conj συνάγουσιν (gather) G4863 V-PIA-3P αὐτὰ (them) G846 PPro-AN3P καὶ (and) G2532 Conj εἰς (into) G1519 Prep τὸ (the) G3588 Art-ANS πῦρ (fire) G4442 N-ANS βάλλουσιν (thrown) G906 V-PIA-3P καὶ (and) G2532 Conj καίεται (burned) G2545 V-PIM/P-3S

The Greek word I highlighted in bold print is autós meaning

1) himself, herself, themselves, itself

2) he, she, it

3) the same

Since it is a pronoun it must refer to the one previously mentioned which would be referring to anyone, a man, or a certain person.

There is a distinct difference between John 15 and 1 Corinthians 3. John 15 is referring to an absence of works 1 Corinthians 3 is referring to rewards we receive according to our works. 1 Corinthians 3 is not referring to an absence of works. Notice that the builder is building on the foundation of Christ and his works will be tested by fire to show if it has any value. This is referring to a believer who is abiding and is doing works. John 15:6 is referring to someone who is not doing works.
 
Upvote 0

BNR32FAN

He’s a Way of life
Site Supporter
Aug 11, 2017
22,663
7,392
Dallas
✟890,003.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Well, there was a parable that Jesus told that I can't seem to locate that said something similar about the branches. He went into more detail about it in that one, and it indicated that when "they gathered them", He was referring to Works being gathered and burned rather than the branches. I wish I knew where that was. I'd direct you to it.

EDIT:
Looking again, it appears to be in the same place. "6“If anyone does not abide in Me, he is thrown away as a branch and dries up; and they gather them, and cast them into the fire and they are burned."

Notice how there's a difference in HE is thrown away, and then it becomes THEY GATHER THEM. There's 2 different things being talked about here. It goes well with what Paul said starting in 1 Cor. 3:12 about how we can build upon the foundation of Christ with things like wood, hay and other burnable things, but they would be burned up, but the person himself would still be saved.

Here’s my interpretation

John 15 explained in the proper context with the proper translations. So many people who believe in eternal security get way off course when they hit this stumbling block. This is because John 15:1-6 refutes the doctrine of eternal security. In order to understand this passage of scripture you have to really look at the context as well as the Greek definitions of the keys words used here. First I’ll start with the context. Who is Jesus speaking to? This message takes place right after the Last Supper. Judas has already left the upper room to go and betray Jesus and Jesus and His faithful 11 apostles are walking to Gethsemane late at night. So according to the scriptures only Jesus and His faithful 11 apostles are present during this message. So let’s examine Jesus’ message. I’m going to use the NLT version which I know many people will say is inaccurate but I will show you by the definition of the Greek words used that in this particular case the NLT is actually more accurate than the KJV,ASV,and ESV with one exception. In verse 9 the NLT adds the word “true” in front of the word “disciples”. I have removed the word “true” because it is not in the original Greek text and it is not my intention to add anything to the original text in order to support my position in this discussion. So let’s continue.


““I am the true grapevine, and my Father is the gardener. He cuts off every branch of mine that doesn’t produce fruit, and he prunes the branches that do bear fruit so they will produce even more. You have already been pruned and purified by the message I have given you. Remain in me, and I will remain in you. For a branch cannot produce fruit if it is severed from the vine, and you cannot be fruitful unless you remain in me. “Yes, I am the vine; you are the branches. Those who remain in me, and I in them, will produce much fruit. For apart from me you can do nothing. Anyone who does not remain in me is thrown away like a useless branch and withers. Such branches are gathered into a pile to be burned. But if you remain in me and my words remain in you, you may ask for anything you want, and it will be granted! When you produce much fruit, you are my disciples. This brings great glory to my Father. “I have loved you even as the Father has loved me. Remain in my love. When you obey my commandments, you remain in my love, just as I obey my Father’s commandments and remain in his love.”

John 15:1-10 NLT


First let’s examine verses 1 & 2.


““I am the true grapevine, and my Father is the gardener. He cuts off every branch of mine that doesn’t produce fruit, and he prunes the branches that do bear fruit so they will produce even more.”

John 15:1-2 NLT


The Father “cuts off” every branch “of mine” that doesn’t produce fruit. Before we look at cuts off notice Jesus says “of mine”. These branches are believers. They are already grafted into the vine. We will see more evidence of this later in my explanation. So let’s look at the full definition of the Greek word used for the term “cuts off” which is aírō (G142).


Definition

1) to raise up, elevate, lift up a) to raise from the ground, take up: stones b) to raise upwards, elevate, lift up: the hand c) to draw up: a fish

2) to take upon one's self and carry what has been raised up, to bear

3) to bear away what has been raised, carry off a) to move from its place b) to take off or away what is attached to anything c) to remove d) to carry off, carry away with one e) to appropriate what is taken f) to take away from another what is his or what is committed to him, to take by force g) to take and apply to any use h) to take from among the living, either by a natural death, or by violence i) cause to cease


Notice the bold letters in the definition. To take off or away what is attached to anything. The branch is attached to the vine. When the Greek word aírō is used in reference to something that is attached to something the correct definition is removed or detached. The term taken away is also used which still implies the same thing. If someone is taken away from the vine (Jesus) they become detached or removed from Him which cannot result in salvation. Let’s continue there’s plenty more evidence to confirm this.


“You have already been pruned and purified by the message I have given you. Remain in me, and I will remain in you. For a branch cannot produce fruit if it is severed from the vine, and you cannot be fruitful unless you remain in me.”

John 15:3-4 NLT


Here Jesus is saying to His 11 faithful apostles “remain in Me” “YOU cannot be fruitful UNLESS YOU remain in Me”. Now look at the implications here. These are very powerful words. Jesus is directing this message to His 11 faithful apostles whom we know without a doubt that Jesus knew they believed according to John 6:64. Jesus is implying that there is a possibility that they can fail to abide or remain in Him. According to the doctrine of eternal security this means Jesus is warning His apostles of doing something that is impossible for them to do. Why would Jesus warn them to abide in Him if they are incapable of falling away? Jesus knew they still have free will and they needed this message to stay the course. Notice in the first verse of the very next chapter while they are still walking to Gethsemane Jesus says to them ““These things have I spoken unto you, that ye should not be caused to stumble.”

John 16:1”. Let’s continue.


““Yes, I am the vine; you are the branches. Those who remain in me, and I in them, will produce much fruit. For apart from me you can do nothing.”

John 15:5 NLT


Two key things to focus on here. Those who remain in Jesus WILL PRODUCE MUCH FRUIT. Not might produce or may or can produce some fruit. Will produce much fruit. It is inevitable absolutely will happen of course if given the opportunity. The thief on the cross is an example of someone who didn’t have much of an opportunity to produce fruit or do good works. He did defend Jesus against the other criminals who were mocking Jesus. So he did produce some fruit but he was pretty limited considering he was nailed to a cross. But for those who have the capability to produce fruit and do not they will face the consequences of verses 2 and 6. Now the second point of focus is “apart from Me YOU can do nothing”. According to eternal security the apostles can’t be apart from Him because of 1 John 2:19.


“They went out from us, but they were not of us; for if they had been of us, they would no doubt have continued with us: but they went out, that they might be made manifest that they were not all of us.”

1 John 2:19 KJV


So how does this make sense? Very easy 1 John 2:19 is speaking of antichrists as we can see in verse 18.


“Little children, it is the last time: and as ye have heard that antichrist shall come, even now are there many antichrists; whereby we know that it is the last time.”

1 John 2:18 KJV


So what’s the difference between those who don’t abide and antichrists? Well antichrists lie and deny that Jesus is the Messiah and the Son of God and God Himself. Antichrists try to deceive people about Jesus and The Father. That’s very different from what we’re seeing here in a John 15. John 15 is about becoming lukewarm. Only believers can become lukewarm because nonbelievers were never hot with passion for Christ to begin with. 1 John 2:19 only tells us that true believers will never be antichrists. It doesn’t say that true believers cannot fail to abide in Christ. Ok let’s proceed to verse 6 in John 15.


“Anyone who does not remain in me is thrown away like a useless branch and withers. Such branches are gathered into a pile to be burned.”

John 15:6 NLT


Now many who teach the doctrine of eternal security will say this is a parallel verse to 1 Corinthians 3:15. That is not correct. In 1 Cor 3:15 Paul is taking about believers who are “building” on the foundation of Christ. They are doing works. 1 Cor 3:15 is not about believers who are not doing works. John 15:1-10 is about believers who are not doing works. Maybe they were then stopped or maybe they’re new to their faith and haven’t started. I don’t know. I don’t see any indication in the scriptures. The bottom line is they’re not doing works. In 1 Cor 3 Paul is explaining how both he and Apollos did the work God assigned them and both will be rewarded according to their deeds. Their works will be tested by fire to see if it has any value. Whether their works have any value or not the builder will still be saved either way. By having value means did it bring glory to God. I don’t want to get too far into discussing 1 Cor 3 because this is getting long and a bit off track. Anyone can clearly see it is only referring to believers who have done works. So let’s look at the Greek definition of the word bállō (G906) which is translated to cast or throw which means


1) to throw or let go of a thing without caring where it falls a) to scatter, to throw, cast into b) to give over to one's care uncertain about the result c) of fluids

1) to pour, pour into of rivers

2) to pour out

2) to put into, insert


Grammar:

a primary verb; to throw (in various applications, more or less violent or intense):--arise, cast (out), X dung, lay, lie, pour, put (up), send, strike, throw (down), thrust. Compare ῥίπτω.


Basically it means to carelessly throw down or thrust in a violent or intense manner without regard.


Next let’s look at the word wither which is translated from the Greek word xēraínō (G3583)


1) to make dry, dry up, wither

2) to become dry, to be dry, be withered a) of plants b) of the ripening of crops c) of fluids d) of the members of the body

3) to waste away, pine away, i.e. a withered hand


To dry up or waste away.


Lastly let’s look at the definition of the word burned translated from the Greek word kaíō (G2545) which means


1) to set on fire, light, burning

2) to burn, consume with fire


Pretty basic definition as you would expect.


So let’s review and put it all into perspective. So we have Jesus warning His 11 faithful apostles to abide in Him even explaining the consequences of failing to abide while the doctrine of eternal security suggests it is impossible for the faithful 11 not to abide, at least not unto the point of loss of salvation. But look at the consequences Jesus described in the proper translation. They are cut off or removed from the vine (Jesus). That in itself cannot result in salvation without repentance. They are cast or thrown away (carelessly violently intensely without regard) to wither (dry up and waste away) then thrown (again carelessly violently intensely without regard) into the fire to be burned (set on fire or consumed by fire). For anyone who questions the definitions I’ve provided for these words you can search it for yourself using the Strong’s concordance reference numbers I provided. Just google Strong’s concordance then type in the letter and number and you can see the definitions for yourself. I provided the number right after the Greek transliteration. For example search “Strong’s Concordance G142 and you’ll get the information for the Greek word aírō which means to take away, lift up, etc. If you question whether or not these are the correct Greek words in the scriptures just google John 15 Greek Interlinear and you can see the original Greek texts with translations and the Strong’s Concordance reference numbers. Here’s a link to make it easier. KJV w/ Strong's Concordance - John 15
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

servantofiam

Active Member
Dec 9, 2018
220
23
55
Colorado
✟18,811.00
Country
United States
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Divorced
If you believe the Bible is the word of God both must be correct. If we begin to question the validity of the Bible then we have absolutely nothing to base our beliefs on.



I definitely buy that the Bible is the absolute WORD of GOD!!

However, I think there is certain areas where copiers of the bible in the first few centuries who may have added to the word, or added words that meant the same thing what the original writer was intending.

Example:
We know the Book of Isaiah is 100% Hebrew/Aramaic.
And yet, there is word in Isaiah, from a language that was not yet spoken or known for almost 700 years until after the death of Isaiah.
That language is Latin Vulgate.
The word is Lucifer.
And clearly the Roman Catholics added this word to the original Hebrew, because Isaiah would have not known both this language nor this word - Lucifer.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: BNR32FAN
Upvote 0

servantofiam

Active Member
Dec 9, 2018
220
23
55
Colorado
✟18,811.00
Country
United States
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Divorced
And when Yeshua ever referenced the devil, He called him, Satan (this what they interpreted Jesus calling him at least). The original Hebrew of the Old Testament never gave him a name and always called him the "Adversary."
 
  • Informative
Reactions: BNR32FAN
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

servantofiam

Active Member
Dec 9, 2018
220
23
55
Colorado
✟18,811.00
Country
United States
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Divorced
Don't the shepherd's sheep ever go astray? When one does, does the shepherd let the sheep go and say, "that one wasn't one of my sheep anyway".




I definitely agree with this to a point. But then 2 Peter comes into effect.

2 Peter 2:

20 For if after they have escaped the pollutions of the world through the knowledge of the Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, they are again entangled therein, and overcome, the latter end is worse with them than the beginning.

21 For it had been better for them not to have known the way of righteousness, than, after they have known it, to turn from the holy commandment delivered unto them.

22 But it is happened unto them according to the true proverb, The dog is turned to his own vomit again; and the sow that was washed to her wallowing in the mire.
 
Upvote 0

BNR32FAN

He’s a Way of life
Site Supporter
Aug 11, 2017
22,663
7,392
Dallas
✟890,003.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
I definitely buy that the Bible is the absolute WORD of GOD!!

However, I think there is certain areas where copiers of the bible in the first few centuries who may have added to the word, or added words that meant the same thing what the original writer was intending.

Example:
We know the Book of Isaiah is 100% Hebrew/Aramaic.
And yet, there is word in Isaiah, from a language that was not yet spoken or known for almost 700 years until after the death of Isaiah.
That language is Latin Vulgate.
The word is Lucifer.
And clearly the Roman Catholics added this word to the original Hebrew, because Isaiah would have not known both this language nor this word - Lucifer.

I do agree that some translators did inject their beliefs into the scriptures by choosing words that better support their beliefs. I see this in John 15:2. Most translations use the term lift up or take away instead of the correct definition which would be cut off, remove, or detach. They ignored the definition pertaining to something that is attached. The branch is attached to the vine so the definition must be pertaining to something that is attached. As far as the Latin Vulgate I’ve never felt compelled to even study it. I prefer the Greek and Hebrew when I have questions.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: servantofiam
Upvote 0

servantofiam

Active Member
Dec 9, 2018
220
23
55
Colorado
✟18,811.00
Country
United States
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Divorced
I use 3 Bibles to view a scripture to see if there is something missing.

I use the KJV first
and then compare that with the CLV = Greek and CJB = Hebrew


Here is an example of something that gets clarified by doing as I do.

In another thread, the discussion was about "certain" gifts of the Holy Spirit were thought to be ended and no longer used today.

The key verse being used was from Paul:
1 Corinthians 13:
8 Charity never faileth: but whether there be prophecies, they shall fail; whether there be tongues, they shall cease; whether there be knowledge, it shall vanish away.

9 For we know in part, and we prophesy in part.

10 But when that which is perfect is come, then that which is in part shall be done away.


***clearly, they only use verse 8 for their argument and never pay attention to verse 10 that means it ends when the Second Coming happens***


But here is the point I am making. Let's look closer at verse 8:
8 Charity never faileth: but whether there be prophecies, they shall fail; whether there be tongues, they shall cease; whether there be knowledge, it shall vanish away.

The argument was based that the gift of TONGUES had already ended (like I stated, they refused verse 10 that gives them when it actually does end).

But let's use verse 8 and this topic of TONGUES. They claim this Tongues is a reference to the gift of the Holy Spirit.

***But, we must remember something here***

This is Paul writing and he always wrote in Koine Greek. So, let's see what an actual Koine Greek Bible has to say about this specific verse using the CORRECT TRANSLATION!!

8 "Love is never lapsing: yet, whether prophecies, they will be discarded, or languages, they will cease, or knowledge, it will be discarded."

If you notice, Paul was not even speaking about the gift of TONGUES, according to the proper translation, he was speaking about humanities languages.


HAHAHAHAHAHA, so many people have mis-translated this verse to shut down the gift of Tongues. How IGNORANT these people truthfully are!!




But anyways, this is why I use the 3 Bibles that I use. And of course, for the actual Old Testament, I use what Yeshua read Isaiah (no prophet have honor in His own nation) from, the TORAH!!

If the Torah was good enough for Yeshua, it has to be good enough for me!!
 
Upvote 0

BNR32FAN

He’s a Way of life
Site Supporter
Aug 11, 2017
22,663
7,392
Dallas
✟890,003.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
I use 3 Bibles to view a scripture to see if there is something missing.

I use the KJV first
and then compare that with the CLV = Greek and CJB = Hebrew


Here is an example of something that gets clarified by doing as I do.

In another thread, the discussion was about "certain" gifts of the Holy Spirit were thought to be ended and no longer used today.

The key verse being used was from Paul:
1 Corinthians 13:
8 Charity never faileth: but whether there be prophecies, they shall fail; whether there be tongues, they shall cease; whether there be knowledge, it shall vanish away.

9 For we know in part, and we prophesy in part.

10 But when that which is perfect is come, then that which is in part shall be done away.


***clearly, they only use verse 8 for their argument and never pay attention to verse 10 that means it ends when the Second Coming happens***


But here is the point I am making. Let's look closer at verse 8:
8 Charity never faileth: but whether there be prophecies, they shall fail; whether there be tongues, they shall cease; whether there be knowledge, it shall vanish away.

The argument was based that the gift of TONGUES had already ended (like I stated, they refused verse 10 that gives them when it actually does end).

But let's use verse 8 and this topic of TONGUES. They claim this Tongues is a reference to the gift of the Holy Spirit.

***But, we must remember something here***

This is Paul writing and he always wrote in Koine Greek. So, let's see what an actual Koine Greek Bible has to say about this specific verse using the CORRECT TRANSLATION!!

8 "Love is never lapsing: yet, whether prophecies, they will be discarded, or languages, they will cease, or knowledge, it will be discarded."

If you notice, Paul was not even speaking about the gift of TONGUES, according to the proper translation, he was speaking about humanities languages.


HAHAHAHAHAHA, so many people have mis-translated this verse to shut down the gift of Tongues. How IGNORANT these people truthfully are!!




But anyways, this is why I use the 3 Bibles that I use. And of course, for the actual Old Testament, I use what Yeshua read Isaiah (no prophet have honor in His own nation) from, the TORAH!!

If the Torah was good enough for Yeshua, it has to be good enough for me!!

I’m actually not 100% sure on this one. I’m not sure which definition of “distinct” Strong’s is referring to. Is it distinct meaning different from other languages or is it distinct meaning distinguishable from other languages. The word distinct having two opposing definitions is tough to figure out. I’m going to have to stay neutral on this one brother.

Charity never faileth: but whether there be prophecies, they shall fail; whether there be tongues, they shall cease; whether there be knowledge, it shall vanish away.

tongues


G1100


Lemma:

γλῶσσα


Transliteration:

glōssa


Pronounce:

gloce-sah'


Part of Speech:

Noun Feminine


Language:

greek


Description:

1) the tongue, a member of the body, an organ of speech

2) a tongue a) the language or dialect used by a particular people distinct from that of other nations
 
Upvote 0

SkyWriting

The Librarian
Site Supporter
Jan 10, 2010
37,279
8,500
Milwaukee
✟410,948.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Explain to me how it is a FREE from sin card when the 10 Commandments ARE NOT part of the Law?

Have you ever read about the contents kept inside the Ark of the Covenant?
It includes the LAW ""and the"" 10 Commandments...
The ""and the"" distinguishes that the Law and 10 Commandments are TWO SEPARATE entities.

Which means, if the Law has been fulfilled, the 10 Commandments are now the
LAW for both Jew/Gentile.

So, how is sin dead to the 10 Commandments?
If you break any of the 10 Commandments you are SINNING!!

You are in sin before you are old enough to read 8, 9, or even 10 commandments.

Psalm 51:5
Behold, I was brought forth in iniquity, and in sin did my mother conceive me.

1 John 1:8-10
If we say we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us. If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness. If we say we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is not in us.

For those with faith in Jesus:

Psalm 32:1
Blessed is he whose transgressions are forgiven, whose sins are covered!

Psalm 32:2
Blessed is the man whose sin the LORD does not count against him, in whose spirit there is no deceit.

2 Corinthians 5:19
that God was reconciling the world to Himself in Christ, not counting men's trespasses against them. And He has committed to us the message of reconciliation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Neogaia777
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

SkyWriting

The Librarian
Site Supporter
Jan 10, 2010
37,279
8,500
Milwaukee
✟410,948.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Explain to me how it is a FREE from sin card when the 10 Commandments ARE NOT part of the Law?

Let scripture explain:

Romans 4:8
Blessed is the man whose sin the Lord will never count against him."

1 Corinthians 13:5
It is not rude, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no account of wrongs.

John 1:16
From His fullness we have all received grace upon grace.

2 Corinthians 5:19
that God was reconciling the world to Himself in Christ, not counting men's trespasses against them. And He has committed to us the message of reconciliation.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Neogaia777
Upvote 0

servantofiam

Active Member
Dec 9, 2018
220
23
55
Colorado
✟18,811.00
Country
United States
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Divorced
I’m actually not 100% sure on this one. I’m not sure which definition of “distinct” Strong’s is referring to. Is it distinct meaning different from other languages or is it distinct meaning distinguishable from other languages. The word distinct having two opposing definitions is tough to figure out. I’m going to have to stay neutral on this one brother.

Charity never faileth: but whether there be prophecies, they shall fail; whether there be tongues, they shall cease; whether there be knowledge, it shall vanish away.

tongues


G1100


Lemma:

γλῶσσα


Transliteration:

glōssa


Pronounce:

gloce-sah'


Part of Speech:

Noun Feminine


Language:

greek


Description:

1) the tongue, a member of the body, an organ of speech

2) a tongue a) the language or dialect used by a particular people distinct from that of other nations



And both possibilities you have listed have nothing to do with the gift of Tongues. So obviously, those preaching that the functioning gift of the Holy Spirit called Tongues being ended (using this scripture reference), are just flat out speaking from their rectums :(

And to think of all of those churches not utilizing the full power of the Holy Spirit while assuming they are walking in victory. Just sad. When real spiritual warfare takes place, these people will be clueless how to go against the adversary and his minions. They have reduced the Holy Spirit's capabilities in their life to basically a puppet show. Just sad!!
 
Upvote 0

servantofiam

Active Member
Dec 9, 2018
220
23
55
Colorado
✟18,811.00
Country
United States
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Divorced
You are in sin before you are old enough to read 8, 9, or even 10 commandments.

Psalm 51:5
Behold, I was brought forth in iniquity, and in sin did my mother conceive me.

1 John 1:8-10
If we say we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us. If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness. If we say we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is not in us.

For those with faith in Jesus:

Psalm 32:1
Blessed is he whose transgressions are forgiven, whose sins are covered!

Psalm 32:2
Blessed is the man whose sin the LORD does not count against him, in whose spirit there is no deceit.

2 Corinthians 5:19
that God was reconciling the world to Himself in Christ, not counting men's trespasses against them. And He has committed to us the message of reconciliation.




OK.
I see you going from being born into sin.
From there, is the moment we first confess our sins and are completely forgiven.

But none of those scriptures claim if we sin after being saved those sins do not count or are automatically forgiven.

Let me read your next list of scriptures:
 
Upvote 0

servantofiam

Active Member
Dec 9, 2018
220
23
55
Colorado
✟18,811.00
Country
United States
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Divorced
Let scripture explain:

Psalm 32:2
Blessed is the man whose sin the LORD does not count against him, in whose spirit there is no deceit.

Romans 4:8
Blessed is the man whose sin the Lord will never count against him."

1 Corinthians 13:5
It is not rude, it is not self-seeking, it is not easily angered, it keeps no account of wrongs.

John 1:16
From His fullness we have all received grace upon grace.

2 Corinthians 5:19
that God was reconciling the world to Himself in Christ, not counting men's trespasses against them. And He has committed to us the message of reconciliation.



All I am seeing is the scripture backing up how when we convert...this is the current condition of our sin situation which is null and void.

But none of your scriptures prove that NEW SINS are forgiven and forgotten.

And I have provided what Peter claimed where we can be a saved convert, in the condition of ALL of those scriptures you have provided, and by sinning we can LOSE IT ALL = lose our salvation!!

2 Peter 2:
20 For if after they have escaped the pollutions of the world through the knowledge of the Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ, they are again entangled therein, and overcome, the latter end is worse with them than the beginning.

21 For it had been better for them not to have known the way of righteousness, than, after they have known it, to turn from the holy commandment delivered unto them.

22 But it is happened unto them according to the true proverb, The dog is turned to his own vomit again; and the sow that was washed to her wallowing in the mire.


Show me scriptures claiming WE CAN SIN NEW SINS and they are automatically forgiven!!
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Neogaia777

Old Soul
Site Supporter
Oct 10, 2011
23,291
5,252
45
Oregon
✟961,697.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Celibate
I don’t believe it is so much about the sin itself but the heart that sins and how we react to our sins. If we are carefree about our sins and live in willful sin out of a desire to continue in sin then we have not been born again and become a new creation. If we do not desire sin and are remorseful of our sins and do not willfully indulge in sin then we are showing signs of being born again.
Define "willful"...? And also "desire to continue in sin" also, please...?

God Bless!
 
Upvote 0