gurneyhalleck1
Reader
- Oct 15, 2008
- 19,476
- 7,488
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Eastern Orthodox
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
At some point evolutionists have to realize that evolution is a mindset with an agenda that has a conscience formed by atheism. It is not an observed phenomenon that is objectively analyzed. It has social, political, religious implications that are all part of an agenda. It boggles my mind how one can be Orthodox and NOT see these factors? And the idea of the faith being subordinate to atheist agendas should be spooky....
In addition to what Fr Matt has said, your comment here indicates that you really have not grasped the point that any number of people living today could have an opinion that contradicts that “slam-dunk”, but that the determining voice of truth is not the number of people living in one particular era, above all, the present one, who think a certain way, but the very large number of dead and declared saints.
You have to decide whether you are so fully committed to the idea of evolution that you would abandon everything else for it. It matters not that you think you can synthesize them and don’t have to abandon anything. What matters is that IF what we are saying really IS the case, would you deny the historic consensus for the sake of your faith in modern science and modern education? Which would you choose in such an event?
My own choice is not difficult. Having seen the disastrous failures of said education, I have no trouble accepting a consensus that contradicts that education, not being bound to it as an article of faith.
Upvote
0