• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Status
Not open for further replies.

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
41,925
45,041
Los Angeles Area
✟1,003,305.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
As I said, not my point. Good bye.

Look, I get that your post is apparently not even about Alex Jones and am willing to forgive your off-topic rant, but what you wrote was about "the efforts of one political party to win the next presidential election by preventing the exercise of free speech".

Since it's off-topic here, maybe you can make a new thread where you can elaborate your peculiar theories about the applicability of the First Amendment to political parties.
 
  • Like
Reactions: whatbogsends
Upvote 0

SkyWriting

The Librarian
Site Supporter
Jan 10, 2010
37,281
8,501
Milwaukee
✟411,038.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
The campaign to shut up people who are not politically correct has been ongoing for some time now, and this is simply the latest development in that movement (which was demonstrated when Facebook, Spotify, You Tube and other social media discovered on the same day (!) that this one outlet fails to meet their standards and so must go).

Private companies are considered "persons" and may control their own media.
They now can voice political speech as well.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: whatbogsends
Upvote 0

SkyWriting

The Librarian
Site Supporter
Jan 10, 2010
37,281
8,501
Milwaukee
✟411,038.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Whether or not you like him, it should be clear that Alex Jones has the right to post the content that he posts.
Only on any platforms that approve his message.
Even public space like my local park has regulations
about how the space can be used.
 
Upvote 0

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,127
33,262
✟583,992.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Since it's off-topic here, maybe you can make a new thread where you can elaborate your peculiar theories about the applicability of the First Amendment to political parties.
I could...if I held such theories. :rolleyes:
 
Upvote 0

SkyWriting

The Librarian
Site Supporter
Jan 10, 2010
37,281
8,501
Milwaukee
✟411,038.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Upvote 0

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,127
33,262
✟583,992.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
So shutting down Alex Jones is sort of a Dem party project?

I dont see the other party coming to his rescue.
Google Senator Chris Murphy and include the words Alex Jones, or something like that, and see what you get (from that spokesman for the Democrat Party.
 
Upvote 0

durangodawood

re Member
Aug 28, 2007
27,413
19,109
Colorado
✟527,162.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Single
Google Senator Chris Murphy and include the words Alex Jones, or something like that, and see what you get (from that spokesman for the Democrat Party.
I dont fault anyone for speaking out against Alex Jones. It's a normal sane human response.
 
Upvote 0

DaisyDay

I Did Nothing Wrong!! ~~Team Deep State
Jan 7, 2003
41,629
19,715
Finger Lakes
✟304,678.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Google Senator Chris Murphy and include the words Alex Jones, or something like that, and see what you get (from that spokesman for the Democrat Party.
What makes him the spokesman for the Democrat [sic] Party?
 
Upvote 0

ananda

Early Buddhist
May 6, 2011
14,757
2,123
Soujourner on Earth
✟193,871.00
Marital Status
Private
YouTube, Facebook, Spotify and Apple apparently decided it was a good idea to remove content associated with InfoWars and its founder Alex Jones. This is just one of many crimes of the regressive left. Whether or not you like him, it should be clear that Alex Jones has the right to post the content that he posts.

In context of the united States: IMO any non-Publically funded company should have the right to exclude or include anyone they wish to in their private domain, just like private individuals. If they receive any Public funds at all, then I expect them to uphold First Amendments rights.
 
  • Useful
Reactions: Hank77
Upvote 0

DaisyDay

I Did Nothing Wrong!! ~~Team Deep State
Jan 7, 2003
41,629
19,715
Finger Lakes
✟304,678.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
The campaign to shut up people who are not politically correct has been ongoing for some time now, and this is simply the latest development in that movement (which was demonstrated when Facebook, Spotify, You Tube and other social media discovered on the same day (!) that this one outlet fails to meet their standards and so must go).
Do you make a distinction between "not politically correct" and out and out fake news and conspiracy mongering such as promoting Pizzagate and the Sandy Hook massacre being a hoax?
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hank77
Upvote 0

CRAZY_CAT_WOMAN

My dad died 1/12/2023. I'm still devastated.
Jul 1, 2007
17,814
5,435
Native Land
✟388,970.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
My grandpa was Republican. He would have never been okay with hate speech . When did the Republicans start favoring hate speech? Or is the right or Conservative Christians different from Republican.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.