Wherein I catch a professional YEC in a lie

[Speedwell]

At bottom, what is hard for them to grasp is why we prefer the provisional truth of science to the absolute truth of their Bible.

 

[FrumiousBandersnatch]

I don't know why this is so hard for them to grasp. They just can't seem to grasp that things are never proven not by what we know now, but by what we might know in the future.

I can understand someone not grasping a concept, but to insist their own personal definitions of well-defined terms are right, is pretty much bang on the mark of what Dunning & Kruger explained.

 

[tas8831]

Originally evolution included the origin of life.

This is spectacularly incorrect.

When they had no answer that didn't people smile they abandoned. Have you never heard of the primordial ooze?

Have you ever heard of the dust of the ground?

 

[tas8831]

Of course not.

Can as true Christian vote for someone who lied to the parents over the casket of their dead son killed at Bengazi?

Who lied over a casket? Oh, right - you watch Fox. Never mind...

 

[Jimmy D]

Who lied over a casket? Oh, right - you watch Fox. Never mind...

I thought you'd been banned or something .

In your absence you've missed the spectacularly $%*£& posts from Omega2xx, a word to the wise, ignore him wherever possible, or be prepared to answer insightful posts like "Prove natural selection to me!" and "evolutionists don't understand the Law of Genetics".

You've been warned.

 

[mark kennedy]

I thought you'd been banned or something .

In your absence you've missed the spectacularly $%*£& posts from Omega2xx, a word to the wise, ignore him wherever possible, or be prepared to answer insightful posts like "Prove natural selection to me!" and "evolutionists don't understand the Law of Genetics".

You've been warned.

There's a law of genetics? I know there are Mendelian laws of inheritance but that's a new one on me.

 

[Jimmy D]

There's a law of genetics? I know there are Mendelian laws of inheritance but that's a new one on me.

I think it's a new one to most of us.

 

[omega2xx]

Who lied over a casket? Oh, right - you watch Fox. Never mind...

Answer the question. CNN, (Clinton News Network),was probably embarrassed to report it.

 

[omega2xx]

This is spectacularly incorrect.

Not so. Originally evolution taught life originated our of the primordial soup. Of course they didn't say how the soup originated.

Have you ever heard of the dust of the ground?

What a silly question.

 

[Skreeper]

Originally evolution taught life originated our of the primordial soup.

You got a source for that?

 

[omega2xx]

You got a source for that?

Sure. Goggle "primordial soup."

If you ever paid for dance lessons, I know a good lawyer who can get your money back.

 

[Skreeper]

If you ever paid for dance lessons, I know a good lawyer who can get your money back.

I see you didn't watch the Super Bowl. It's a Tide ad.

 

[tas8831]

Answer the question. CNN, (Clinton News Network),was probably embarrassed to report it.

And Fox is more than happy to fabricate.

 

[tas8831]

Not so. Originally evolution taught life originated our of the primordial soup. Of course they didn't say how the soup originated.

No, it is a fabrication. 'Evolution' never taught anything about the origin of life.

You cannot support that standard misrepresentation, I am sure of that.

Have you ever heard of the dust of the ground?

What a silly question.

Why? Because to answer would be embarrassing for you?

 

[tas8831]

I thought you'd been banned or something .

LOL!

No, not yet. Just took a break. I had actual work to attend to!

In your absence you've missed the spectacularly $%*£& posts from Omega2xx, a word to the wise, ignore him wherever possible, or be prepared to answer insightful posts like "Prove natural selection to me!" and "evolutionists don't understand the Law of Genetics".

You've been warned.

Ah, the old "Law of Genetics". I suppose that one is adhered to by those that follow the teachings of Dunning and Kruger...

 

[omega2xx]

No, it is a fabrication. 'Evolution' never taught anything about the origin of life.

You cannot support that standard misrepresentation, I am sure of that.

Did you goggle "primordial soup?" Evolution originally said lie began with a single cell. They originally called it simple cell, but when DNA was discovered, they had to walk that error back.

Common descent, a non-provable doctrine of evolution, requires a life fcorfm to be the beginning of life. So hey still teach itg.

Why? Because to answer would be embarrassing for you?

Why? You can't prove anything you say about any doctrine of the TOE.

 

[omega2xx]

And Fox is more than happy to fabricate.

Clinton lying to the parents over the casket of one killed in Bengazzi is on tape. If you watched the fair and balanced network, you would have to admit it.

 

[Speedwell]

Clinton lying to the parents over the casket of one killed in Bengazzi is on tape. If you watched the fair and balanced network, you would have to admit it.

LOL!

 

[DogmaHunter]

You can't show one example of a mutation causing a change of species.

Maybe, just maybe, the reason for that is that in evolution theory, speciation isn't the result of a single mutation?

If you would actually take the time to learn what evolution theory is all about, perhaps you would have known that.

Mutation do make changes in the offspring, but they are not small and are usually harmful.

Actually.... usually they are neutral. Ever heared of the "mutation rate" of a species? It's how many mutations every newborn has on average. In humans, it is about 50-ish.

If usually mutations are harmfull, then the majority of these 50-ish mutations in every single human should be harmfull.

It should be rather obvious to you now, that that can not be a correct statement.

Evidently you do not understand that time will not change proven scientific laws.

What laws?

 

[DogmaHunter]

As usual nothing in your post included HOW is happened. Rhetoric is not evidence. Notrhing in you post can be proved.

The "how" of evolution is rather simple, really:

1. reproduce and pass on genes
2. mutate
3. survive
4. repeat