Can you not see how absurd this argument is? Three ridiculous speculations which clearly ignores the context of what Origen wrote. "if 'also' refers to something else,""what is the other thing that may leap" and "life perhaps."
"(18) For, as there, the bridegroom leaps upon souls that are more noble-natured and divine, called mountains, and skips upon the inferior ones called hills, so here the fountain that appears in the one who drinks of the water that Jesus gives leaps into eternal life.
(19) And after eternal life, perhaps it will also leap into the Father who is beyond eternal life. For Christ is life; but he who is greater than Christ is greater
than life.
There is only one something said to leap i.e. the fountain, para. 18. A second something cannot perhaps also leap into the father unless there was a first something which already leaped into the father. Where does Origen say or imply that there was another thing which leaped into the father before para. 19?
The fountain is what? The fountain of life. And it is in believers. So if the fountain of life leaps, what does that imply about believers in whom this fountain dwells?
John 7:38-39
"He who believes in Me, as the Scripture said, 'From his innermost being will flow rivers of LIVING water.'" But this He spoke of the Spirit, whom those who believed in Him were to receive; for the Spirit was not yet given, because Jesus was not yet glorified.
John 4:14
but whoever drinks of the water that I will give him shall never thirst; but the water that I will give him will become in him a well of water springing up to aionion LIFE."
Revelation 22:1-2
Then he showed me a river of the water of LIFE, clear as crystal, coming from the throne of God and of the Lamb, in the middle of its street On either side of the river was the tree of life, bearing twelve kinds of fruit, yielding its fruit every month; and the leaves of the tree were for the healing of the nations.
Why would Origen speak of such nonsense as an inanimate fountain leaping "after eternal life" into "the Father who is beyond eternal life"? In context Origen is speaking about "life":
(19) "And after eternal life, perhaps it will also leap into the Father who is beyond eternal life. For Christ is life but he who is greater than Christ is greater than life."
Origen is referring to the passage in
John 4 about a fountain (i.e. well) of life (v.14). After speaking of "after eternal life" & "beyond eternal life", Origen refers back to the same sentence with those phrases by 2 more references to "life" in section 19. The word "For" indicates he is referring back to what he just spoke about in the first half of section 19:
(19) And after eternal life, perhaps it will also leap into the Father who is beyond eternal life. For Christ is life but he who is greater than Christ is greater than life.
Origen speaks of "after eternal life" & "beyond eternal life". Clearly the translation "eternal" is wrong & the word for it, AIONIOS, is of finite duration. Compare Mt.25:46 as per the OP of this thread, where the same word is deceptively translated by KJV & its HellFire Boys Club clones.
https://www.tentmaker.org/books/hope_beyond_hell.pdf