Hello, for this line of reasoning to be valid, I mean logically valid, you need a working definition of your subject and a different set of criteria, or at the least different terminology. Speaking about the ´bigness´of God or of his love being ´unmeasurable´ or of his ´parts´ is speaking figuratively, that´s your starting point. If you take those terms to mean that God has actual physical size, or that there is some sort of unit for measuring the volume of God´s love, or that his love is a ´part´of him in the sense of a physical part like an elbow or a finger, then your working definitions of God, and of love, don´t describe the God of the bible or give a satisfying definition of love. First of all, God is spirit - we don´t really have an adequate way of describing what that means, well not one I´m aware of in any case. In answer to Moses saying ´who shall I say sent me´God says ´I am´. I take this to mean an absolute expression of existence, absolute in the sense of being beyond terms of reference like size, time etc. He exists in a way that we cannot understand because he is outside of all of our terms of reference, we say that he is spirit but what do we mean by that? He is not bound by time, or physical size, or any other dimensions. There are no limits to his existential nature - he is a full and complete expression of who he is, and his existence is absolute. Secondly, God´s love is not part of him, it is an expression of who he is, in the same absolute way that he simply ´is´. We can talk about God´s love or God´s justice as being ´parts of him´, but that´s figurative language, it´s not using language used to describe something physical. He´s not made of lego, with parts than can be taken off and measured. Lastly you need to define what you mean by ´measure´. Love does not have physical dimensions. For instance, I can say ´I love my dog´, and, if you were curious, you might ask ok how much do you love your dog - so how would you measure that? Well, you can´t, because there isn´t a unit of measure for love, because love does not have properties that make it measurable, in the sense of defining its size or volume. You can however find out what the limits of that love are by testing the expression of it, you could ask me for example would you do this or that for your dog and so on, to get some idea of how far my willingness to do things for my dog can give you an impression of how my love for my dog is expressed and so what are the limits of my love for my dog. You could then say, if you wanted to use archaic language, that you ´have the measure´ of my love for my dog, i.e. that you have tested it and have some notion of how it is expressed, but you can´t really say in modern English that you have measured it if you want to be accurate about what you are saying. So, again if you want to pursue this argument you need to rethink your understanding of your subject and the terminology you´re using.