A thread on evolution

Status
Not open for further replies.

Subduction Zone

Regular Member
Dec 17, 2012
32,628
12,068
✟230,461.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Upvote 0

VirOptimus

A nihilist who cares.
Aug 24, 2005
6,814
4,421
53
✟250,677.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Upvote 0

majj27

Mr. Owl has had quite enough
Jun 2, 2014
2,120
2,835
✟82,705.00
Country
United States
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
see my last post, i already refuted this.

No, you didn't. You stated an unsupported rebuttal which consisted of "The taxonomic classification Hominidae is not taxonomy."

Basically, you said "Nuh-uh" and left it at that.
 
Upvote 0

createdtoworship

In the grip of grace
Mar 13, 2004
18,941
1,758
West Coast USA
✟33,173.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
There was no flaming. Except perhaps by you. You keep making a rather HUGE error.
like I said, I was giving grace but now will report your flames. It seems to be working, you haven't flamed in last few posts.
 
Upvote 0

createdtoworship

In the grip of grace
Mar 13, 2004
18,941
1,758
West Coast USA
✟33,173.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Do you even know what peer-review is and what it entails?

Because this is not it.
why don't you define it for me, and use peer review. So your circular argument will feel fulfilled.
 
Upvote 0

Subduction Zone

Regular Member
Dec 17, 2012
32,628
12,068
✟230,461.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
so do you have any peer review that prove missing links of two genra of animals? I didn't think you would. So my question as yet to be answered. I guess I am the undefeated champion? I don't want to toot my own horn but that is pretty impressive. now I will retreat into my humble abode. I just wanted to point out that you guys still can't answer a basic question about evolution and provide proof. with peer review.
You still do not understand the phrase "peer review" or how to use it.
 
Upvote 0

createdtoworship

In the grip of grace
Mar 13, 2004
18,941
1,758
West Coast USA
✟33,173.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Do you even know what peer-review is and what it entails?

Because this is not it.

so do you have any peer review that prove missing links of two genra of animals? I didn't think you would. So my question as yet to be answered. I guess I am the undefeated champion? I don't want to toot my own horn but that is pretty impressive. now I will retreat into my humble abode. I just wanted to point out that you guys still can't answer a basic question about evolution and provide proof. with peer review. lol.:wave::wave::wave::wave::wave::wave::wave::wave:
 
Upvote 0

createdtoworship

In the grip of grace
Mar 13, 2004
18,941
1,758
West Coast USA
✟33,173.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
You still do not understand the phrase "peer review" or how to use it.

so do you have any peer review that prove missing links of two genra of animals? I didn't think you would. So my question as yet to be answered. I guess I am the undefeated champion? I don't want to toot my own horn but that is pretty impressive. now I will retreat into my humble abode. I just wanted to point out that you guys still can't answer a basic question about evolution and provide proof. with peer review. lol.:wave::wave::wave::wave::wave::wave::wave::wave:
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

majj27

Mr. Owl has had quite enough
Jun 2, 2014
2,120
2,835
✟82,705.00
Country
United States
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
so do you have any peer review that prove missing links of two genra of animals? I didn't think you would. So my question as yet to be answered.

Gradyll, that's a misuse of the term peer-review. Scientists don't submit "Peer Reviews" like they were papers or reports. Peer-review isn't a supporting publication. It means to evaluate a scientific (or professional) work by other who are in the same field of study. It's a process, not an item.
 
Upvote 0

Subduction Zone

Regular Member
Dec 17, 2012
32,628
12,068
✟230,461.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
so do you have any peer review that prove missing links of two genra of animals? I didn't think you would. So my question as yet to be answered. I guess I am the undefeated champion? I don't want to toot my own horn but that is pretty impressive. now I will retreat into my humble abode. I just wanted to point out that you guys still can't answer a basic question about evolution and provide proof. with peer review. lol.:wave::wave::wave::wave::wave::wave::wave::wave:

Once again, you do not understand the phrase that you keep abusing.

Your question was answered. You merely did not like and denied the answer since you had no response for it.

And you really need to learn what "peer review" is.
 
Upvote 0

Subduction Zone

Regular Member
Dec 17, 2012
32,628
12,068
✟230,461.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Gradyll, that's a misuse of the term peer-review. Scientists don't submit "Peer Reviews" like they were papers or reports. Peer-review isn't a supporting publication. It means to evaluate a scientific (or professional) work by other who are in the same field of study. It's a process, not an item.


Aww, how is he going to learn if he does not realize that he needs to ask questions?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

bhsmte

Newbie
Apr 26, 2013
52,761
11,796
✟247,431.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Upvote 0

createdtoworship

In the grip of grace
Mar 13, 2004
18,941
1,758
West Coast USA
✟33,173.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Gradyll, that's a misuse of the term peer-review. Scientists don't submit "Peer Reviews" like they were papers or reports. Peer-review isn't a supporting publication. It means to evaluate a scientific (or professional) work by other who are in the same field of study. It's a process, not an item.
I know this already, thanks though.
 
Upvote 0

createdtoworship

In the grip of grace
Mar 13, 2004
18,941
1,758
West Coast USA
✟33,173.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Once again, you do not understand the phrase that you keep abusing.

Your question was answered. You merely did not like and denied the answer since you had no response for it.

And you really need to learn what "peer review" is.
you have not even provided a single peer review, so sorry if I don't believe your posts anymore. Just an empty text wall with no substance.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums
Status
Not open for further replies.