you have not even provided a single peer review, so sorry if I don't believe your posts anymore. Just an empty text wall with no substance.
Not even ten seconds in and your error was made obvious. Or did you miss it?Ill help you guys out with a little you tube for you, this is what peer review:
I like your definitions yeah. first quote mine, then hominid, then peer review. I have had a history refuting your definitions, so go ahead and attempt yet another one.Not even ten seconds in and your error was made obvious. Or did you miss it?
Pure nonsense. Along with using a phrase that he still does not know how to use correctly.further more if evolution hasn't happened on a macro level which i have proven (since no one here has given peer review to support their missing links), then it is no observed, if it is not observed then it's not science. So really this is just an unfounded scientific theory. A theory is not science because it has not been tested and observed.
Once again, please no false stories. You have never refuted any of my posts.I like your definitions yeah. first quote mine, then hominid, then peer review. I have had a history refuting your definitions, so go ahead and attempt yet another one.
text wall, no substance. I am starting to think of you as a troll now.Neither have you. And you claimed to understand majj27's post. It appears that you did not.
your word against a guy on a peer review journal for 25 years....huh.Once again, please no false stories. You have never refuted any of my posts.
You made a gross error. You posted a video that pointed out your gross error to you in the first ten seconds.
I guess when you are wrong you need to find some way to run away from the issues.
text wall, no substance. I am starting to think of you as a troll now.
your word against a guy on a peer review journal for 25 years....huh.
lets see, no competition man.
your just fooling yourself now.
When do you believe this took place? I always wonder if people have a wonky timeline figured out in their minds that goes against all of science and history, or if they just don't care.
I will check back in a while and see if you guys have posted any peer reviews. Since the burden of proof is on you anyhow to answer the question. Until then ...we...are....the....champions. ha ha.
go back to the school room i guess.
We are carbon based lifeforms, and you won't get that from earth, which is mostly composed of silicon compounds.
I'm looking for a range of years. Your best estimate, however wide it may be.Adam was made the 3rd Day, which was the SAME Day/Age when the big bang of our Cosmos happened.
Ok, that's a start. You believe there were only one or two humans in 10,000 BCE?He lived in a perfect body, like God's, until some 12k years ago
Adam was made the 3rd Day, which was the SAME Day/Age when the big bang of our Cosmos happened. Gen 2:4-7 Since the first Stars lit up less than a Billion years after the big bang, on the 4th Day Gen 1:16, Adam was alive before the beginning of our Cosmos. He lived in a perfect body, like God's, until some 12k years ago, in man's time BEFORE he disobeyed and became flesh. When the Ark arrived on our Planet, Adam's superior intelligence was Inherited by the prehistoric people who were here when the Ark arrived. That's God's Truth Scripturally, Scientifically and Historically. God Bless you
We are all Stardust from the innerds of the first Stars, which lit up on the 4th Day Gen 1:16 some 13.8 billion years ago, in man's time. Jesus took some of the air, dust and water, God had created in the beginning, and "inflated it" and it became our Cosmos. Gen 2:4 He also made the 3rd Heaven of ll Cor 12:2.
Correction: The last universal common ancestor was created and brought forth from WATER on the 5th Day Gen 1:21 which was some 3.8 billion years ago in man's time. Each of God's Days/Ages is some 4.5 Billion years in man's time. That's God's literal Truth of Genesis. God Bless you