I wasn't saying that. We are all guilty because we are all sinners, while Christ has taken punishment for all who are saved.
That’s another subject for a later date.
I think that Jesus, from cross, pleaded for people of all times, and said that people of all times don't know what they are doing. Including you and me. I don't think God's words are limited to one narrow context, to the exclusion of all others.
Having said that, even if Jesus is pleading for each and every person who ever lived and will live, which certainly isn't exclusive reading of those words in larger context, that doesn't mean that His plea is fulfilled, as is evident from rest of the Bible. Jesus prayed three times: "My Father, if it is possible, may this cup be taken from me." But even though Jesus, the Son of God, prayed three times, God the Father didn't took a cup of crucifixion from Jesus. Jesus is praying, but God the Father is performing His will. After Jesus gets to perform judgement, though, we can read in Revelation what kind of judgements Jesus pours down on earth.
Ultimately, Jesus is performing the will of God the Father. "For I have come down from Heaven not to do my will but to do the will of Him who sent me." (John 6:38)
You say: “…that doesn't mean that His plea is fulfilled, as is evident from rest of the Bible.” And use to support the idea that God does not have to fulfill Christ’s pray (plea) request with: Christ pray in the garden not being fulfilled and quote scripture as saying: "My Father, if it is possible, may this cup be taken from me." Was not fulfilled. But there is a huge difference between the two requests which is missed when; you cut part of Jesus garden pray out: He prayed: “Abba, Father,” he said, “everything is possible for you. Take this cup from me. Yet not what I will,
but what you will.” The “but” makes it contingent on it being God’s will which it was not. In Christ pray to forgive all those involve in the crucifixion there is no “but” and Jesus and God being one makes it certain to be fulfilled. To cut out “Yet not as I will, but as you will.” Seems to be very misleading.
We only have this one line of at least an hour long garden pray and it is repeated by Christ showing its importance, but since this is all we have it really must be for us to hear and know (which I see extremely important). As Jesus said “everything is possible for you.” So why is it impossible for God to do His part in forgiving of everyone involved in the cross and not possible to keep Jesus from going to the cross?
I think your answer is completely disingenuous. A lot of people don't believe that Heaven and hell even exist. So they absolutely don't care for hell, nor are they afraid of it, since they don't believe in it one bit. If they were convinced that other realm, as explained through the Bible, exists, I am sure many many more people would be saved. If free will is reality, that is. After said tour, many would be open to find a way to accept and have Godly type Love, as you say. That's no "shotgun wedding" type of situation, it's providing people with full disclosure so that during their life on earth they can work out their faith and heart, or not, if they choose so on their free will.
You have some chutzpah to write that in "free will universe" tour of Heaven and hell would have no effect on one's faith and decision to clean his or her heart and accept God.
"You don't understand", like similar "you don't study the Bible", are just empty insults. Atheists, by the way, like to use "you don't understand" when they argue about evolution and stuff.
In Isaiah 43 God says: "Bring my sons from afar, and my daughters from the ends of the earth, everyone who is called by my name, whom I created for my glory, whom I formed and made.”
As far as Bible reveals, purpose for human is to glorify God. But some humans glorify God by being set up as "vessels prepared for destruction":
"Does not the potter have the right to make from the same lump of clay one vessel for special occasions and another for common use? What if God, intending to show His wrath and make His power known, bore with great patience the vessels of His wrath, prepared for destruction? What if He did this to make the riches of His glory known to the vessels of His mercy, whom He prepared in advance for glory—including us, whom He has called not only from the Jews, but also from the Gentiles?" (Romans 9:21-24)
Do you really think even one person given a tour of heaven and hell prior to ever sinning would keep from ever sinning and if they are going to sin even once what value would it have for them over what we have today?
If I gave you a tour of hell and said: “Now, Love me or you spend eternity in hell, what kind of ‘love’ would you have for me”?
Could I trust the sincerity of your Love after showing you heaven and hell and saying: “Love me in heaven or spend eternity in hell”?
Would this reward punishment motivation be the kind of “love” you would want from your spouse?
Is God’s Love some knee jerk reaction for Him or is it a free will thought-out decision He has made with alternatives?
To say: “some better method is out there” is also say: “What we have now designed by God is poorly designed to meet the objective”.
The conclusion is: “this world is actually the very best designed world to accomplish the objective”, so what is the objective?
You say: “As far as Bible reveals, purpose for human is to glorify God. But some humans glorify God by being set up as "vessels prepared for destruction"
(If we go on I will give you a full explanation of Romans 9, but for now let us understand potters in the first century did not make clay pigeons to be shot down, everything that left the potter’s shop had his mark on it some made for a common purpose and others made for a special purpose (Paul uses a very similar analogy with the same exact words in 2 Tim 2: 20. But there Paul also points out the common vessel can become an honored vessel.))
Since this world was made by God it is just as glorious as heaven, but only in the fact it is the very best place for what it was designed to do. Humans, who fail to fulfill their earthly objective do not bring glory to God, but can help other willing individuals to fulfill their objective, as Paul said: “…he did this to make the riches of his glory known
to the objects of his mercy, whom he prepared in advance for glory.
The only way this messed up world we live in today is glorious as compared to the glorious Garden of Eden is the fact it is the best situation to help willing individuals fulfill their earthly objective and really the only place where mature adult humans can fulfill their objective. Adam and Eve as our best all human representatives did not (and really could not) fulfill their earthly objective in the Garden scenario, but outside the Garden after sinning they certainly could. Would you prefer to be in a place where your eternal close relationship with God was dependent on your personal ability to obey God (the Garden) or in a place where your eternal close relationship with God is dependent on your just accepting His charity (where you are today)? Do not get me wrong it is not easy to humbly accept needed charity (like the prodigal son did), but being a poor beggar wanting charity is not a work, by the first century definition of work.
People talk about: “The lack of knowledge is the problem”, thus you bring up giving everyone a tour of heaven and hell, but “knowledge” can puff up the person (providing the opposite of humility which is what they really need to accept pure charity). If the knowledge a person gains seems to provide a solution than the pursuit of more knowledge becomes the objective (you might ask Eve about this). The lowliest mature adult on earth can place his trust (faith) in a benevolent Creator, so your believing in God is a humbling activity, but that humility it what we need to accept God’s charity.
This seems to answer most of your issues, but if it does not please re-ask the question.