Yes, I know, they have objects in the universe magically increasing in distance away from one another but not increasing in actual velocity
Simply their excuse to keep belief in cosmological redshift alive after technology falsified their belief, so the changed it to magical expanding nothing.
And yet a boat on a river that was increasing in speed, would still be accelerating, even if it was motionless in relation to the water itself. So if cosmological redshift does not equal velocity and distance, then their is no reason to assume those galaxies are at the claimed distance based on redshift values, now is there? I'm sorry, but they can't have it both ways.....
Or that they simply refused to look for another cause once technology falsified their belief that redshift was velocity and distance before they changed it to magical expanding nothing?
I see no reason to accept ad hoc theory when actual physics will do.
A New Non-Doppler Redshift
And yet I refuse to believe in magic expansion of nothing. They want galaxies to be increasing in distance at an accelerating rate, but not increasing in velocity. Unless you can show me the expansion of space in a laboratory, I see no reason to accept magical expanding nothing that would violate every known physical law including conservation of energy. Not only must energy be increasing, but nothing (space) must be being created as well. I don't buy into their stop gap excuse of illogic, see reference above.
Ever ask yourself why 96% of their cosmology is non detectable ad hoc fluff filler to make the numbers add up?