• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

How EXACTLY did the Russians sway the election.

LivingWordUnity

Unchanging Deposit of Faith, Traditional Catholic
May 10, 2007
24,497
11,193
✟228,286.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Maybe Putin hacked the opinion polls in PA, WI, and MI, in order to instill a false sense of security in Clinton? Maybe they weren't getting all Americans voters, but like 5% secret Russian agents posing as Clinton voters.
You're joking, right? A lot of polls were wrong because they were being run by liberals who wanted Hillary Clinton to win and wanted Donald Trump to lose, so that bias was reflected in their polls. And Trump won the states he did because he spent a lot more time campaigning there than Clinton did. Obama even said that about it.

Link:
Since Conventions: Trump Has Had 337,995 at Rallies – Hillary Has Had 13,970 (Sep 30th, 2016)
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

lasthero

Newbie
Jul 30, 2013
11,421
5,795
✟236,977.00
Faith
Seeker
Upvote 0

LivingWordUnity

Unchanging Deposit of Faith, Traditional Catholic
May 10, 2007
24,497
11,193
✟228,286.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Do liberals run Fox News? Because even they had her up prior to the election.

RealClearPolitics - Election 2016 - General Election: Trump vs. Clinton vs. Johnson vs. Stein
Actually, Fox News has liberals who work there. I noticed that Fox News wasn't always supporting Trump. Sometimes they were against him. And one should consider the following:

"When have we ever seen a single individual who has so defied expectations, broken the rules, violated norms, beaten not one but two political parties on the way to winning an election that he entered with 100 to 1 odds against him? I don't think that we have ever seen one person operating in such an unconventional way have an impact on the events of the year." - Nancy Gibbs, TIME magazine
.
 
Upvote 0

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,117
34,056
Texas
✟199,236.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Upvote 0

redleghunter

Thank You Jesus!
Site Supporter
Mar 18, 2014
38,117
34,056
Texas
✟199,236.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
So where were the non-biased polls that showed Trump winning?
The LA Times ran a different methodology and had Trump slightly ahead or within the margin.

However no poll that I know of except outliers had him up in PA, MI and none in WI.
 
Upvote 0

AirPo

with a Touch of Grey
Oct 31, 2003
26,363
7,214
62
✟184,357.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Clinton didn't lose the election because of the Russians. She lost because she can't be trusted and is corrupt. This is my opinion.
No, she lost the election because millions of people bought into the Russian propaganda that Clinton can't be trusted and is corrupt. At least any more than Trump is. Now the US is a communist country.
 
Upvote 0

Vylo

Stick with the King!
Aug 3, 2003
24,768
7,823
44
New Jersey
✟212,969.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
No, she lost the election because millions of people bought into the Russian propaganda that Clinton can't be trusted and is corrupt. At least any more than Trump is. Now the US is a communist country.
I don't think it was so much propaganda as proof of her corruption, though little if anything was jawdropping. Trump has been more corrupt and he isn't even in office yet.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Fireinfolding
Upvote 0

mark46

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 29, 2010
20,686
5,036
✟1,018,621.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
One can choose to believe that not one vote was changed by the release of information given to various sources by those paid or directed by the Russian government. After all, the leaks had no effect on any voters.

One can also choose to believe that US did not land on the moon.

We can never know the result of voting by state if there had been no release of Russian-procured information.
 
Upvote 0

nChrist

AKA: Tom - Saved By Grace Through Faith
Site Supporter
Mar 21, 2003
21,119
17,842
Oklahoma, USA
✟924,660.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
No, she lost the election because millions of people bought into the Russian propaganda that Clinton can't be trusted and is corrupt. At least any more than Trump is. Now the US is a communist country.

What Russian propaganda? Are you saying that the emails released were fabricated by the Russians? I'm beginning to think that the Russians had nothing to do with this at all. There is information that a DNC insider released the emails to Wikileaks. Regardless, it was truthful information that the public needed to know. Further, Clinton offered no denials.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Fireinfolding
Upvote 0

mark46

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jan 29, 2010
20,686
5,036
✟1,018,621.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
What Russian propaganda? Are you saying that the emails released were fabricated by the Russians? I'm beginning to think that the Russians had nothing to do with this at all. There is information that a DNC insider released the emails to Wikileaks. Regardless, it was truthful information that the public needed to know. Further, Clinton offered no denials.


OK, let's be clear. You are saying that the Russians released true information that needed to be released. Otherwise, Clinton MIGHT have been elected. So, you are suggesting that the release of the many sets of information influenced some votes. PERHAPS ENOUGH to make a difference in the result.

I would note that intelligence organizations do not KNOW whether this is the case. Maybe, the leaks had significant effects, maybe not. No one will believe any polls or analysis. We are left to judge for ourselves whether we believe that the leaks affected enough votes to have made a difference in the results.

Many tens of millions celebrate the fact that all the leaks were made. Curiously, these same people are not willing to say that the leaks had any effect.
===

Of course, Clinton and her team is responsible for their actions. That is NOT the question. The open question is whether Trump would have one without the ILLEGAL leaks. Some Republicans refused to quote anything in the illegal leakes (Rubio comes to mind). Others like Trump refereed to lead information in almost ever speech (and he now says that the leaks made no difference with voters).
 
  • Agree
Reactions: BubbaJack
Upvote 0

nChrist

AKA: Tom - Saved By Grace Through Faith
Site Supporter
Mar 21, 2003
21,119
17,842
Oklahoma, USA
✟924,660.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Mark46,

I like to see violations of the law and corruption exposed. Clinton has only herself to blame, and she deserves to be prosecuted.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Fireinfolding
Upvote 0

TerranceL

Sarcasm is kind of an art isn't it?
Jul 3, 2009
18,940
4,661
✟113,308.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
No, she lost the election because millions of people bought into the Russian propaganda that Clinton can't be trusted and is corrupt.
It was the russians who made hillary create a illegal e-mail server to get past FOIA requirements! Darn those russians!
 
Upvote 0

wing2000

E pluribus unum
Site Supporter
Aug 18, 2012
25,400
21,471
✟1,773,672.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The "leaks" didn't sway me in any way; they just showed me specifically how the DNC and the MSM are in bed together, and how people talk say strange things about pizza.

Well darn, I had you pegged as a HRC supporter...until Russian propaganda swayed you : )
 
Upvote 0

Mountain_Girl406

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Jul 9, 2015
4,818
3,855
58
✟189,014.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
Which Hillary Clinton email in the opinion of posters here, was the most damaging one?
As for the Russian hacks, do they have to affect the outcome before it becomes an issue? Is it still wrong if I try to break into your house to steal your stuff but I can't currently get past the deadbolt so am unsuccessful?
 
Upvote 0

Allandavid

Well-Known Member
Dec 30, 2016
8,056
6,929
72
Sydney
✟230,565.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Please cite credible sources and specific proof.

For the sake of argument let's say that they got into the DNC email system - not real hard to do evidently. Also, no one has said they are false.

What specific e-mail or action has had a demonstrable effect on the election? Cite your sources please, you can offer an opinion, but be forthright enough to recognize what is opinion and what is sustainable fact.

What specific piece of information stolen by Nixon's Watergate burglars impacted upon his re-election?
Oh, can't name any?
Then why the fuss? Why did his men have to go to jail and he have to quit office?
 
Upvote 0