How EXACTLY did the Russians sway the election.

[Always in His Presence]

Please cite credible sources and specific proof.

For the sake of argument let's say that they got into the DNC email system - not real hard to do evidently. Also, no one has said they are false.

What specific e-mail or action has had a demonstrable effect on the election? Cite your sources please, you can offer an opinion, but be forthright enough to recognize what is opinion and what is sustainable fact.

 

[Hank77]

I haven't seen where anyone has said that they DID sway the election.

 

[bhsmte]

I don' think we will ever know if Russian activity swayed voters in anyway.

What we do know is; Hilary had a poor track record running as the favorite. Obama upset her posing as the "change" candidate in 08. Sanders got far more support than anyone anticipated and even beat Clinton in some of the crucial rust belt states, posing as the "change" candidate.

These signs were in place before any email revelations and Trump also was going to be a "change" candidate as well. Polls showed early on, people wanted change and since Clinton is the poster child for establishment/elitist politicians, I think the clues were in place beforehand, she could be beat.

 

[Always in His Presence]

I haven't seen where anyone has said that they DID sway the election.

Neither have I.

 

[nChrist]

Clinton didn't lose the election because of the Russians. She lost because she can't be trusted and is corrupt. This is my opinion.

 

[Lutheran]

Russia? There is no way to prove they did anything, right now. Lots of Liberals have been acting like it is fact and that really annoys me.

 

[lasthero]

Russia? There is no way to prove they did anything, right now. Lots of Liberals have been acting like it is fact and that really annoys me.

Liberals like John McCain, Lindsey Graham, Marco Rubio...

 

[Lutheran]

Liberals like John McCain, Lindsey Graham, Marco Rubio...

Oh yes, I forgot them too.

 

[Fireinfolding]

Globalists lol

 

[Always in His Presence]

The only thing this thread is lacking is cited source and/or proof.

 

[Lutheran]

The only thing this thread is lacking is cited source and/or proof.

Because there isn't any..

 

[wing2000]

Of course one can't prove x voter(s) were swayed by a piece of mis-information....

 

[bhsmte]

Of course one can't prove x voter(s) were swayed by a piece of mis-information....

What was the; "mis-information"?

 

[Fireinfolding]

What was the; "mis-information"?

Yeah, wouldnt that have to imply what had come out in their own emails?

 

[Original Happy Camper]

This is a straw man issue to deflect from her Highness.

 

[wing2000]

What was the; "mis-information"?

That isn't what the op asked.

In any case, here is one example...where Trump himself repeated the mis-information - information that was spun as being written by Sidney Blumenthal.

Dear Mr. Trump, I am not Sidney Blumenthal

 

[Fireinfolding]

That isn't what the op asked.

It was to what you had stated about mis-information (not the OP) which is probably why he was asking you about it in post #13 I believe.

Only because any possible sway released in respects to any such hacking (Allegedly by the Russians) was their very own emails (which were deemed authentic).

 

[Nithavela]

Is every election talked about for this long?

 

[Fireinfolding]

Is every election talked about for this long?

Thats a great question, start a thread on it, this is my first one I even minded

 

[bhsmte]

Is every election talked about for this long?

2000 was talked about for quite a while. This one will continue to be analyzed for a long time as well. And, Trump will be the most scrutinized president in our history, from day one.