New series by Aron Ra: Why there was no Noachian Flood

[AV1611VET]

And planted false evidence of geological processes occurring over a span of billions of years in the meantime, just for fun?

Oh, boy!

 

[AV1611VET]

He hates those Christians that try to explain how it could have happened since they fail so badly.

I don't hate them.

I feel sorry for them.

 

[Subduction Zone]

Oh, boy!

I don't think that you used your "Doh!" correctly, since you are the one that should be slapping your forehead in disgust with your lack of understanding.

 

[Subduction Zone]

I don't hate them.

I feel sorry for them.

I have my doubts about that. Why would you feel sorry for them? They are slightly less wrong than you are.

 

[AV1611VET]

You got any more of Ra's junk you'd like to present to us?

 

[Subduction Zone]

You got any more of Ra's junk you'd like to present to us?

Poorly framed request. Try again.

 

[AV1611VET]

Poorly framed request. Try again.

As I said, you're a poor apologist for Aron Ra.

Thanks for the QED.

 

[Subduction Zone]

As I said, you're a poor apologist for Aron Ra.

Thanks for the QED.

He made no errors, unlike your beliefs he does not need anyone to apoligize for them.

And your request was poorly framed. Try again.

Perhaps you could try to be honest this time.

 

[AV1611VET]

Perhaps you could try to be honest this time.

I'll pass.

 

[Subduction Zone]

I'll pass.

Oh come on, it will open up whole new worlds for you. Even your Bible advocates that you should be honest.

 

[_-iconoclast-_]

Aron Ra, a former member here, has quite a few YouTube videos on creationism. Now he is going after the Flood story.

Hey sub. How u?

What qualifications does aron ra have that make him an authority to you?

Cheers

 

[Subduction Zone]

Hey sub. How u?

What qualifications does aron ra have that make him an authority to you?

Cheers

He has studied the topic rather deeply. Unlike creationists he does not make basic errors. Unlike creationists he does not lie.

 

[_-iconoclast-_]

He has studied the topic rather deeply. Unlike creationists he does not make basic errors. Unlike creationists he does not lie.

Fair enough.

Just curious brother. When you say he has studied this topic and is of good repute.

How do you measure 'deeply'?

Cheers

 

[Subduction Zone]

Fair enough.

Just curious brother. When you say he has studied this topic and is of good repute.

How do you measure 'deeply'?

Cheers

Watch his videos and find out.

If you have questions I will answer them.

 

[Subduction Zone]

He finished the series since I first posted on this thread. Here is the first and it may keep playing the whole series:

 

[_-iconoclast-_]

Watch his videos and find out.

If you have questions I will answer them.

To be 'honest' i never watch a video but do read links to sites. Thanks for invite.

What is it about aron ra you agree with so much - seen your history

I see you are a food fan brother

 

[mark kennedy]

I debated him years ago, he was something else. His animosity for anything religious was kind of disturbing but there were times when he had moments of pure brilliance. Glad to see Nelson is still active, he was always good for a vigorous debate.

 

[Subduction Zone]

To be 'honest' i never watch a video but do read links to sites. Thanks for invite.

What is it about aron ra you agree with so much - seen your history

I see you are a food fan brother

I already told you, he is well studied on the topic. He makes rather riveting videos.

 

[Subduction Zone]

I debated him years ago, he was something else. His animosity for anything religious was kind of disturbing but there were times when he had moments of pure brilliance. Glad to see Nelson is still active, he was always good for a vigorous debate.

Yes, he can be a bit harsh at times. He is an anti-theist. That is an atheist that declares all gods to be impossible. He also has little patience with dishonesty.

 

[_-iconoclast-_]

I already told you, he is well studied on the topic. He makes rather riveting videos.

Thanks.
please excuse my inquisitive nature.

How does one equate to being well studied. I have studied Christianity for a long time (20 years now). No theologian

Im an amateur

Does this make me well studied?
Or do i need a degree?

Cheers