- Nov 21, 2008
- 53,405
- 11,943
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- SDA
- Marital Status
- Married
I would have written that there WAS nothing wrong with the 10 commandments and there WAS something wrong with the Israelites. .
Romans 8:4-9 points out that there are two groups - the lost and the saved.
And in the case of the lost - well Paul says they do not submit to the Law of God - and they can not.
So then "yeah" -- it is still wrong to take God's name in vain.
And dishonoring your father and mother - is a bad idea -- still. As Christ reminds us.
Christ summed it up this way in Mark 7 -
the "Commandment of God" -- the "Word of God" and "Moses said" -- in Mark 7:6-13
Mark 7
7 Howbeit in vain do they worship me, teaching for doctrines the commandments of men.
8 For laying aside the Commandment of God, ye hold the tradition of men, as the washing of pots and cups: and many other such like things ye do.
9 And he said unto them, Full well ye reject the commandment of God, that ye may keep your own tradition.
10 For Moses said, Honour thy father and thy mother; and, Whoso curseth father or mother, let him die the death:
11 But ye say, If a man shall say to his father or mother, It is Corban, that is to say, a gift, by whatsoever thou mightest be profited by me; he shall be free.
12 And ye suffer him no more to do ought for his father or his mother;
13 Making the Word of God of none effect through your tradition, which ye have delivered: and many such like things do ye.
Certainly from their point of view they would never have accused themselves of diminishing the Ten Commandments in the least.
But what does Christ accuse them of doing?
1. Using their own traditions to nullify one of the Ten Commandments.
2. He calls the Ten Commandments "Moses says" -- and "the Word of God" and "the Commandment of God"
3. He argues that even though they do not claim to be setting aside one of the Commandments of God - they in fact are by observing the example he gives in the case of the 5th Commandment.
4. He argues that this is just one example of the many things they do with their traditions - in this way - nullifying the Word of God. Contradicting the Commandment of God - one of the TEN.
5. He states that it nullifies their worship.
6. Jesus is not defending their additions -- he is defending God's Commandments
And notice how Eph 6:2 uses that same Commandment - predicating it's affirmative on the basis of a still valid unit of TEN in which the command to honor Parents is the "FIRST commandment with a promise"!
You continue to quote scripture from the time before the Cross
66 books in my Bible -- are you saying you only have 23 after deleting the Gospels and the OT??
Your objection to "ALL SCRIPTURE is given by inspiration from God AND is to be used for doctrine" 2 Tim 3:16 -- "noted"
How about objecting to Christ's teaching in Matt 28? do you do that as well?
Matt 28
" 18 And Jesus came up and spoke to them, saying, “All authority has been given to Me in heaven and on earth. 19 Go therefore and make disciples of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and the Son and the Holy Spirit, 20 teaching them to observe all that I commanded you; and lo, I am with you always, even to the end of the age."
Do you also object to the great "Sola Scriptura" texts that rely on the very Bible you reject?
"They studied the SCRIPTURES daily to SEE IF those things spoken to them by the Apostle Paul - were so" Acts 17:11
Luke 24:27"27 Then beginning with Moses and with all the prophets, He explained to them the things concerning Himself in all the Scriptures."
This thread is about the RCC editing/changing the Sabbath Commandment to point it to week-day-1 -- are you posting against the majority of scripture - because you know that the RCC claims to accept all of it - and that this is the only way "in your mind" to affirm all TEN of the TEN commandments?
We can be thankful that at least - the RCC is not going to "that" extreme.
Nor do your own pro-Sunday scholars do it.
Based on what you claiming, we are to now circumcise all our male offspring as Abraham
Less excuses -- more Bible please.
1 Cor 7;19 compares circumcision to the "Commandments of God" - including the TEN Commandments - and says that although circumcision/uncircumcision does not matter -- what "matters is KEEPING the Commandments of God".
So then "Do not take God's name in vain" while NOT in your sliced up section of NT minus Gospel letters... is still valid.
So much so that Eph 6:2 the 5th commandment is affirmed as the "FIRST commandment (in that still valid unit-of-ten) with a promise".. As you and I both know.
Upvote
0