Political memes peanut gallery

Status
Not open for further replies.

Tallguy88

We shall see the King when he comes!
Site Supporter
Jan 13, 2009
32,459
7,737
Parts Unknown
✟240,426.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
The so-called "wage gap" isn't real.


Men can't legally just back out of pregnancies they want no part of, as far as I'm aware. They can still be liable for child support later on if the mother chooses to go after it, even if they're not part of the child's life.
Yep.
 
Upvote 0

AirPo

with a Touch of Grey
Oct 31, 2003
26,359
7,214
60
✟169,357.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
The so-called "wage gap" isn't real.


Men can't legally just back out of pregnancies they want no part of, as far as I'm aware. They can still be liable for child support later on if the mother chooses to go after it, even if they're not part of the child's life.
:doh: Critical thinking, critical thinking. If you support the state forcing the mother to have the child, then you should support the state forcing the father to take of it.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Redac

Regular Member
Jul 16, 2007
4,342
945
California
✟167,609.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
:doh: Critical thinking, critical thinking. If you support the state forcing the mother to have the child, then you should support the state forcing the father to take of it.
Sure, I don't necessarily have an issue with that. I suspect, however, that many of those making that argument wouldn't support the reverse: if a mother is freely permitted to terminate a pregnancy or unilaterally decide not to actually raise the child, a father should also be able to totally forfeit all rights to the child and by extension be free of any sort of liability for that child (or something to that effect). Would you support such a thing? Do you think many would?

Maybe next time figure out what I'm trying to say rather than just assuming I've put no thought into something.
 
Upvote 0

Armoured

So is America great again yet?
Site Supporter
Aug 31, 2013
34,358
14,061
✟234,967.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Sure, I don't necessarily have an issue with that. I suspect, however, that many of those making that argument wouldn't support the reverse: if a mother is freely permitted to terminate a pregnancy or unilaterally decide not to actually raise the child, a father should also be able to totally forfeit all rights to the child and by extension be free of any sort of liability for that child (or something to that effect). Would you support such a thing? Do you think many would?

Maybe next time figure out what I'm trying to say rather than just assuming I've put no thought into something.
It's not fair, but the two aren't comparable. In one there's a baby requiring support, in the other, there isn't.
 
Upvote 0

Redac

Regular Member
Jul 16, 2007
4,342
945
California
✟167,609.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
It's not fair, but the two aren't comparable. In one there's a baby requiring support, in the other, there isn't.
Which is a fair point. I guess I'll just reiterate my original point that the image I quoted makes an argument that doesn't make sense, because men already can't back out of pregnancies regardless of whether abortion is an option or not.
 
Upvote 0

AirPo

with a Touch of Grey
Oct 31, 2003
26,359
7,214
60
✟169,357.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Sure, I don't necessarily have an issue with that. I suspect, however, that many of those making that argument wouldn't support the reverse: if a mother is freely permitted to terminate a pregnancy or unilaterally decide not to actually raise the child, a father should also be able to totally forfeit all rights to the child and by extension be free of any sort of liability for that child (or something to that effect). Would you support such a thing? Do you think many would?

Maybe next time figure out what I'm trying to say rather than just assuming I've put no thought into something.
Seems no thought was put into that post either.

To answer the quewstion, uh, yeah. If they don't want the kid, they don't want the kid. Very stupid to force three people into a situation they don't want to be in. That's why it's a good thing the woman has the right to make the decision.
 
Upvote 0

Redac

Regular Member
Jul 16, 2007
4,342
945
California
✟167,609.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Seems no thought was put into that post either.
And what exactly do you base that on?

To answer the quewstion, uh, yeah. If they don't want the kid, they don't want the kid. Very stupid to force three people into a situation they don't want to be in.
Good for you. I've asked others the same question and been told that it's entirely up to the woman, and if she wants to keep the kid, the man should not have any right to get out of the arrangement and avoid being financially liable for the kid. Hence, the question.

That's why it's a good thing the woman has the right to make the decision.
Sure, but that's not the point I was raising. The original point was that, one, that meme was stupid because men already can't just walk away from an unwanted pregnancy, and two, many who make that sort of argument would not conversely allow both men and women decide to forfeit responsibility for an unwanted pregnancy. They're fine with women using abortion as birth control, but if the father decides he doesn't want any part of it, well, too bad. If she keeps it, you're still on the hook regardless.

Armoured addressed that line of questioning and made a good point about it. All you've done so far is assume I'm posting with no thought put into what I'm saying.
 
Upvote 0

AirPo

with a Touch of Grey
Oct 31, 2003
26,359
7,214
60
✟169,357.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
And what exactly do you base that on?
The post.

Good for you. I've asked others the same question and been told that it's entirely up to the woman, and if she wants to keep the kid, the man should not have any right to get out of the arrangement and avoid being financially liable for the kid. Hence, the question.
Please keep the hypothetical scenarios consistant.

Sure, but that's not the point I was raising. The original point was that, one, that meme was stupid because men already can't just walk away from an unwanted pregnancy, and two, many who make that sort of argument would not conversely allow both men and women decide to forfeit responsibility for an unwanted pregnancy. They're fine with women using abortion as birth control, but if the father decides he doesn't want any part of it, well, too bad. If she keeps it, you're still on the hook regardless.

Armoured addressed that line of questioning and made a good point about it. All you've done so far is assume I'm posting with no thought put into what I'm saying.
The point of the meme was missed, that what I addressed. Armoured addressed that as well.

but the two aren't comparable.
 
Upvote 0

Shiloh Raven

Well-Known Member
May 14, 2016
12,509
11,495
Texas
✟228,180.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
hitlarymeme.jpg

Godwin's Law strikes again. But see how easy it is to play that game?

ComparingTrumptoHitler.jpg
 
  • Like
Reactions: stamperben
Upvote 0

TLK Valentine

I've already read the books you want burned.
Apr 15, 2012
64,493
30,319
Behind the 8-ball, but ahead of the curve.
✟541,512.00
Country
United States
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Single
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Vylo

Stick with the King!
Aug 3, 2003
24,732
7,790
43
New Jersey
✟203,465.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others

After looking into this issue I've come to the conclusion that the standing rock tribe's rights and lands are being grossly violated. While I'm not opposed to pipelines in general, you can't run them through areas without people's permissions, and running them through treaty lands, especially without consultation to the tribe is an injustice that can't be tolerated. The pipeline should be rerouted or scrapped all together.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

DaisyDay

I Did Nothing Wrong!! ~~Team Deep State
Jan 7, 2003
38,091
17,561
Finger Lakes
✟212,929.00
Country
United States
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
The so-called "wage gap" isn't real.
That's true - women just like making less because that way the mens will take care of them.:love2:
 
Upvote 0

Vylo

Stick with the King!
Aug 3, 2003
24,732
7,790
43
New Jersey
✟203,465.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
That's true - women just like making less because that way the mens will take care of them.:love2:
I believe they are refering to the fact that the wage gap is greatly exaggerated. Things like hours worked are not considered. There is still a small gap, in the 3% area, but most of it has closed. The bigger issue lies with maternal leave, and prejudice against hiring/promoting qualified women. Generally, once they are in or promoted up, women are compensated fairly. But if its a huge hurdle to get there, then that leaves something to be desired.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Vylo

Stick with the King!
Aug 3, 2003
24,732
7,790
43
New Jersey
✟203,465.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others

Think about this; Nicola Tesla was one of the most brilliant inventors and scientists to have ever lived. After being forced out of a business arrangement by his partners, he worked as a ditch digger. You had one of the greatest minds in human history literally digging holes. Imagine if he had been shackled and unable to return to his work.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Armoured
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.