Real time or evo time?

[lesliedellow]

Not true. That position assumes everything but your own part.

Example: If I come across a bicycle and use it for a time and then leave it again where I found it - I know very little...except that I used a bicycle that I didn't make, buy, or have a right to take authority over. That makes me a user - not an authority on bicycles.

Oh, come come. With your hotline to God, you can be an authority on anything.

 

[dad]

Reality check, she's gong less.

Not anymore, because of weak arguments, she was sullied with a gong. There wasn't a lot of choice there.

 

[dad]

But I bet Noah was in yours.

No. I have never found any biblical patriarchs in my tub or shower. I bet they would have lived in the different state past though.

 

[dad]

Oh, come come. With your hotline to God, you can be an authority on anything.

Sons of God do have a connection with Pops.

 

[Kylie]

We understand what you post. Vague balderdash. Pretentious twaddle. Unsupported.

Real tired line from you, dad. You got anything more than denial? If so, why don't you try it? Because this is getting boring.

Easy peasy. They ALL use the same state past belief. Nothing else. Ever. 100%.

That's not an explanation.

I am saying people should not commit fraud and claim a belief is science.

Yeah, science is the stuff that has EVIDENCE. That's the thing I have and you don't.

The ONLT tecnique is the blind belief in the unproven same state past. They use that on everything. One trick pony.

You keep saying this, but you are wrong.

Or to suggest otherwise...so?

So big coincidence. Got it.

If you spray paint a bunch of dolls red, then they all are red.

Of course, the red paint in the past state was still all the same. It's not like the dolls would have been different colours in the past state, but then change to the same colour now.

And likewise, if the results of dating techniques are the same today, they must have had the same ratios in the past.

No, the tremendous pressure of exploding founts of the deep are thought to have resulted in some cases in water and material carried by the water being sent to space.

Thought by who? You? And if the water was coming out with such force, how could any of it have stayed on Earth?

And why would God want to do this with the water anyway if he just wanted to get rid of life on Earth. Was God like, "I want to destroy humanity, because they are evil. Target #1: Mercury!"

There is also the thought that the great wind after the flood may have had some sort of space based origin, and maybe resulted in some ejecta as well?

Yes, of course, outer space is well known for its windiness.

Or the same?

The fact that everything we see matches perfectly with what we would expect to see if they had been the same suggests that they were the same.

False. Only is one biased and willingly embraces tainted evidences.

Oh, more lazy denial. You got anything better than this? Or you just gonna stick with yelling, "Fraid not!" in each post?

Since you are cheerleading so called science blindly here, that is no surprise.

I know and understand more about science than you do.

 

[Kylie]

You were not in Noah's bathtub.

You have no understanding of what I'm actually saying, do you?

(I suspect that you will reply by saying you do understand, and then post some unsupported denial.)

 

[Kylie]

Not true. That position assumes everything but your own part.

Example: If I come across a bicycle and use it for a time and then leave it again where I found it - I know very little...except that I used a bicycle that I didn't make, buy, or have a right to take authority over. That makes me a user - not an authority on bicycles.

Huh? I have no idea what you are trying to say here.

If I see a lightbulb and measure its temperature, I can use that temperature along with a knowledge of how rapidly it cools to figure out how long ago the light was on. I know from those results the most recent time that the light was switched on, and how long it has been off and cooling.

What are you trying to illustrate with your bike analogy? There is no clock involved with that (like the cooling of the lightbulb). It makes no sense to me.

 

[AirPo]

Not anymore, because of weak arguments, she was sullied with a gong. There wasn't a lot of choice there.

Reality check! The is only one way. It can't create reality, only it away. But then again the can away the fact that it can't create reality, and all is good! That's what is so much fun about The HI Theory.

 

[AirPo]

No. I have never found any biblical patriarchs in my tub or shower. I bet they would have lived in the different state past though.

A fantasy land that must be very crowded.

 

[AirPo]

You have no understanding of what I'm actually saying, do you?

(I suspect that you will reply by saying you do understand, and then post some unsupported denial.)

Understanding is not a prerequisite of The HI Theory.

 

[dad]

Understanding is not a prerequisite of The HI Theory.

Keep us posted.

 

[dad]

You have no understanding of what I'm actually saying, do you?

(I suspect that you will reply by saying you do understand, and then post some unsupported denial.)

Noah's day is beyond your parable of the tub.

 

[dad]

If I see a lightbulb and measure its temperature, .

You can't do that for the far pat when Adam lived. You look at laws and thermodynamics etc..NOW.

 

[lesliedellow]

You can't do that for the far pat when Adam lived. You look at laws and thermodynamics etc..NOW.

And then.

 

[dad]

And then.

How can you tell what laws such as thermodynamics were then? Tell us how we can tell if there was Hafnium-182 at creation? Tungsten? Now I sure hope you do not 'determine' how much of these sorts of things existed at creation and afterward early in earth history by looking at the relation of ratios of neutrons and protons now!

You see that would only tell us you believe that the radioactive decay that now happens also was responsible for it all then.

"
hers figured this out by measuring the variations of the abundance of the isotope of tungsten in these rocks (isotopes are versions of an element in which the number of neutrons in each atom differs from the number of protons). They measured tungsten because it contains one isotope of mass 182 that is created when an isotope of the element hafnium undergoes radioactive decay, meaning its elemental composition changes as it gives off radiation. Hafnium-182 only existed during Earth’s first 50 million years. The time it takes for half of any quantity of hafnium-182 to decay into tungsten-182 is 9 million years."

The team determined that the basalts from Baffin Island and the Ontong Java Plateau contain slightly more tungsten-182 than other young volcanic rocks. Because all the hafnium-182 decayed to tungsten-182 early in our planet's history, these findings indicate that the mantle material that melted to form the flood basalt rocks that the team studied originally had more hafnium than the rest of the mantle.

http://sciencenetlinks.com/science-news/science-updates/ancient-rocks/

 

[catzrfluffy]

dad

"Go to bed!"

 

[dad]

"Go to bed!"

Close...putting evolution to rest...in peace.

 

[lesliedellow]

How can you tell what laws such as thermodynamics were then?

http://www.reasons.org/articles/stronger-and-more-comprehensive-tests-affirm-the-universe’s-unchanging-physics

I await yet another of your ad hoc hypotheses.

 

[dad]

http://www.reasons.org/articles/stronger-and-more-comprehensive-tests-affirm-the-universe’s-unchanging-physics

I await yet another of your ad hoc hypotheses.

From your link..

"In astronomy, it takes time for light from the stars, galaxies, and quasars to reach telescopes..."

Does this not assume there IS time there? Can you prove it? Or did you think we would chuck out Christ as creator, and worship man's 'wisdom' as Hugh did??

 

[Kylie]

Noah's day is beyond your parable of the tub.

Reality is beyond your DSP idea.