Just to expand on this for anyone interested, this before I head off..........I have a list of "good deeds" as long as my arm to perform........
Often, to justify hell or whatever, we have the "God did not want robots" argument. No, I would say "he" did not. The implication is then drawn that, given we must be given choice, unless we can choose "hell" our free will is made null and void. Personally I find such an argument incoherent and demonstrably wrong........As I see it we are here not to excercise choice in any such eternally decisive manner,
but to receive/learn to be free. We would seem to be born without such freedom.
Here is Merton on "The gift of freedom"
The mere ability to choose between good and evil is the lowest limit of freedom, and the only thing that is free about it is the fact that we can still choose good.
To the extent that you are free to choose evil, you are not free. An evil choice destroys freedom.
We can never choose evil as evil: only as an apparent good. But when we decide to do something that seems to us to be good when it is not really so, we are doing something that we do not really want to do, and therefore we are not really free.
Perfect spiritual freedom is a total inability to make any evil choice. When everything you desire is truly good and every choice not only aspires to that good but attains it, then you are free because you do everything that you want, every act of your will ends in perfect fulfillment.
Freedom therefore does not consist in an equal balance between good and evil choices but in the perfect love and acceptance of what is really good and the perfect hatred and rejection of what is evil, so that everything you do is good and makes you happy, and you refuse and deny and ignore every possibility that might lead to unhappiness and self-deception and grief. Only the man who has rejected all evil so completely that he is unable to desire it at all, is truly free. God, in whom there is absolutely no shadow or possibility of evil or of sin, is infinitely free. In fact, he is Freedom.
(
from New Seeds of Contemplation)
(Just a short word on my quoting others. For me, I am actually reassured when I hear the self same thing said by human beings of different cultures and religions. How does it reassure me? That I am hearing the voice of experience, or personal insight, and not just hearing a slogan drawn from a book. In the words above of Merton, I think of much the same point being made by the Theravada Elder Nyanaonika Thera concerning the path to freedom. Anyway, I did say a short word...)
So as I see it we are here to
learn to be free, and such is a gift. It is to be
realised, not "earned" or "attained" or even chosen (or not)
About the foreknowledge of God of our choices, which are deemed "free". Can even God know in advance the choice of a radically, totally free being? Surely such a freedom would involve a choice ex-nihilo? As Sartre said, if there is a God we cannot be free, as we would not have chosen our own essence. But I leave that to the philosophers among us. Something to ponder in between feeding the cat and avoiding the next household chore.
As I see it, to learn to be free opens up our world to all. Atheists, ignostics, whoever. My own Faith is that Reality-as-is is pure freedom, and can be equated with what we can call "love", "compassion". That is my faith, one that I find I need to function. I do not seek to convince anyone of it. But to throw off the chains of our particular conditioning is surely a worthy aim?
So this holy life.......does not have gain, honour, and renown for its benefit, or the attainment of virtue for its benefit, or the attainment of concentration for its benefit, or knowledge and vision for its benefit. But it is this unshakeable deliverance of mind that is the goal of this holy life, its heartwood, and its end. (Lines from the Majjhima Nikaya, from the Theravada texts of Buddhism)
Anyway, good deeds await my doing..........