So you are into Replacement Theology???
Covenant theology is not replacement theology and you know it. Though there are some, not covenant theologians, who hold to a replacement theology, Campbellites if I remember correctly, the term is commonly used as a perjorative which I believe you also know.So you are into Replacement Theology???
How else would you talk to God?
My question to you was: 'How can prayer be effective'. You have not answered this question. Instead, you answer my question with another question.
Does this conversation with God include John 14:13-14 (ESV) for every believer? 'Whatever you ask in my name, this I will do, that the Father may be glorified in the Son. 14 If you ask me for anything in my name, I will do it'.
Prayer [through the Spirit] is effective because it permits us communication with God.
Of course it died. Hope thst helps you.You still are not answering my question:
Does this conversation with God include John 14:13-14 (ESV) for every believer? 'Whatever you ask in my name, this I will do, that the Father may be glorified in the Son. 14 If you ask me for anything in my name, I will do it'.
You seem to be looking for answers, so I answered.What is that intrusion meant to mean? That you don't want to become involved in a reasonable conversation???
My post was on topic. Your responses, as usual, are not.
My post was on topic. It appears, though, that you may not have understood it. That doesn't make my post a red herring. If you'd like, I'll explain it so that it makes more sense to you.You did not respond to the content of my post but went off with your own tangent, so it was a red herring fallacy. You engaged in fallacious reasoning by doing such. We cannot have a reasonable conversation when you do this.
But this has been typical of some of your responses to me over many years.
Oz
My post was on topic. It appears, though, that you may not have understood it. That doesn't make my post a red herring. If you'd like, I'll explain it so that it makes more sense to you.