- May 28, 2015
- 15,873
- 7,590
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Single
- Politics
- US-Constitution
Just follow the thread up......Which post are you quoting here?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Just follow the thread up......Which post are you quoting here?
How could I possibly prove that not all systems are designed to your satisfaction when you have already defined a "system" as something designed? I can only point out that you are conflating the two words ("system" and "design") in order to advance your argument. When we encounter a system, we can ask whether it is designed. But we don't assume that, because it is a system, it must be designed.You haven't proven that all systems are not designed. Name one!
That's what you keep claiming, yes, but how about trying to substantiate it? I know that some things are designed, but how did you reason to the conclusion that "everything is designed"?Because everything is designed.
Oh, don't tell me you need a dictionary too?
Indeed. It is that hypocrisy that prompted me to ask the question.No, he doesn't need a dictionary, but he appears to be trying to reconcile the meaning of those terms, with what you post.
Yes, a system with processes that we can model and thus try to understand.If it's not random, it's a system.
Try me. Show me a system that's not designed.How could I possibly prove that not all systems are designed to your satisfaction when you have already defined a "system" as something designed? I can only point out that you are conflating the two words ("system" and "design") in order to advance your argument. When we encounter a system, we can ask whether it is designed. But we don't assume that, because it is a system, it must be designed.
Show me something that's not designed.That's what you keep claiming, yes, but how about trying to substantiate it? I know that some things are designed, but how did you reason to the conclusion that "everything is designed"?
But you've already defined a "system" as something designed, meaning that every time you encounter something systematic, you automatically conclude that it is designed. In your mind, there is no way for a system to emerge naturally; it must be the result of design.Try me. Show me a system that's not designed.
That's very true. The only way for us to understand it is to study it and find out how they work based on predictable events. Like the laws of thermodynamics (which also are evidence of God, by the way).Yes, a system with processes that we can model and thus try to understand.
So that puddle over there was designed? It's as much a design to you as a car or rocket?Show me something that's not designed.
Here is the definition for "systematic" given in the Merriam-Webster dictionary:
Note also the definition of "system" given:
So systems operating naturally on their own without the guidance of a supernatural agent is somehow evidence for a supernatural agent?That's very true. The only way for us to understand it is to study it and find out how they work based on predictable events. Like the laws of thermodynamics (which also are evidence of God, by the way).
Full Definition of systemBut you've already defined a "system" as something designed, meaning that every time you encounter something systematic, you automatically conclude that it is designed. In your mind, there is no way for a system to emerge naturally; it must be the result of design.
The molecules that are attracted to each other forming droplets which further form larger collections of water sound designed to me, not just something that happens by chance.....So that puddle over there was designed? It's as much a design to you as a car or rocket?
Show me one such system.So systems operating naturally on their own without the guidance of a supernatural agent is somehow evidence for a supernatural agent?
I did provide the full definition. You never answered my question about polysemy.Just not the full definition.....
You mentioned one yourself: the laws of thermodynamics.Show me one such system.
You think that's a system? The water in the puddle, the mud in the puddle, are designed. The water is a combination of atoms which were designed, and so is the dirt in the mud. The puddle isn't a system, per se.So that puddle over there was designed? It's as much a design to you as a car or rocket?
Where did I say that it happened by chance? You are falling into the same false dichotomy again.The molecules that are attracted to each other forming droplets which further form larger collections of water sound designed to me, not just something that happens by chance.....
Simple Definition of lawYou mentioned one yourself: the laws of thermodynamics.