• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

How Did Fire Survive Noah's Flood?

Subduction Zone

Regular Member
Dec 17, 2012
32,629
12,069
✟230,471.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
You brought up the problem of ventilation, I gave the obvious solution (there's nothing humorous about methane, if you get my drift). :p

Sorry, the Ark was a joke. Furnaces would be an even bigger joke since the Ark would have predated the age for such a construct.
 
Upvote 0

Jay Follett

Well-Known Member
Mar 6, 2016
498
204
53
UK
✟1,705.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
The ark was made of wood but the furnaces would have been metal. I'm guessing the fuel was bitumen or coal.
Are you trying to tell us that Noah was not only a ship builder but he could smelt iron as well? this is a joke right?
why didn't your God just speak an ark into existence and save everyone the trouble? it would also do away with this nonsense, talking with adults as though they were children might be OK in the US but I can tell you it doesn't sit well with me.
 
Upvote 0

OldWiseGuy

Wake me when it's soup.
Site Supporter
Feb 4, 2006
46,773
10,977
Wisconsin
Visit site
✟1,005,242.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Are you trying to tell us that Noah was not only a ship builder but he could smelt iron as well? this is a joke right?
why didn't your God just speak an ark into existence and save everyone the trouble? it would also do away with this nonsense, talking with adults as though they were children might be OK in the US but I can tell you it doesn't sit well with me.

The ark was not a 'ship', so Noah didn't have to be a 'ship builder'. Also he didn't need to know how to smelt metal, he hired people to do that. In fact he wouldn't even have needed to design the ark as he would have hired that done as well (Henry Ford was an "auto maker" but didn't 'make' a single auto). :D
 
Upvote 0

OldWiseGuy

Wake me when it's soup.
Site Supporter
Feb 4, 2006
46,773
10,977
Wisconsin
Visit site
✟1,005,242.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Sorry, the Ark was a joke. Furnaces would be an even bigger joke since the Ark would have predated the age for such a construct.

The pioneers made fireplaces (furnaces) out of wood and clay. The furnaces on the ark didn't have to made of metal. The chimney on the ark could have been made entirely of wood. The only masonry needed would have been the firebox. Native Americans built fires inside of their tipi's and other 'combustible' structures and depended on a 'controlled draft' to direct smoke up and away while bringing in fresh air.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Jay Follett

Well-Known Member
Mar 6, 2016
498
204
53
UK
✟1,705.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Married
The ark was not a 'ship', so Noah didn't have to be a 'ship builder'.
A 'ship' or a large vessel like that would have needed expertise to make that was not around at the time.
Also he didn't need to know how to smelt metal, he hired people to do that. In fact he wouldn't even have needed to design the ark as he would have hired that done as well (Henry Ford was an "auto maker" but didn't 'make' a single auto). :D
You really don't get it do you? when was Noah alive? if it was before 800 years BC there was no iron smelting, anywhere.
 
Upvote 0

OldWiseGuy

Wake me when it's soup.
Site Supporter
Feb 4, 2006
46,773
10,977
Wisconsin
Visit site
✟1,005,242.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
A 'ship' or a large vessel like that would have needed expertise to make that was not around at the time.

How do you know this?

You really don't get it do you? when was Noah alive? if it was before 800 years BC there was no iron smelting, anywhere.

Bible history records metal working prior to the flood (Genesis 4:22) . It would follow that many crafts were well developed at the time.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,259
52,668
Guam
✟5,158,687.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Bible history records metal working prior to the flood (Genesis 4:22) . It would follow that many crafts were well developed at the time.
You don't think the Ark had metal parts, do you?
 
Upvote 0

Subduction Zone

Regular Member
Dec 17, 2012
32,629
12,069
✟230,471.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
How do you know this?



Bible history records metal working prior to the flood (Genesis 4:22) . It would follow that many crafts were well developed at the time.
First off since there was no "Flood of Genesis" that claim is bogus. And the Bible is not a valid source of history. We know there was no flood because over 5 miles of water being added to the Earth and magicked away would have left a mark. There are no such marks.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,259
52,668
Guam
✟5,158,687.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
You really don't get it do you? when was Noah alive? if it was before 800 years BC there was no iron smelting, anywhere.
I'm afraid there was.

Genesis 4:22 And Zillah, she also bare Tubalcain, an instructer of every artificer in brass and iron: and the sister of Tubalcain was Naamah.

And I wouldn't be surprised if they had electricity back then as well, seeing as who were walking the earth in the days of Noah.

Genesis 6:1 And it came to pass, when men began to multiply on the face of the earth, and daughters were born unto them,
Genesis 6:2 That the sons of God saw the daughters of men that they were fair; and they took them wives of all which they chose.


Satan was probably able to bring advanced technology to mankind that eventually had to be halted.

And God did it in style at Babel.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,259
52,668
Guam
✟5,158,687.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
We know there was no flood because over 5 miles of water being added to the Earth and magicked away would have left a mark.
They say ... (and I believe it) ... that when God healed people directly there were no scars left behind.

Genesis 2:21 And the LORD God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and he slept: and he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh instead thereof;
 
Upvote 0

Subduction Zone

Regular Member
Dec 17, 2012
32,629
12,069
✟230,471.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
They say ... (and I believe it) ... that when God healed people directly there were no scars left behind.

Genesis 2:21 And the LORD God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and he slept: and he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh instead thereof;
There is a difference between a lack of scars and a false history.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,259
52,668
Guam
✟5,158,687.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
There is a difference between a lack of scars and a false history.
According to you though, there should be scars left behind.

Do you know how hard it would be to convince someone GOD DID IT if there were scars left behind?

If there were scars left behind, scientists would be ooking MOTHER NATURE DID IT.
 
Upvote 0

homohabilis117

Chew Manioc
Feb 22, 2016
126
26
United States
✟23,350.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
The ark was made of wood but the furnaces would have been metal. I'm guessing the fuel was bitumen or coal.
Coal is a fossil fuel. Fossil. How did fossil fuels form before Noah's flood? According to the bible the world God made was "good". How is building a world on top of dead, pressurized, solidified organic matter good? Also, if God simply "created" coal as part of the literal 6 day creation, he is essentially making illusions. Coal is made of organic matter. If coal was created and not formed, it quite literally means that God planted evidence. And as we all know "planting" evidence is only needed when someone wants someone else to believe a different version of reality. If God created a young earth, fine. But if so, it really looks like he wanted us to believe in an old one.
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,259
52,668
Guam
✟5,158,687.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Also, if God simply "created" coal as part of the literal 6 day creation, he is essentially making illusions.
Why?

Suppose God created coal as an "easter egg" in the earth to be discovered at the proper time?

Proverbs 25:2 It is the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings is to search out a matter.

(Notice God refers to scientists as "kings"?)
homohabilis117 said:
Coal is made of organic matter. If coal was created and not formed, it quite literally means that God planted evidence.
Either that, or He "planted" coal.

(Interesting word choice there. Are you trying to make it look like God is a deceiver?)
 
Upvote 0

homohabilis117

Chew Manioc
Feb 22, 2016
126
26
United States
✟23,350.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
According to you though, there should be scars left behind.

Do you know how hard it would be to convince someone GOD DID IT if there were scars left behind?

If there were scars left behind, scientists would be ooking MOTHER NATURE DID IT.
What you are saying is the opposite extreme of what materialists say. What you are saying when you boil it down is that God is constantly changing reality to such an extent that it can't be known. But if God is constantly altering reality to such an extent, then your senses are completely untrustworthy. If your sense are so completely useless, how do you know that when you are reading the bible you are not actually holding a copy of harry potter and simply believing that it is the bible?
 
Upvote 0

Subduction Zone

Regular Member
Dec 17, 2012
32,629
12,069
✟230,471.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
According to you though, there should be scars left behind.

Do you know how hard it would be to convince someone GOD DID IT if there were scars left behind?

If there were scars left behind, scientists would be ooking MOTHER NATURE DID IT.
It is reasonable to conclude that there would be marks left from such activity. There is no valid Biblical reason to assume that God would fix the surface of the Earth and you go much further, you tell us that he lied about what he did. You may not realize that you do make that claim, that is because you don't know how to use logic. Again, the Earth tells us that it has a history. It does not match that of the Noah's Ark Flood myth. That means that your version of God not only fixed the surface of the Earth, he went much much further than that. According to you he put a history, for no fathomable reason, that tells us there was no flood, there was no Adam and Eve. That means you have to believe in a lying God. Most Christians do not think that is reasonable.
 
  • Like
Reactions: poggytyke
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,259
52,668
Guam
✟5,158,687.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Upvote 0

homohabilis117

Chew Manioc
Feb 22, 2016
126
26
United States
✟23,350.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
Why?

Suppose God created coal as an "easter egg" in the earth to be discovered at the proper time?

Proverbs 25:2 It is the glory of God to conceal a thing: but the honour of kings is to search out a matter.

(Notice God refers to scientists as "kings"?)Either that, or He "planted" coal.

(Interesting word choice there. Are you trying to make it look like God is a deceiver?)
If God created something that obviously looks organic in nature (coal does) that never lived, then yes, that would seem deceptive. But my whole point is that God did not do that. Coal is coal. A carbon based substance created by the death and preservation of ancient organisms. Coal seams have preserved imprints of leaves and other living structures. Why would God create the impression of a dead smashed leaf that never once lived? And if you say he did for whatever reason, then you are basically admitting that reality has no rhyme or reason. And if that is the case, you can't trust your senses at all. But if your senses are completely untrustworthy you have no way of knowing God didn't create the world last week.
 
  • Like
Reactions: poggytyke
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,259
52,668
Guam
✟5,158,687.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
It is reasonable to conclude that there would be marks left from such activity. There is no valid Biblical reason to assume that God would fix the surface of the Earth and you go much further, you tell us that he lied about what he did. You may not realize that you do make that claim, that is because you don't know how to use logic. Again, the Earth tells us that it has a history. It does not match that of the Noah's Ark Flood myth. That means that your version of God not only fixed the surface of the Earth, he went much much further than that. According to you he put a history, for no fathomable reason, that tells us there was no flood, there was no Adam and Eve. That means you have to believe in a lying God. Most Christians do not think that is reasonable.
Suit yourself.

I'm not going to repeat myself.
 
Upvote 0