Douglas Hendrickson made this statement: "The cancer is not a human life, but it is undoubtedly human and alive, i.e. human life."
Do you equate the value of a cancer cell with the value of human life since you believe the cancer cell is human and alive....in other words "human life"?
The way you put it you are contrasting one cancer cell with (
all) human life. "Human life" (without qualification) would be everything of human beings that ever existed on the earth.
I have a
correct and true understanding (not mere belief) that human cancer cells, the cancer cells found in human beings (unfortunately), since they have human DNA and constitute (spurious, unwanted) flesh of a human being, and again unfortunately are alive (unless they are killed or die off otherwise), they are yes indeed appropriately called "human life."
Presumably you can tell from this that I don't think the value of the life found in cancer cells (unfortunate and spurious) is equal to the value of
other human life. For instance, the value of the human life that is my daughter who is ALSO
a human life, a human being.
So, hopefully you get the point of this, the cancer cells, the cancer IS human life, just like fetal cells, the fetus IS human life.
In other words, that you can TRUTHFULLY call fetuses "human life" proves nothing that you would want to prove.