- Nov 28, 2003
- 21,728
- 12,227
- 58
- Country
- Australia
- Faith
- Eastern Orthodox
- Marital Status
- Married
Fr Mangan is not a Church Father, nor does he quote any Scripture or Church Father to support his view.
Upvote
0
Fr Mangan is not a Church Father, nor does he quote any Scripture or Church Father to support his view.
What better way to love Jesus than to love his Blessed Mother? She is above all creatures in Heaven and on Earth. Father, Son and Holy Spirit are directly above her.
She mediates for us to her Son. She intercedes for us her children.
I am reading a great book at present called "True Devotion to Mary" By Louis - Marie De Montfort
In there is a fabulous explanation for those that dont understand Our deep love of Mary etc.
Nobody 'worships' Mary. I dont know of anyone that does!
She is the Queen of Heaven!
Can you provide a link to the Papal source for this claim?
Thank-you...
Arsenios
I've heard it said that the action of the Holy Spirit in overshadowing her has nuptial connotations like the following examples.Yes, that is a very silly notion...
One Orthodox theologoumenon is the understanding that
just as God formed Eve from the rib of Adam,
so also did God the Holy Spirit form Christ in the womb of the Blessed Virgin...
Arsenios
PS - A theologoumenon is a pious Orthodox theological opinion
that has not been dogmatized in the Church...
A.
[Edit: here's an explicit source from the Pope of the Catholic Church, John Paul II:
In a sense her journey of faith is longer.
The Holy Spirit had already come down upon her,
and she became his faithful spouse at the Annunciation,
welcoming the Word of the true God,
offering "the full submission of intellect and will...
http://w2.vatican.va/content/john-p.../hf_jp-ii_enc_25031987_redemptoris-mater.html
http://campus.udayton.edu/mary/meditations/h-spirit
I've heard it said that the action of the Holy Spirit in overshadowing her has nuptial connotations like the following examples.
Ruth/ boaz
Ruth 3:9 -10
And he said to her: Who art thou? And she answered: I am Ruth thy handmaid: spread thy coverlet over thy servant, for thou art a near kinsman. And he said, Blessed be thou of the Lord, my daughter: for thou hast shewed more kindness in the latter end than at the beginning, inasmuch as thou followedst not young men, whether poor or rich.
....Ruth 4:13 So Boaz took Ruth, and she was his wife: and when he went in unto her, the Lord gave her conception, and she bare a son.
Ezekiel 16:7-8
I have caused thee to multiply as the bud of the field, and thou hast increased and waxen great, and thou art come to excellent ornaments: thy breasts are fashioned, and thine hair is grown, whereas thou wast naked and bare.
Now when I passed by thee, and looked upon thee, behold, thy time was the time of love; and I spread my skirt over thee, and covered thy nakedness: yea, I sware unto thee, and entered into a covenant with thee, saith the Lord God, and thou becamest mine.
So which Church Fathers use these verses as support for calling Mary the spouse of the Holy Spirit?I've heard it said that the action of the Holy Spirit in overshadowing her has nuptial connotations like the following examples.
Ruth/ boaz
Ruth 3:9 -10
And he said to her: Who art thou? And she answered: I am Ruth thy handmaid: spread thy coverlet over thy servant, for thou art a near kinsman. And he said, Blessed be thou of the Lord, my daughter: for thou hast shewed more kindness in the latter end than at the beginning, inasmuch as thou followedst not young men, whether poor or rich.
....Ruth 4:13 So Boaz took Ruth, and she was his wife: and when he went in unto her, the Lord gave her conception, and she bare a son.
Ezekiel 16:7-8
I have caused thee to multiply as the bud of the field, and thou hast increased and waxen great, and thou art come to excellent ornaments: thy breasts are fashioned, and thine hair is grown, whereas thou wast naked and bare.
Now when I passed by thee, and looked upon thee, behold, thy time was the time of love; and I spread my skirt over thee, and covered thy nakedness: yea, I sware unto thee, and entered into a covenant with thee, saith the Lord God, and thou becamest mine.
I've heard it said that the action of the Holy Spirit in overshadowing her has nuptial connotations like the following examples.
Ruth/ boaz
Ruth 3:9 -10
And he said to her: Who art thou? And she answered: I am Ruth thy handmaid: spread thy coverlet over thy servant, for thou art a near kinsman. And he said, Blessed be thou of the Lord, my daughter: for thou hast shewed more kindness in the latter end than at the beginning, inasmuch as thou followedst not young men, whether poor or rich.
....Ruth 4:13 So Boaz took Ruth, and she was his wife: and when he went in unto her, the Lord gave her conception, and she bare a son.
Ezekiel 16:7-8
I have caused thee to multiply as the bud of the field, and thou hast increased and waxen great, and thou art come to excellent ornaments: thy breasts are fashioned, and thine hair is grown, whereas thou wast naked and bare.
Now when I passed by thee, and looked upon thee, behold, thy time was the time of love; and I spread my skirt over thee, and covered thy nakedness: yea, I sware unto thee, and entered into a covenant with thee, saith the Lord God, and thou becamest mine.
Great examples of the spousal language which is also used to describe the Holy Spirit's relationship with Mary. Thanks for posting this.
"So which Church Fathers use these verses as support for calling Mary the spouse of the Holy Spirit?"
Anyone at all in the first thousand years of the Christian Faith?
Arsenios
I've been busy and wanted to respond earlier but here's what I found. Not exactly what you asked for but .. I'll dig around for that toSo which Church Fathers use these verses as support for calling Mary the spouse of the Holy Spirit?
The idea of the cloak/skirt (ezek16:7-8, ruth3:9-10/4:13) covering as a euphemism for a spousal relationship seems to me confirmed in the following verse.The overshadowing of the Holy Spirit, while it may or may not have the meaning of "knowing" in the Biblical sense of marital conjugation, is NOT a substitute term for marriage when understood spiritually... Just as the Marriage of the Lamb is NOT a carnal marriage, and we do NOT refer to the Saints as being MARRIED to Christ... The relationship is WAY more intimate than the marriage bed and its household...
Arsenios
For a time I was confused when Catholics named virgins after the geographic locations where they were claimed to have appeared. I thought that they were referring to different virgins. Then I found out that they all were referring to Mary.
It becomes even more confusing when it turns out that several of these "virgins" are identified with places of pagan worship of various goddesses, as for example the Virgin of Guadalupe.
As I understand it, the place where the Mother of God appeared on Tepeyac hill had been associated--at some point anyway--with the goddess "Tonantzin", who was associated with fertility and the earth. Mary is the New Earth who conceived God the Savior in her womb. My understanding is that God does affirm what is good in native cultures, while at the same time--through Mary and Christ--saving the people from what is bad. This reminds me of St. Paul using the statue of an "unknown God" to proclaim that Christ is that unknown God. I know that Mary clearly identified herself not as Tonantzin, but as the Virgin Mary, the Mother of God who created all that is. Thus she is clearly affirming Monotheism.
I love our Lady of Guadalupe and find Christ through her and venerate her icon. What she said has been reflected in my own life since I have consecrated myself to Jesus Christ through His Mother. Before I was miserable and had too many problems. Now, I still know I have sinned very greatly. But I have much hope in God's Mercy. And I still have a cross to bear, but it is sweet. Here are our Lady of Guadalupe's words:
"Know, know for sure, my dearest, littlest, and youngest son, that I am the perfect and ever Virgin Holy Mary, Mother of the God of truth through Whom everything lives, the Lord of all things near us, the Lord of heaven and earth. I want very much to have a little house built here for me, in which I will show Him, I will exalt Him and make Him manifest. I will give Him to the people in all my personal love, in my compassion, in my help, in my protection: because I am truly your merciful Mother, yours and all the people who live united in this land and of all the other people of different ancestries, my lovers, who love me, those who seek me, those who trust in me. Here I will hear their weeping, their complaints and heal all their sorrows, hardships and sufferings. And to bring about what my compassionate and merciful concern is trying to achieve, you must go to the residence of the Bishop of Mexico and tell him that I sent you here to show him how strongly I wish him to build me a temple here on the plain; you will report to him exactly all you have seen, admired and what you have heard. Know for sure I will appreciate it very much, be grateful and will reward you. And you? You will deserve very much the reward I will give you for your fatigue, the work and trouble that my mission will cause you. Now my dearest son, you have heard my breath, my word; go now and put forth your best effort."
http://www.theotokos.org.uk/pages/approved/words/wordguad.html
Here is a link to the Wikipedia article. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Our_Lady_of_Guadalupe
I know that you probably will be unable to read it all. Of most interest is this paragraph -
Following the Conquest in 1519–21, the Spanish destroyed a temple of the mother goddess Tonantzin at Tepeyac outside Mexico City, and built a chapel dedicated to the Virgin on the site. Newly converted natives continued to come from afar to worship there, often addressing the Virgin Mary as Tonantzin.
Thus, you see, the Mexicans conflated Mary with their Mother Goddess, Tonantzin.
According to one of the sources cited in the Wikipedia article, "Tonantzin" means "Our Mother". I can't speak to the consciences of anyone, but there isn't anything wrong in itself with calling Mary "Our Mother". I think that's exactly who the Mother of God is. She--the highest of all creatures-- is Our Mother. If some were not understanding Catholic teaching well due to their recent conversion, or if they were still--like all of us--confused and sinful, I don't see how that in the least compromises the credibility of the apparition of the Mother of God to Juan Diego, nor of the beautiful, miraculous image that is still--inexplicably--still intact today. Christ came not for the righteous, but for sinners.
You seem to be making Patricius79's argument for him. ???You can be quite certain that Tonantzin, prior to the "conversion" of the Mexicans bore as much resemblance to Mary as Itzamna did to God, the Father.