- May 22, 2015
- 7,379
- 2,640
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Agnostic
- Marital Status
- Married
I didn't say it was immoral, I implied that it's inevitable that a finite can't see the absolute in anything like an absolute sense, but not because the absolute is hiding, rather man is just not equipped.
So then he could have equipped us better, but he chose not to. And the question isn't why we don't understand everything about God in an "absolute" sense, I don't think anyone would expect that. The question is why do we have to seek him. We could be better equipped to perceive him, and God chose to limit us in that manner.
Omnipotence does not mean God can or would do something contrary to his wisdom. God cannot create evil that is also good, or square circles etc.
"Contrary to his wisdom" just sounds like it wasn't part of his plan. Which just means it was a choice. If you really mean that God can't do things that aren't the best possible thing to do, then I would say that God doesn't have free will but is more of a force of nature than an intelligent being.
He wants us to find him in truth.
"He wants us to find him" means he chose to hide.
Upvote
0