Understand.Understand or believe?
I disagree with your assertion.Understand.
1 Corinthians 2:14 But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.
Sure.I disagree with your assertion.
Why don't you do your best to explain it.
Yes indeed.
I'm a believer that that kind of stuff is actually beaconing the spiritual world.
The Bloody Mary game, Ouija Boards and, dare I include it, D&D.
Some do think they are overreacting, but then, most scientists are Sadducees, in that they don't believe ...
Acts 23:8 For the Sadducees say that there is no resurrection, neither angel, nor spirit:
So it doesn't surprise me that they would come up with an alternate term such as overreacting.
Check.
Go on. Why do spirits need to be "beaconed?"
Emphasis on "benign"?Orthodox Christianity firmly rejects the existence of ghosts or benign spirits.
Can you explain the Maniac of Gadara from your perspective then?They do not, of course, Hitch. If someone does this they are essentially indulging the most base defilements of the human mind, opening the door to self-deception and general misery.
Emphasis on "benign"?
No room for fallen angels in your theology?
Can you explain the Maniac of Gadara from your perspective then?
So you're okay using adjectives like "demonic," but as a noun -- out of the question.Emphasis on benign, indeed. Certainly one does in yielding to the passions in this manner open oneself up to the most disagreeable demonic malevolence according to our monastic fathers. However, this malevolence does not need to be "beaconed," it is continually present and attacks us in accord with our passions and our own self-deception.
I'm confused.Well, from a strictly Orthodox perspective, the "general misery" I mentioned would include demonaic posession, which is distinct from mental illness.
We'll tackle this from inside our brains ... but thanks, anyway.It's just an optical illusion guys.
I'm confused.
Was the maniac of Gadara possed by fallen angels?
If you reject the concept of fallen angels, then where did that guy get his strength?
I'm totally lost here, Wgw.Yes.
I do not reject these; your post, when I read it, implied the existence of "spirits" and suggested to me you meant ghosts, good or bad. The Orthodox reject the existence of ghosts and regard attempting to communicate with spirits as inadvisable.
It's a manner of speaking. using tools like a Ouija board you alert them of your presence.Why would a demon need to be awakened?
I'm totally lost here, Wgw.
I believe some activities, such as Ouija boarding, D&D, and playing Bloody Mary get the attention of {fallen angels, ghosts, demons, things that go bump in the night, whatever you want to call them} and they attempt to respond accordingly.
HOWEVER, in this dispensation, they can only go so far, since the Holy Ghost keeps their activities in check.
The technical term for this is ontological subordination.
In some cases ... maybe 1% of the time ... they can "break through" and make contact with someone who engages in these activities with passion.
At this point, the user (or player) either becomes demon possessed, demon influenced, or "visited" in some other way.