What is so wrong with socialism?

Willtor

Not just any Willtor... The Mighty Willtor
Apr 23, 2005
9,713
1,429
43
Cambridge
Visit site
✟32,287.00
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
It seemed as if the poster I was replying to was hung up on the fact that the CEO made x-times what the employees made...

What's also true in other countries is that they're trying to achieve that goal with a "demonize the rich" mentality.

In the US, people have been sold on this false idea that the reason we can't have all of those things is because the rich are being stubborn about paying more in taxes. This notion that..."They're resisting paying 39% instead of 35%...that's why we have problems!"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_tax_rates

We have the 6th highest max tax rate in the world on our wealthy folks, and the highest corporate tax rate in the world.

I don't think the issue is needing even more money for distribution...I think the issue is that the government needs to have some accountability and make some smart decisions with the $3 Trillion they already get every year before going back to the well to get more.

Reign in military spending, end the costly war on drugs, stop some of the foreign aid, stop the massive subsidies and bailouts, stop spending money on expired programs (http://thehill.com/policy/finance/241304-mccain-highlights-billions-in-wasteful-government-spending)

All of these things are ways to free up funds they already have rather than having to go back and dip into peoples' wallets again.

I think the x times salary is a problem, but it's a different problem. And I don't have a solution for it.

How we pay for universal healthcare, care for the elderly and sick, house the homeless, etc., is a closely related issue. Certainly, things like heavy military spending, the war on drugs, etc., are all tremendous sinks. If we can pay for former programs by siphoning off the latter, I'm all for that.
 
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,141
Visit site
✟98,005.00
Faith
Agnostic
You aren't entitled to have others pay for your health care.


Ever heard of Medicare?

You aren't entitled to have others pay for your education.

Ever heard of public schools?

You aren't entitled to live off your neighbors.

Ever heard of corporate subsidies where money is taken from the middle class and given to millionaires?

You aren't entitled to benefit from resources that are not yours.

That happens every day that corporations make profit from the resource of labor.
If you want something, earn it. If you take it, you're a thief. Theft is a sin.
Coveting the wealth of others is a sin.
Hating those who are more successful in life is a sin.

Medicare is theft? Really?
 
  • Like
Reactions: stamperben
Upvote 0

Willtor

Not just any Willtor... The Mighty Willtor
Apr 23, 2005
9,713
1,429
43
Cambridge
Visit site
✟32,287.00
Faith
Presbyterian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
...

Ever heard of corporate subsidies where money is taken from the middle class and given to millionaires?

...

To be fair, I don't think anybody (except a handful of people) approves of that one. ;)
 
Upvote 0

interpreter

Senior Member
Mar 4, 2004
6,309
157
77
Texas
✟7,377.00
Faith
Anglican
It seemed as if the poster I was replying to was hung up on the fact that the CEO made x-times what the employees made...

What's also true in other countries is that they're trying to achieve that goal with a "demonize the rich" mentality.

In the US, people have been sold on this false idea that the reason we can't have all of those things is because the rich are being stubborn about paying more in taxes. This notion that..."They're resisting paying 39% instead of 35%...that's why we have problems!"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_tax_rates

We have the 6th highest max tax rate in the world on our wealthy folks, and the highest corporate tax rate in the world.

I don't think the issue is needing even more money for distribution...I think the issue is that the government needs to have some accountability and make some smart decisions with the $3 Trillion they already get every year before going back to the well to get more.

Reign in military spending, end the costly war on drugs, stop some of the foreign aid, stop the massive subsidies and bailouts, stop spending money on expired programs (http://thehill.com/policy/finance/241304-mccain-highlights-billions-in-wasteful-government-spending)

All of these things are ways to free up funds they already have rather than having to go back and dip into peoples' wallets again.
I disagree. We should be hard on the rich like Jesus was. We should not be satisfied with the 6th highest max tax rate and go for number one.

And that's partly because we should increase military spending, not decrease it like you say, because we are now fighting the Battle of Ar Mageddon (which began on 9/11 when the Euphrates was dry and is expanding around the world as prophesied). It is up to the US, the 4th horseman to rule the earth for Jesus, to kill the last of the enemies of Jesus, and we will, but it will no doubt be expensive.
 
Upvote 0

Jan Volkes

Well-Known Member
Jun 24, 2015
1,302
231
44
UK
✟2,674.00
Marital Status
Married
Politics
UK-Labour
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,141
Visit site
✟98,005.00
Faith
Agnostic
Nope, do you think the janitor has the same degree of responsibilities and liabilities?

Yes, the janitor does have the same degree of responsibilities and liabilities. Have you seen what happens when a CEO tanks a company? They get a golden parachute and bonuses.

Supply & Demand

If the skills you possess have a certain level of rarity, then you're able to get a higher level of compensation for them.

In terms of rarity, there's a tipping point...and that point is when you go from "competing with others to see who's going to work at a company"...to..."companies competing with each other to see who's going to be able to get you to work for them"

So it has nothing to do with a person's worth as a moral being?
 
Upvote 0

ThatRobGuy

Part of the IT crowd
Site Supporter
Sep 4, 2005
24,706
14,589
Here
✟1,204,856.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Yes, the janitor does have the same degree of responsibilities and liabilities. Have you seen what happens when a CEO tanks a company? They get a golden parachute and bonuses.

Are we talking norms or outliers? Do most CEOs have golden parachute clauses in their contract?

So it has nothing to do with a person's worth as a moral being?

In my mind...no.

I'm not hiring someone based on their moral being...I'm hiring someone to perform a predefined task.
 
Upvote 0

ThatRobGuy

Part of the IT crowd
Site Supporter
Sep 4, 2005
24,706
14,589
Here
✟1,204,856.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Upvote 0

ThatRobGuy

Part of the IT crowd
Site Supporter
Sep 4, 2005
24,706
14,589
Here
✟1,204,856.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
I disagree. We should be hard on the rich like Jesus was. We should not be satisfied with the 6th highest max tax rate and go for number one.

And that's partly because we should increase military spending, not decrease it like you say, because we are now fighting the Battle of Ar Mageddon (which began on 9/11 when the Euphrates was dry and is expanding around the world as prophesied). It is up to the US, the 4th horseman to rule the earth for Jesus, to kill the last of the enemies of Jesus, and we will, but it will no doubt be expensive.

Based on our 1st amendment, we shouldn't be doing anything based on "what Jesus would've done"...if someone want to embrace those ideals on a personal level, go for it...but won't don't dictate national economic policy based on a religion.
 
Upvote 0

Mediaeval

baptizatus sum
Sep 24, 2012
857
185
✟29,873.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
I think you must walk around with your eyes closed.
The government keeps millions of people alive with Medicaid and Medicare and a host of other government run programmes, would you have them drop all of those programmes?

Probably most people who are supported by such programs were forced to pay into it. I don’t begrudge them their benefits. Still, such inefficient programs should be ended or at least be made voluntary.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Mediaeval

baptizatus sum
Sep 24, 2012
857
185
✟29,873.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
Why is good quality health care only expensive in America?

In countries where the government runs the entire system, the citizens of those countries pay half of what we do, per capita, for health care. How do you explain that?

Subsidies. Here’s a better example, where the government runs the entire healthcare system and the people using it pay nothing whatsoever. It’s called the Veterans Administration. All by itself the VA is great argument for free-market healthcare.
 
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,141
Visit site
✟98,005.00
Faith
Agnostic
Are we talking norms or outliers? Do most CEOs have golden parachute clauses in their contract?

Yes.

When those different investment firms and banks caused the massive recession in 2008, guess what happened? They gave themselves bonuses. This was followed by a massive bailout on the backs of the middle class, and they gave themselves bonuses with that money too.

I'm not hiring someone based on their moral being...I'm hiring someone to perform a predefined task.

That's slavery.
 
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,141
Visit site
✟98,005.00
Faith
Agnostic
Subsidies. Here’s a better example, where the government runs the entire healthcare system and the people using it pay nothing whatsoever. It’s called the Veterans Administration. All by itself the VA is great argument for free-market healthcare.

How so?
 
Upvote 0

Mediaeval

baptizatus sum
Sep 24, 2012
857
185
✟29,873.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
And one likewise has a choice in whether they want to live in the US or not. People who don't want to pay their freight can go elsewhere.

But if you DO go through the gate and refuse to pay you will be arrested and carted off to jail. And then you'll be put on trial and you will lose and you will have the fees (and legal fees) forcibly confiscated from you.

Not everyone can pay to go elsewhere, especially when the government is taking such a large portion of their pay.

No one who respects private property is going to force themselves through that gate.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Cearbhall

Well-Known Member
May 10, 2013
15,118
5,741
United States
✟122,284.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Single
What is to be done is to seek for moral truth, not opinion. It is available. Your own conscience bears witness.
This is just more opinion, from my point of view. I respect your beliefs, but I disagree with them. I do not believe that objective morality exists.
Abolish the public schools! Let education be private for all and not only for the children of rich politicians!
I assure you, the offspring of rich politicians do not make up 10% of US children.
 
Upvote 0

interpreter

Senior Member
Mar 4, 2004
6,309
157
77
Texas
✟7,377.00
Faith
Anglican
Based on our 1st amendment, we shouldn't be doing anything based on "what Jesus would've done"...if someone want to embrace those ideals on a personal level, go for it...but won't don't dictate national economic policy based on a religion.
Christians control the US with their vote, and dictate everything the US government does. In that way they can impose their religious beliefs. If they want to make the US a socialist nation, they will.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

ThatRobGuy

Part of the IT crowd
Site Supporter
Sep 4, 2005
24,706
14,589
Here
✟1,204,856.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Christians control the US with their vote, and dictate everything the US government does. In that way they can impose their religious beliefs. If they want to make the US a socialist nation, they will.

Thus far, they haven't...in fact, Evangelical Christians in the US have largely supported the side that opposes socialism the most.
2nd, Christians no longer control the landscape to the same degree they used to in the US...the trends are shifting
upload_2015-8-5_18-17-14.png


However, the constitution does provide limitations...there's certain things that can't even be demanded by voters. (unless they can get enough support to repeal the first amendment...which is very unlikely)
 
Upvote 0