Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I think that admitting to doing wrong before anyone else knows about it is doing penance. Seeking help on your own is doing penance. Going to the police and turning yourself in when nobody knows, except your family, is doing penance. Facing those you wronged and asking forgiveness is also penance.What penance?
Police routinely close cases when there's no there there. From a legal perspective, maybe that was true.and the police covered it up. the whole thing stinks.
What leads you to believe that the girls were forced to forgive? I mean, the boy ratted on himself, did penance, and received forgiveness. The family took measures to prevent it from happening again, and it didn't, apparently.
I gotta say, forgiveness is a tough thing. I did something 10 years ago my wife hasn't totally forgiven me for, but I live with that. Josh has to live with what he did. But juvenile records should remain sealed.
Sorry, but I don't see the connection. How does harboring a criminal have anything to do with what Jesus said?Why, because they handled it the way Jesus said in Matthew 15:18 and following?
When the acts in question happened, he was. It's irrelevant.However, when the police report was taken Josh was not a juvenile.
The kid did something wrong. The parents confronted him, also led him to the authorities, and he submitted to whatever would happen to him. Then it never occurred again, as far as we know. If he continued, the next step was to cast him out.Sorry, but I don't see the connection. How does harboring a criminal have anything to do with what Jesus said?
Yet how many christians are in this thread defending them? You see, it isn't just the Duggars. Something has gone screwy with Christian culture. We have abandoned justice and have become enablers.That is exactly why I wanted to know about this case in particular. Because the overlying thing is that they are Christians, but these people are in a cult. They do all sorts of weird stuff in the name of Christianity, however their actions betray them and their hate speech is mortifying as it is full of accusations of a particular group of people that have no findings.
Even today, they take more care in covering up problems and trying to save their tv show, then showing Christianity. It's just a sick, sick situation.
I don't see anyone defending Josh Duggar for what he did. I do defend the parents for how they handled the situation. I think it was appropriate. I don't think we need to rely on the nanny-state government to discipline our children. They're too confused trying to figure out whether gay marriage is appropriate.Yet how many christians are in this thread defending them? You see, it isn't just the Duggars. Something has gone screwy with Christian culture. We have abandoned justice and have become enablers.
Yet how many christians are in this thread defending them? You see, it isn't just the Duggars. Something has gone screwy with Christian culture. We have abandoned justice and have become enablers.
I don't see anyone defending Josh Duggar for what he did. I do defend the parents for how they handled the situation. I think it was appropriate. I don't think we need to rely on the nanny-state government to discipline our children. They're too confused trying to figure out whether gay marriage is appropriate.
The dad has the authority, not the son. But those girls were asleep when they were molested, if that's the appropriate word.What kind of authority does a 15 year brother have?
I know what I saw in the interview, and all the analysis from those I trust in the news. I don't have time to go digging, because I'm not that interested. I caught a sniff on May 19 that something was up, but ignored it until the interview on Fox. I tend to stay away from world news.But didn't you say earlier that you really didn't know much about the situation? I find that interesting if that is indeed a fact. I don't want to put words in your mouth, so I am asking.
Everything you have listed above is what I would call confession. Penance is when you do something to either UNDO your sin or to COMPENSATE for your sin. Since he can't undo the molestation, penance would have to mean some kind of compensation/retribution/punishment. He started off right by turning himself in to the police, but this all went bad when the police decided to cover things up. Basically, penance would mean some sort of service to the girls or financial compensation to them, perhaps jail time or probation, in the old days it might have meant some kind of corporal punishment but we don't do that anymore. You get idea.I think that admitting to doing wrong before anyone else knows about it is doing penance. Seeking help on your own is doing penance. Going to the police and turning yourself in when nobody knows, except your family, is doing penance. Facing those you wronged and asking forgiveness is also penance.
We don't know what he might be doing financially or in service to those girls.Everything you have listed above is what I would call confession. Penance is when you do something to either UNDO your sin or to COMPENSATE for your sin. Since he can't undo the molestation, penance would have to mean some kind of compensation/retribution/punishment. He started off right by turning himself in to the police, but this all went bad when the police decided to cover things up. Basically, penance would mean some sort of service to the girls or financial compensation to them, perhaps jail time or probation, in the old days it might have meant some kind of corporal punishment but we don't do that anymore. You get idea.
When there's no case? He confessed! How was there no case? No, the police simply covered it up. They decided on their own that the girls hadn't been molested enough to warrant police involvement.Police routinely close cases when there's no there there. From a legal perspective, maybe that was true.
I'd bet money that if he were doing anything at all, they would be tooting their horns over it.We don't know what he might be doing financially or in service to those girls.
Meaning there was no case. Thanks for making my point! The police routinely close cases for insufficient evidence, lack of a will to press charges, etc. You call it a coverup if you want. Why aren't they investigating the police department, as many cities across the country seem wont to do???When there's no case? He confessed! How was there no case? No, the police simply covered it up. They decided on their own that the girls hadn't been molested enough to warrant police involvement.
Yeah, I had a similar problem with my son. He stole $600 from my purse and went and bought an X-box. I took him down to the police station with the intent to press charges (He was 16). The officer helped me out by giving him a tour of the jail, and enrolling him in a police boot camp, only pretending to make an arrest report, and in general scaring the heck out of my son, who then faithfully made it through boot camp with humility.You know, once, I found out my teen was stealing from a store-some pretty substantial value-items. I took him to the store with the items, found the manager and he admitted what he had been doing. He listed what he took, and made restitution. The store owner decided not to press charges, and that he had learned something from the experience. I never had the problem again.