dreiwerf I confess I did not really look over your sites because I already know what kinds of things will be there and it is tedious and time consuming to read through all the stuff. Plus as I said, you should articulate things for yourself.
I will take the time with your first link, though, to show you what is going on:
Here are some quotes that are totally typical of evolutionary literature: " its initial evolution
remains poorly understood. Using experimental evolution, we show that key steps in this transition
could have occurred quickly.... because the first steps in this process occurred in the deep past (>200 million years ago) (
9,
10). As a result, transitional forms have been lost to extinction [That's the real evidence - no transitional forms. How do you tell missing links from non existent links? You gotta have faith, brother!], and
little is known about the physiology, ecology, and evolutionary processes of incipient multicellularity....The fossil record shows that long periods of stasis are often punctuated by bursts of rapid evolution(
42),
presumably due to shifts in selective conditions and dramatic evolutionary responses."
Here again we see the Presuming Omniscience Fallacy about the past, , i.e. the faith factor rules, i.e. evolution just hasta be true so if we don't see the evidence it either happened too fast, or in some cases too slow!
The most important thing that everyone seem to not notice though, is that this is a study about snowflake yeast that........stayed snowflake yeast!
