I have come to the conclusion over the years that those who cannot grasp basic math and English become futurists.
I had to really think about what you are saying here. The calculations are so simple, I could not understand why you were miscalculating? But after studying what you wrote above, I understand.
You believe that verse 26 and 27 are completely separate verses, with one following the other in the order of events. But that is not proper grammar. Verse 26 and 27 are tied together with the conjunction "and"; so verse 26 does not conclude until verse 27 concludes.
I hope that makes sense. But just in case, try this:
1) Ignore the line numbers. The original Hebrew didn't have any line numbers. Those numbers were added by the translators (you should know that). Consider the verses as part of the same paragraph since they are connected with the conjunction "and" (you should know that, as well).
2) Ignore the confusion caused by the "threescore and two weeks" reference in 9:26. It has already been established in 9:25 that Christ arrived at the end of the sixty-ninth week; so he was cut-off (crucified) in the middle of the 70th week due to the length of his ministry. That is a fact that cannot be changed without corrupting the language.
3) Tie the related items together from the remaining sentences:
The only thing left to determine is how the last half-week of the 70 weeks fit into the picture. That was the half-week immediately following the crucifixion.
As I explained earlier, the only thing remaining that had a fixed time of fulfillment was the confirmation of the covenant with the children of Israel. The disciples performed the remaining half-week of confirmation, which was completed at the time they were sent to the Gentiles in Acts 10. After that, all who came to Christ (Jew and Gentile) were equally blessed by the new covenant.
.