Why Is Darwinism So Dangerous? (4)

[ihavefoundgod951]

Not really, sure, if things just suddenly popped into existence with no explanation of any kind, but that isn't what happens. The Cambrian explosion still took millions of years, it was just relatively "explosive" as far as evolution goes.

Is that your theory? (THEORY)

 

[PsychoSarah]

Is that your theory? (THEORY)

Gravity is also a theory, evolution being a theory which has more evidence to support it than gravity. Think on that a little bit, evolution, a theory more well supported than gravity. Let that sink in.

 

[ihavefoundgod951]

No need to 'believe' it - it's just the action of DNA at work, as it is in all organisms.

What do you regard as 'short' and 'long' periods of time?

For the skulls of human ancestors: 29 Evidences for Macroevolution: Part 1

For more general evidence for evolution: 29+ Evidences for Macroevolution: The Scientific Case for Common Descent

Sorry we have already discussed skulls, im not beating a dead horse going over old news. If you want to know my views about the skulls go back and read my posts in this thread.

My challenge is for someone to show me full skeletons of the transformation from monkey to human.

Come on they find dinosaur bones everyday, where are these monkey/human skeletons?

 

[PsychoSarah]

Sorry we have already discussed skulls, im not beating a dead horse going over old news. If you want to know my views about the skulls go back and read my posts in this thread.

My challenge is for someone to show me full skeletons of the transformation from monkey to human.

Come on they find dinosaur bones everyday, where are these monkey/human skeletons?

They aren't going to be monkey humans, human and monkey evolution split farther back. It is going to be a mix of human and more chimpanzee like traits, and we have that. Obviously not every single bone, but more bones than not.

 

[ihavefoundgod951]

Gravity is also a theory, evolution being a theory which has more evidence to support it than gravity. Think on that a little bit, evolution, a theory more well supported than gravity. Let that sink in.

Sorry but you are beating a dead horse preaching this stuff to me. Ive seen the evidence (you know that)

I reject it, it's sketchy.

 

[ihavefoundgod951]

They aren't going to be monkey humans, human and monkey evolution split farther back. It is going to be a mix of human and more chimpanzee like traits, and we have that. Obviously not every single bone, but more bones than not.

Show me

 

[bhsmte]

Sorry but you are beating a dead horse preaching this stuff to me. Ive seen the evidence (you know that)

I reject it, it's sketchy.

Do you reject all science, or just parts of science?

 

[PsychoSarah]

Show me

I will on one condition: you aren't a paleontologist, don't try to claim it is a normal human or a modern other kind of ape. Because you don't know bones, you don't know anatomy.

 

[PsychoSarah]

Sorry but you are beating a dead horse preaching this stuff to me. Ive seen the evidence (you know that)

I reject it, it's sketchy.

Your opinion of the evidence doesn't make the evidence go away.

 

[Davian]

There is no such thing as Christian atheists or Christian pantheists.

"Christian atheism is a theological position in which the belief in the God of Christianity is rejected or absent but the moral teachings of Jesus are followed."

Christian atheism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"The apostle Paul quotes a pantheist poem about Zeus in Acts 17:28, turning it into a panentheist statement about their "unknown God" when he quotes, "'In him we live and move and have our being' as some of your poets have said."

Panentheism is also a feature of some later Christian thought, particularly in mystical Orthodox Christianity, Catholic philosophy, and process theology. In order to avoid confusion with pantheism some panentheists now use the doublet "unitheism.""

Panentheism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I will also offer you this post, to refer you to CF's resident Christian panetheist (but don't tell him we are talking about him, or this thread will be overrun with his electrical universe nonsense), who may take offence at that statement.

There may be atheists that say they are Christian and pantheists that claim they are Christian those terms are totally contradictory.

I have said before, is there any position, however contrary to another, that someone somewhere cannot find support for in the bible?

Minor issues are minor and others are not.

My point is, you lack a mechanism with which to resolve these differences, 'minor' or not.

 

[ihavefoundgod951]

Do you reject all science, or just parts of science?

I agree with lots of science,, for instance I do agree that H2o boils at 100 degrees, that is a fact.

I believe in gravity, it's tangible, we can see it (apple falling on Newtons head)

Evolution theory, sorry not buying it, not enough evidence, (very sketchy)

 

[Davian]

I Don't see how any Christian that has read the bible can believe in evolution.
saying we evolved from fish contradicts what the bible tells us. If you believe the bible to be the whole truth, which most Christians do, how can you possibly believe in the evolution theory?

I don't see how anyone with a layman's level of understanding in biology, cosmology, geology, and physics can reject one of the most evidenced scientific theories. It is my understanding that it is better evidenced than gravitational theory. Do you reject gravitational theory?

 

[ihavefoundgod951]

I will on one condition: you aren't a paleontologist, don't try to claim it is a normal human or a modern other kind of ape. Because you don't know bones, you don't know anatomy.

I want to see side by side, a monkey skeleton, a half monkey half human x3 images(1000's years apart) and a full human skeleton

Thats the challenge if you choose to accept it

 

[PsychoSarah]

I agree with lots of science,, for instance I do agree that H2o boils at 100 degrees, that is a fact.

I believe in gravity, it's tangible, we can see it (apple falling on Newtons head)

Evolution theory, sorry not buying it, not enough evidence, (very sketchy)

The evidence isn't sketchy, so sorry that evolution is so gradual you can't typically see it in creatures such as humans. But we do see how it has impacted our DNA (thank you, Egyptian mummies) and we can even see that there have been significant DNA changes in humans over the course of a few thousand years.

 

[PsychoSarah]

I want to see side by side, a monkey skeleton, a half monkey half human x3 images(1000's years apart) and a full human skeleton

Thats the challenge if you choose to accept it

Sure, how about both the skeletons and illustrations to make the comparison easier?

 

[bhsmte]

I agree with lots of science,, for instance I do agree that H2o boils at 100 degrees, that is a fact.

I believe in gravity, it's tangible, we can see it (apple falling on Newtons head)

Evolution theory, sorry not buying it, not enough evidence, (very sketchy)

Do you go to a doctor when you are sick, or have been treated by a doctor and or been prescribed medications for illness?

 

[Loudmouth]

I want to see side by side, a monkey skeleton, a half monkey half human x3 images(1000's years apart) and a full human skeleton

Thats the challenge if you choose to accept it

What specific features would this transitional skeleton need to have?

 

[ihavefoundgod951]

Do you go to a doctor when you are sick, or have been treated by a doctor and or been prescribed medications for illness?

Please don't play the old medical science card. I've seen it all before.

Like a good chess player I think two moves ahead.

 

[PsychoSarah]

Please don't play the old medical science card. I've seen it all before.

Like a good chess player I think two moves ahead.

Did you know evolutionary theory is directly applied to certain medical practices?

 

[bhsmte]

Please don't play the old medical science card. I've seen it all before.

Like a good chess player I think two moves ahead.

Well, if you have been to a doctor, gotten any vaccinations or medicine there is some bad news. Much of the former, is based on the theory of evolution. Sorry.