- Feb 5, 2002
- 166,692
- 56,302
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
Right. That would had worked. Anybody that can read can see how the thread unfolded. Whatever.There exist addiction levels, so there must then also exist parameters of severity, or which one is worse. Nobody has argured that inappropriate content isn't as addictive as cocaine or heroin. The claim that it is was made but not supported. I am skeptical that it is correct.
I wouldn't say that I've studied inappropriate content addiction with any sort of academic rigor, but I have observed it and am certainly aware that it exists and is not something you would want a loved one falling victim to. Again, I am not saying that inappropriate content is less addictive than heroin or cocaine. I am saying that I think that a person that says it isn't in the headline of an article has a duty to back that statement up with something more than "inappropriate contentography can ruin relationships".
I don't think I've been nasty here and I don't get the accusation. I'm not being cruel. You don’t have to debate me on this topic. You could have merely said "Yeah, that isn't a defensible statement. Bad article." and moved on. We need to be very careful about the image we sell.
Upvote
0