• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Why dont SDA's and Sabbath keepers also keep the Feast Days of Leviticus 23 too???

Status
Not open for further replies.

mmksparbud

Well-Known Member
Dec 3, 2011
17,312
6,820
74
Las Vegas
✟263,478.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Others
Your post doesn't address the topic of the thread. The distinction you want to make merely attempts to explain why you dismiss the sabbath on one hand, and then embrace the sabbath on the other, and dismiss the annual sabbaths that are equally binding in the Law. This is inconsistent and shows that you can't divide the old covenant Law into artificial bits and pieces.

Besides, the greatest commandment found in the entire Law was spoken by Moses of his own volition (Matthew 22:36-38), and wasn't written onto tablets of stone nor placed into the ark of the OLD covenant.

<staff edit> We are not inconsistent, we have always declared the 10 commandments are to be kept, which includes the 7th day sabbath--and we have quoted dozens of times that the entire book of Hebrews explains what the old and the new covenant are--and nothing that requires animal sacrifices was needed after Christ, the true Lamb of God, laid down His life. It is His blood now that saves. It is clear, it is plain, it is simple, it does not require a college degree to understand. None of the 10 commandments, written by Gods own hand, requires an animal sacrifice. Christs blood is all the sacrifice we need--it is He that saves. It is He whom we love, honor and obey--as all the disciples did.

<staff edit>
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Upvote 0

VictorC

Jesus - that's my final answer
Mar 25, 2008
5,228
479
Northern Colorado
✟29,537.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
It's not my fault that you can not understand that what I posted is on topic--I do not dismiss the sabbath on one hand and embrace it with the other---You have fallen under "a strong delusion" and can not see clearly, the Holy Spirit can help you with that. We are not inconsistent, we have always declared the 10 commandments are to be kept, which includes the 7th day sabbath--and we have quoted dozens of times that the entire book of Hebrews explains what the old and the new covenant are--and nothing that requires animal sacrifices was needed after Christ, the true Lamb of God, laid down His life. It is His blood now that saves. It is clear, it is plain, it is simple, it does not require a college degree to understand. None of the 10 commandments, written by Gods own hand, requires an animal sacrifice. Christs blood is all the sacrifice we need--it is He that saves. It is He whom we love, honor and obey--as all the disciples did.

If you wish to fill your mind with irrational, wrong, downright insane statements about our faith, that's up to you. God bless.
Your posts devolve immediately into personal attacks. It is said that authorship is a window into the soul, and the view inside yours isn't pretty. Let's get past that and deal with the content of your post.

Your latest claim is that you can divide the Law, and just abide by the Ten Commandments and dispense with the rest. Well, you dismissed the burnt offerings and the requisite sacrifice of two lambs on the sabbath (Numbers 28:9-10). But we know that Exodus 35:3 prohibits lighting a fire and this is the reason Adventists don't cook on the sabbath. We also know that Leviticus 23:3 is where the call for a convocation on the sabbath is found, and is the reason Adventist go assemble in church. By your dismissal of the burnt offerings mandated to keep the sabbath HOLY (Exodus 20:8), you've also dismissed any reason to go to church on the sabbath - the Ten Commandments doesn't say anything about a convocation. The call for Holiness according to the Law accepts the entire Law. And, you've never offered any reason to dismiss the other sabbaths that are equally binding under the Law, which is what the OP addresses.

In your previous episode, you attributed an origin for the sabbath prior to Moses without any evidence. You showed a poor grasp of grammatical rules equally applicable to Hebrew and English, and ignored verbal tenses when it suits you. The result is that you can't distinguish God's rest from the periodic sabbath.

Now you show that you want others to leave God's rest, and revert to the sabbath that only foreshadows His rest. Leave Christianity, embrace the basic tenets of Judaism, keep a truncated sabbath that isn't HOLY according to the Law, and pretend that following rules God didn't even burden us with is going to please Him.

Yes, we read your posts. Yes, we understand your posts. What you call obedience is mere pretense that is easily seen for what it is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sophrosyne
Upvote 0
F

from scratch

Guest
It's not my fault that you can not understand that what I posted is on topic--I do not dismiss the sabbath on one hand and embrace it with the other---You have fallen under "a strong delusion" and can not see clearly, the Holy Spirit can help you with that. We are not inconsistent, we have always declared the 10 commandments are to be kept, which includes the 7th day sabbath--and we have quoted dozens of times that the entire book of Hebrews explains what the old and the new covenant are--and nothing that requires animal sacrifices was needed after Christ, the true Lamb of God, laid down His life. It is His blood now that saves. It is clear, it is plain, it is simple, it does not require a college degree to understand. None of the 10 commandments, written by Gods own hand, requires an animal sacrifice. Christs blood is all the sacrifice we need--it is He that saves. It is He whom we love, honor and obey--as all the disciples did.

If you wish to fill your mind with irrational, wrong, downright insane statements about our faith, that's up to you. God bless.
You single-handedly destroyed your Mat 5:17-18 argument.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sophrosyne
Upvote 0

mmksparbud

Well-Known Member
Dec 3, 2011
17,312
6,820
74
Las Vegas
✟263,478.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Others
Persoanl sttacks??!! Who you kidding??---We been called brainwashed wackos, cultists, liars, demons, not Christians (which is against the rules here, but nobody objects when it's us!--and much worse. We all will come before God, and those who teach others to go against His word will be judged for doing so---so you can think it's us that are in trouble--doesn't bother me.--You take everything and twist things around and are teaching everyone to diregard God's commandments--we'll have to wait and see what God says at the end. For me, I'll go on with what I read in His word, and you will go on with what you feel is right in His word. But please don't whine about attacks--the attacks here pretty hostile and aimed at us. The rules here state that we are not to call other Christian groups, non-chritian--we are recognized as Christian and these packs of half-truths, and downright lies isn't going to change that. You go your way--I'll go mine--God bless.
 
Upvote 0

LarryP2

Well-Known Member
Mar 13, 2014
1,237
88
✟1,841.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
We all will come before God, and those who teach others to go against His word will be judged for doing so---so you can think it's us that are in trouble--doesn't bother me.--You take everything and twist things around and are teaching everyone to diregard God's commandments--we'll have to wait and see what God says at the end. For me, I'll go on with what I read in His word, and you will go on with what you feel is right in His word. But please don't whine about attacks--the attacks here pretty hostile and aimed at us. The rules here state that we are not to call other Christian groups, non-Christian--we are recognized as Christian and these packs of half-truths, and downright lies isn't going to change that. You go your way--I'll go mine--God bless.

And therein lies the rub.

For Christianity, Jesus Christ is "the word" of God. For Adventists, the Bible is. For Christianity, the Bible is only a worthwhile learning aid insofar as it leads to Jesus Christ, the only reason the Bible even exists and the centerpiece and end-point of everything in it. For Adventists, the centerpiece of, and the reason the Bible exists is to reveal the Sabbath. For Christianity, the Resurrection is the be all and end all of EVERYTHING. Nothing else qualifies as a distant and remote second place. NOTHING!! For Adventists, the Sabbath is the reason the Bible exists and nothing else qualifies as second place.

If you can't stand the Bible and the only way that you will ever find out about Jesus's Resurrection is to accidentally glance at a billboard.......well then, every real Christian in the world would advise you to chuck your Bible into the dumpster and keep paying attention to billboards.

Christianity teaches that one can be saved if the only "Bible" someone has is John 3:16 on a 10 cent plastic pocket card, and they believe and follow that verse. Adventists teach that you can never be confident in your Salvation. You have to read and memorize thousands of pages out of Ellen White's 90 percent plagiarized books, and believe in the thousands of stitched and sculpted together half-verses and verses blatantly taken out of context that comprise the foundation of Adventism. They teach that you have to perfectly and without a hitch observe whatever the parts of the Old Testament Law that tickled Ellen White's fancy. Yet even if you can do THAT (which clearly nobody can and nobody ever has), you still have to constantly look over your shoulder and dread the oncoming train known as the Investigative Judgment. Adventists teach Daniel 8:14 is the most important verse in the Bible. Christianity teaches that John 3:16 is. Christianity teaches you can inadvertently glance at a billboard and read John 3:16 word for word and be saved before the light turns green. Adventism teaches: "You better get on the stick and memorize 800 pages out of "The Great Controversy" today.

I spent my first 22 years of life as a miserable, carping, carking hopeless Adventist; fearful, depressed, paranoid. So I know of what I speak. I spent 22 years, watching my family hatefully ridiculing and criticizing devout Christians for celebrating the Resurrection every Sunday and on Easter I listened as Adventists preachers hatefully and viciously railed and fulminated against deeply-devout Christians celebrating the Resurrection of their Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, smearing them as the "harlot of Babylon" and the "Harlot Daughters of the harlot of Babylon." Then they had the unbelievable gall to fantasize that these devout followers of Jesus Christ would one day wholesale murder Adventists for not attending Church on Sunday. We'll get to the Christians who really HAVE been murdered for their beliefs, here in a minute. I, and every other Adventist I know spent our lives ignoring the very existence of the Eastern Orthodox Church, which stands as a 2,000 year old, 300 million member towering, throbbing, and massive rebuke against everything Adventists teach and believe. Why oh why did Ellen White and Adventist "Sabbath Scholar" Samuele Bacchiochi completely ignore the Eastern Orthodox church, which has never wavered in its assertion that both Easter and Sunday were immediately celebrated in the first year after the Resurrection on the instructions of the Apostles?

Eastern Orthodoxy began intensely feuding with the Roman pope 1000 years before the Protestant Reformation, and unequivocally severed all ties with Rome more than 400 years before Martin Luther was a gleam in his father's eye. 800 years before Ellen White was born!!


Ellen White and Samuele Bacchiochi, strangely claim, that Eastern Orthodox Christians - who have been tortured, persecuted and slaughtered by the millions upon millions under three different fallen Empires - began worshiping on Sunday and celebrating Easter because the Pope ordered them to!!!!!

REALLY?

Come again? Eastern Orthodoxy willfully refused to obey the Roman Empire, the Ottoman Empire and the Soviet Union Empire, at the dreadful cost of millions upon millions of their followers and Priests being savagely murdered, brutally tortured and imprisoned. Their greatest churches have been turned into rubble and burned to the ground; forcibly converted to Mosques; locked up and the key thrown away under Soviet atheism for 70 years. The Patriarch of Moscow, on the orders of Lenin, was tied to the paddle wheel of a river boat and simultaneously beat and drowned to death for refusing to give the Church over to the communists. 1,000 Orthodox Priests were murdered in one single day after that. Let the following marinate in your mind just for a few seconds about the fate of the Eastern Orthodox in the early 1800s in Ottoman Turkey:

"Patriarch Gregory was taken out of the Patriarchal Cathedral on Easter Sunday, 1821, directly after celebrating the solemn Easter Liturgy, and hanged (in full Patriarchal vestments) for three days from the main gate of the Patriarchate compound by order of the Sultan; his body was then taken down and delivered to a squad of Jews who dragged it through the streets and finally threw it into the Bosphorus. Over 5000 Priests were then drug to the edge of the river, and systematically beheaded and their corpses mutilated for their refusal to renounce Christianity, in sight of the beloved and mutilated corpse of their Patriarch."
.....
"On the day of the hanging of Gregory V, three bishops and a dozens of other Greek Priests were quickly executed in various parts of the Ottoman capital. Among them were the metropolitan bishops, Dionysios of Ephesus, Athanasios of Nicomedia, Gregory of Derkoi, and Eugenios of Anchialos....They looted Greek churches and property, initiating a large scale pogrom. Around 14 Christian Churches suffered heavy damage, while some of them were completely destroyed. The Patriarchal complex also became one of the targets......On June 15, five archbishops and three bishops were executed. Additionally, in early July, seventy shared the same fate.....on May 3, the former Patriarch, Cyril VI, nine priests and twenty Christian merchants were hanged in front of the local Cathedral.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Patriarch_Gregory_V_of_Constantinople
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Consta...tions_of_the_Patriarch_and_the_Grand_Dragoman


"In 1922, in unprotected Smyrna, [Metropolitan Bishop] Chrysostomos said to those begging him to flee: "It is the tradition of the Greek Church and the duty of the priest to stay with his congregation."
......
On 9 September crowds were rushing into the cathedral for shelter when Chrysostomos, pale from fasting and lack of sleep, led his last prayer. The Divine Liturgy ended as Turkish police came to the church and led Chrysostomos away. The Turkish General Nouredin Pasha, known as the "butcher of Ionia", first spat on the Metropolitan and informed him that a tribunal in Angora (now Ankara) had already condemned him to death. A mob fell upon Chrysostomos and tore out his eyes. Bleeding profusely, he was dragged through the streets by his beard. He was beaten and kicked and parts of his body were cut off. All the while Chrysostomos, his face covered with blood, prayed: "Holy Father, forgive them, for they do not know what they are doing." Every now and then, when he had the strength, he would raise his hand and bless his persecutors; a Turk, realizing what the Metropolitan was doing, cut off his hand with a sword. Metropolitan Chrysostomos was then hacked to pieced by the angry mob."
http://www.serfes.org/orthodox/memoryof.htm

"The Army converged upon the Augusteum, the vast square that fronted the great church of Hagia Sophia Church whose bronze gates were barred by a huge throng of civilians inside the building, hoping for divine protection. After the doors were breached, the troops separated the congregation according to what price they might bring in the slave markets. Mehmed II allowed his troops to plunder the city for three days as it was customary. Soldiers fought over the possession of some of the spoils of war. According to the Venetian surgeon Nicolò Barbaro "all through the day the Turks made a great slaughter of Christians through the city". According to Philip Mansel thousands of civilians were killed and 30,000 Christians were enslaved or deported."(Orthodox Christians have been barred from the Hagia Sophia for about a 1000 years. For 600 years, it was desecrated as a mosque)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fall_of_Constantinople#Final_assault

If anything, the Eastern Orthodox would do the exact opposite of anything the Pope told them to do. If the Pope told the Eastern Orthodox to worship on Sunday, the EO would worship on Wednesday, or Thursday out of pure, mule-headed spite!! And they would willingly die rather than change that practice. They have proven that time and time again. Eastern Orthodoxy insists Sunday worship commenced the first week after the Resurrection. They began celebrating Easter at the one year anniversary of the Resurrection. Both Sunday Worship and Easter celebration came straight from the Apostle's mouths. These facts stand completely unrebutted and unmentioned in SDA history and literature.

"Bishop Behrigian (1869-1915) was born in Zara and became the primate for the Diocese of Caesarea/Kayseri in 1915. He was arrested by Turkish police upon his return from Etchmiadzin where he had just been consecrated bishop. Informed of his fate, the bishop asked for a bullet to the head. Deliberately ignoring his request, the police tied him to a "yataghan" where sheep were butchered an then proceeded to hack his body apart while he was still alive.

Father Chghladian was born in Tatvan. In May 1915, as part of the campaign of mass arrests, deportations and murders, the priest was tortured and displayed in a procession, led by sheiks and dervishes while accompanied by drums, through the streets of Dikranagerd. Once the procession returned to the mosque, in the presence of government officials, the sheiks poured oil over the priest and burned him alive.Bishop Efthimios of Amasia was captured by the Turkish police and tortured daily for 41 days. In the last days of his life he chanted his own funeral memorial until finally dying in his cell on 29 May 1921. Three days later a written order for his execution arrived........Metropolitan Gregorios of Kydonion remained with his church until the end, helping 20,000 of his 35,000 parishioners escape to Mytilene and other free parts of Greece. On 3 October 1922, the remaining 15,000 Orthodox Christians were executed; the Metropolitan was saved in order to be buried alive."

Who you going to believe about the origin of Christian Sunday worship? The Eastern Orthodox, or Seventh Day Adventists?

I won't keep you in suspense. Here's one hint:

In Memory Of The 50 Million Victims Of The Orthodox Christian Holocaust
http://www.serfes.org/orthodox/memoryof.htm

Wow. No effort whatsoever has been expended in any Adventist Sabbatarian literature to refute the unwavering claim of Eastern Orthodoxy that it began celebrating Christ's Resurrection on Sundays, just one week after the fact, at the instruction of the Apostles. And they celebrated the first Easter on the 1 year anniversary of the Resurrection, also obeying the explicit commands of the Apostles.

Wow.

Just Wow.

Adventists have been predicting for over 150 years that their long dark night of persecution is just around the corner, but for some reason it always seems to set on the Eastern Orthodox Christians instead. Just since Adventism was founded in 1863, more than 3.5 million Eastern Orthodox were murdered in the Armenian genocide, and at least 12 million more were murdered under Communism. Those are just two of the smaller massacres in the 20th century. For the Orthodox, relatively speaking, those were sunny days on the beach. 50 million members of the Orthodox church were murdered in just in the 1900s. I doubt the total membership of the Adventist Church since its founding comes anwhere near that number.

Here's an article discussing Christian persecution, written by one of Adventism's own theologians. I counted less than 10 Adventist Martyrs since the Church's beginning. Needless to say, Eastern Orthodoxy is not mentioned:
http://dialogue.adventist.org/articles/10_1_moon_e.htm

Adventists to this day wishfully pretend that 100's of their top theologians and thousands of their best pastors have not savagely renounced the absurd and anti-Biblical 1844 time-setting that Ellen White said is the basis for the Church's existence. Adventists wishfully pretend that the SDA Church has not fired 100s and 1000s of its best Christian theologians and pastors, who have denounced the Church's absurd and unbiblical interpretation of Daniel 8:14; and the ridiculous and unbiblical Investigative Judgment as nothing more than a fairy tale. The IJ is nakedly unbiblical, 180 degrees opposite of the Gospel, and nothing more than a face-saving lie to cover up the disastrous events of 1844. The Church's obsessive fixation on the Sabbath drastically denigrates the effect of the Resurrection and is completely OPPOSITE of the message of St. Paul. The SDA Church's laughable "interpretation" of Colossians 2:14-17 is absurdly the OPPOSITE of what it actually says!

You come onto a Christian forums website with "another Gospel" and expect everyone else to ALSO pretend that none of the above is true?

What were you thinking?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

VictorC

Jesus - that's my final answer
Mar 25, 2008
5,228
479
Northern Colorado
✟29,537.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Here's the content:
Your posts devolve immediately into personal attacks. It is said that authorship is a window into the soul, and the view inside yours isn't pretty. Let's get past that and deal with the content of your post.

Your latest claim is that you can divide the Law, and just abide by the Ten Commandments and dispense with the rest. Well, you dismissed the burnt offerings and the requisite sacrifice of two lambs on the sabbath (Numbers 28:9-10). But we know that Exodus 35:3 prohibits lighting a fire and this is the reason Adventists don't cook on the sabbath. We also know that Leviticus 23:3 is where the call for a convocation on the sabbath is found, and is the reason Adventist go assemble in church. By your dismissal of the burnt offerings mandated to keep the sabbath HOLY (Exodus 20:8), you've also dismissed any reason to go to church on the sabbath - the Ten Commandments doesn't say anything about a convocation. The call for Holiness according to the Law accepts the entire Law. And, you've never offered any reason to dismiss the other sabbaths that are equally binding under the Law, which is what the OP addresses.

In your previous episode, you attributed an origin for the sabbath prior to Moses without any evidence. You showed a poor grasp of grammatical rules equally applicable to Hebrew and English, and ignored verbal tenses when it suits you. The result is that you can't distinguish God's rest from the periodic sabbath.

Now you show that you want others to leave God's rest, and revert to the sabbath that only foreshadows His rest. Leave Christianity, embrace the basic tenets of Judaism, keep a truncated sabbath that isn't HOLY according to the Law, and pretend that following rules God didn't even burden us with is going to please Him.

Yes, we read your posts. Yes, we understand your posts. What you call obedience is mere pretense that is easily seen for what it is.
You single-handedly destroyed your Mat 5:17-18 argument.
And here's the reply:
Persoanl sttacks??!! Who you kidding??---We been called brainwashed wackos, cultists, liars, demons, not Christians (which is against the rules here, but nobody objects when it's us!--and much worse. We all will come before God, and those who teach others to go against His word will be judged for doing so---so you can think it's us that are in trouble--doesn't bother me.--You take everything and twist things around and are teaching everyone to diregard God's commandments--we'll have to wait and see what God says at the end. For me, I'll go on with what I read in His word, and you will go on with what you feel is right in His word. But please don't whine about attacks--the attacks here pretty hostile and aimed at us. The rules here state that we are not to call other Christian groups, non-chritian--we are recognized as Christian and these packs of half-truths, and downright lies isn't going to change that. You go your way--I'll go mine--God bless.
Nowhere did mmksparbud deal with the content.
Instead, she produced an endless stream of ad hominem and repeated claims already shown to be false. She also could not resist erecting a fallacious straw man regarding what I teach, after I pointed out that it is the Adventist distinctive to strip the Law of its Holiness.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
F

from scratch

Guest
Persoanl sttacks??!! Who you kidding??---We been called brainwashed wackos, cultists, liars, demons, not Christians (which is against the rules here, but nobody objects when it's us!--and much worse. We all will come before God, and those who teach others to go against His word will be judged for doing so---so you can think it's us that are in trouble--doesn't bother me.--You take everything and twist things around and are teaching everyone to diregard God's commandments--we'll have to wait and see what God says at the end. For me, I'll go on with what I read in His word, and you will go on with what you feel is right in His word. But please don't whine about attacks--the attacks here pretty hostile and aimed at us. The rules here state that we are not to call other Christian groups, non-chritian--we are recognized as Christian and these packs of half-truths, and downright lies isn't going to change that. You go your way--I'll go mine--God bless.
So does that justify this statement of personal attack by you -

It's not my fault that you can not understand that what I posted is on topic--I do not dismiss the sabbath on one hand and embrace it with the other---You have fallen under "a strong delusion" and can not see clearly, the Holy Spirit can help you with that.

Personally I see no value in such a statement on the subject of the discussion.

Now I'm not going to list the out right names I've been called nor the abuse of Scripture to manipulate and condemn by your sect.

I think one of the keys you state above are very correct other Christian groups. I must ask if your God (Jesus) can sin? If He can we certainly don't have the same Jesus (God). One of us isn't Christian.

You also talk about - packs of half-truths, and downright lies isn't going to change that. I wonder why what you say and practice doesn't agree with even the passages you base your beliefs on. Why is it you rely on and deny Moses for starters? You have at best no Bible author that agrees with themselves. This makes the Bible have no value in establishing the truth. Your Bible contradicts itself on every point you try to make.
 
Upvote 0

SAAN

Newbie
Apr 26, 2013
2,034
489
Atlanta, GA
✟96,185.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Persoanl sttacks??!! Who you kidding??---We been called brainwashed wackos, cultists, liars, demons, not Christians (which is against the rules here, but nobody objects when it's us!--and much worse. We all will come before God, and those who teach others to go against His word will be judged for doing so---so you can think it's us that are in trouble--doesn't bother me.--You take everything and twist things around and are teaching everyone to diregard God's commandments--we'll have to wait and see what God says at the end. For me, I'll go on with what I read in His word, and you will go on with what you feel is right in His word. But please don't whine about attacks--the attacks here pretty hostile and aimed at us. The rules here state that we are not to call other Christian groups, non-chritian--we are recognized as Christian and these packs of half-truths, and downright lies isn't going to change that. You go your way--I'll go mine--God bless.


In regards to" For me, I'll go on with what I read in His word,"...DO you observe the 7 Sabbath holy days listed in Leviticus 23 along with the Sabbath?
 
Upvote 0

mmksparbud

Well-Known Member
Dec 3, 2011
17,312
6,820
74
Las Vegas
✟263,478.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Others
In regards to" For me, I'll go on with what I read in His word,"...DO you observe the 7 Sabbath holy days listed in Leviticus 23 along with the Sabbath?


Why??---Christs death did away with animal sacrifices--keeping those requires animal sacrifices--Christs blood is the new covenant and all those laws requiring animal sacrfices have been done away with--the 10 commandments as written by the hand of God do not require animal blood---We keep answering the question, but you keep asking the same question---boring!
 
Upvote 0

mmksparbud

Well-Known Member
Dec 3, 2011
17,312
6,820
74
Las Vegas
✟263,478.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Others
And therein lies the rub.

For Christianity, Jesus Christ is "the word" of God. For Adventists, the Bible is. For Christianity, the Bible is only a worthwhile learning aid insofar as it leads to Jesus Christ, the only reason the Bible even exists and the centerpiece and end-point of everything in it. For Adventists, the centerpiece of, and the reason the Bible exists is to reveal the Sabbath. For Christianity, the Resurrection is the be all and end all of EVERYTHING. Nothing else qualifies as a distant and remote second place. NOTHING!! For Adventists, the Sabbath is the reason the Bible exists and nothing else qualifies as second place.

OK--I know how to copy paste now but not how to get just the quotes that are needed like you all can do--so this is the best way for me--

For SDAs--Christ is called "The Word"--He is the word of God--and nobody would know that if there had been no bible--God has given us the Bible

2Ti 3:16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:

It is through the bible that we learn of God, the Holy Spirit, Jesus Christ, our creation, our end, the history of Gods leading, the price Christ paid to save us from sin, everything we need is in there---without it, noone has any basis for their beliefs. It is through it that we can understand that the Holy Spirit does indeed speak to us. Without it--we don't know much except that for some there seems to be a higher power of some sort that seems to guide them and they have a very, very basic feeling of some wonderful, powerful Being out there, but enough so if they hear and follow that voice, they will be saved--but it's the bible that tells us just how great He is. That whole statement above is totally and completely false. Believe what you want.

Christianity teaches that one can be saved if the only "Bible" someone has is John 3:16 on a 10 cent plastic pocket card, and they believe and follow that verse. Adventists teach that you can never be confident in your Salvation. You have to read and memorize thousands of pages out of Ellen White's 90 percent plagiarized books, and believe in the thousands of stitched and sculpted together half-verses and verses blatantly taken out of context that comprise the foundation of Adventism. They teach that you have to perfectly and without a hitch observe whatever the parts of the Old Testament Law that tickled Ellen White's fancy. Yet even if you can do THAT (which clearly nobody can and nobody ever has), you still have to constantly look over your shoulder and dread the oncoming train known as the Investigative Judgment. Adventists teach Daniel 8:14 is the most important verse in the Bible. Christianity teaches that John 3:16 is. Christianity teaches you can inadvertently glance at a billboard and read John 3:16 word for word and be saved before the light turns green. Adventism teaches: "You better get on the stick and memorize 800 pages out of "The Great Controversy" today.


None of the above is true---Except for John 3:16.

I spent my first 22 years of life as a miserable, carping, carking hopeless Adventist; fearful, depressed, paranoid. So I know of what I speak. I spent 22 years, watching my family hatefully ridiculing and criticizing devout Christians for celebrating the Resurrection every Sunday and on Easter I listened as Adventists preachers hatefully and viciously railed and fulminated against deeply-devout Christians celebrating the Resurrection of their Lord and Savior Jesus Christ, smearing them as the "harlot of Babylon" and the "Harlot Daughters of the harlot of Babylon." Then they had the unbelievable gall to fantasize that these devout followers of Jesus Christ would one day wholesale murder Adventists for not attending Church on Sunday. We'll get to the Christians who really HAVE been murdered for their beliefs, here in a minute. I, and every other Adventist I know spent our lives ignoring the very existence of the Eastern Orthodox Church, which stands as a 2,000 year old, 300 million member towering, throbbing, and massive rebuke against everything Adventists teach and believe. Why oh why did Ellen White and Adventist "Sabbath Scholar" Samuele Bacchiochi completely ignore the Eastern Orthodox church, which has never wavered in its assertion that both Easter and Sunday were immediately celebrated in the first year after the Resurrection on the instructions of the Apostles?


I am very sorry for your years of misery--I have my own tale of woe as I went to all SDA schools and was baptized at 12--in the hopes that maybe then my father would leave me alone, instead I had to get my first abortion at 12--there are miserable Christians in every denomination--which took me a long time to discover as I thoroughly had no desire to have God in my life in any way. SDAs do not have the corner on hypocricy and evil--just as thousands, if not millionjs, of little boys molested by holy priest--every church has a boat load of unsaved holier than thous, which includes those in the highest of ranks, not just lay people. The Eastern Orthodoxy has not been ignored anymore than any other faith--And please remember that SDAs are not the ones that came up with the Babylon harlot as being Rome--look it up, it started way, way back by Catholic priests, even long before Luther was saying it! Tradition is not something that we place a great deal of value to--neither did Christ--the traditions of the Jews He was not happy with. Holy tradition doesn't matter if it goes against what the scriptures say.

Eastern Orthodoxy began intensely feuding with the Roman pope 1000 years before the Protestant Reformation, and unequivocally severed all ties with Rome more than 400 years before Martin Luther was a gleam in his father's eye. 800 years before Ellen White was born!!


Ellen White and Samuele Bacchiochi, strangely claim, that Eastern Orthodox Christians - who have been tortured, persecuted and slaughtered by the millions upon millions under three different fallen Empires - began worshiping on Sunday and celebrating Easter because the Pope ordered them to!!!!!

The Papacy was in place long before the Eastern Orthodxy--they fell away from them--that is well known--but it was still the 1st Pope Constantine that implemented Sunday worship which slowly took over as the day of worship as noone wanted to be associated in any way with the Jews and it was simpler to just go with Sunday ---Christianity has been slaughtered by the Romans and by every other government after them--and Catholics slaughtered every one who refused to bow down to them and when the Ptrotestants came into power, they slaughtered Catholics, every group insisting they were doing Gods will, including the Muslims who were/are doing Allahs will.

 
Upvote 0

mmksparbud

Well-Known Member
Dec 3, 2011
17,312
6,820
74
Las Vegas
✟263,478.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Others
If anything, the Eastern Orthodox would do the exact opposite of anything the Pope told them to do. If the Pope told the Eastern Orthodox to worship on Sunday, the EO would worship on Wednesday, or Thursday out of pure, mule-headed spite!! And they would willingly die rather than change that practice. They have proven that time and time again. Eastern Orthodoxy insists Sunday worship commenced the first week after the Resurrection. They began celebrating Easter at the one year anniversary of the Resurrection. Both Sunday Worship and Easter celebration came straight from the Apostle's mouths. These facts stand completely unrebutted and unmentioned in SDA history and literature.

They went against the Pope only after they fell away from them--the fact that both of you claim to have Apostolic directives for Sunday and Easter does not go with whst the scriptures say. Those verses that are used to indicate that, are not used in context and have all been disproved, but it is not accepted by either no matter what is proved. And there is no mention of bunnies and eggs as having anything to do with the Resurrection of Jesus Christ. We celebrate His resurrection, without it, we'd have no hope--we do not however, believe in the bunnies and painted eggs and baby chicks thing (though I am personnaly loath to deprive children of them, they are, after all, so very cute!)

Adventists to this day wishfully pretend that 100's of their top theologians and thousands of their best pastors have not savagely renounced the absurd and anti-Biblical 1844 time-setting that Ellen White said is the basis for the Church's existence. Adventists wishfully pretend that the SDA Church has not fired 100s and 1000s of its best Christian theologians and pastors, who have denounced the Church's absurd and unbiblical interpretation of Daniel 8:14; and the ridiculous and unbiblical Investigative Judgment as nothing more than a fairy tale. The IJ is nakedly unbiblical, 180 degrees opposite of the Gospel, and nothing more than a face-saving lie to cover up the disastrous events of 1844. The Church's obsessive fixation on the Sabbath drastically denigrates the effect of the Resurrection and is completely OPPOSITE of the message of St. Paul. The SDA Church's laughable "interpretation" of Colossians 2:14-17 is absurdly the OPPOSITE of what it actually says!

Don't know where you get your numbers--we've got 1,000s of the best theologians still going strong, and they come from every denomination known--including Catholic priests, Jews, And (cover your ears) Eastern Orthodoxy. You can disbelief in the IJ if you want--we get it from the bible--we've posted those verses on here countless times--and in 1844 there were no SDAs--there was a large group of many denominations who who all gathered together under Miller and were called Millerites, this movement was global in nature and not just in the US--it was in the Middle East (by a Jew no less) and in South America and even the UK--we, did, however, come from them. And EGW was not the first to advocate the sabbath, it was being observed by many of the Millerites (and other groups) who passed it on to her and many others. In no way does the Sabbath subtract from the Cross or the Resurrection--it elevates all that Christ has done and is going to do. We are not in a panic of Christs appearing but wait, quite eagerly and impatiently for it. I know of no SDA who is in a panic about the assurance of their salvation. Just please keep in mind that evil, bad manners, unstudied theology (along with the resulting errors in thinking and diarrhea of the mouth) are not the sole property of SDAs--every single denomination has them. I have seen many Catholic "theologians" on here who proudly claim many degrees after their name, make statements that their catechism states differently--oh, well---nobody's perfect!!--God bless!
 
Upvote 0

LarryP2

Well-Known Member
Mar 13, 2014
1,237
88
✟1,841.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Why??---Christs death did away with animal sacrifices--keeping those requires animal sacrifices--Christs blood is the new covenant and all those laws requiring animal sacrfices have been done away with--the 10 commandments as written by the hand of God do not require animal blood---We keep answering the question, but you keep asking the same question---boring!

You simply cannot read Colossians 2:14-17 that way. SDA Theologians have been caught with their pants down around their ankles on that one. Read Samuele Bacchiochi and later SDA Sabbath Bible experts as they hilariously grapple with a MASSIVE problem that was created by Ellen White's argument that only the Ceremonial law was "nailed to the cross." The church has essentially reversed itself on that issue, in essence, their own Bible scholars and theologians, by declaring that Ellen White was absolutely wrong about the cross ending the ceremonial laws and the other Sabbaths and Feast days, have branded her as a "false prophet."

It is amazing if they are not teaching you this current "Present Truth." You shouldn't have any difficulty accepting the "Present Truth," since Adventists have had many different "Present Truths" that were eventually abandoned and replaced.

If you are not being taught that all of the ceremonial laws, the monthly and yearly Sabbaths, the Jewish feasts and Temple ceremonies are still in effect, God help the SDA church. Since their own theologians have created the case for all of that from the Bible. If the church is not teaching you to do what their own Bible Scholars have found, then they are simply lying to you.

You must not be current on Adventist trends, because the Church Bible scholars have published at LEAST two major books indicating that ALL of the Feast Days and Old Testament ceremonies apply.

Big move going on with Adventist "Feast Keepers." They are the courageous and honest ones. You have to admire them. They are willing to follow the truth wherever it leads. They've realized they have to get rid of St. Paul and eliminate his Epistles and arguments out of the New Testament, since it is a HUGE roadblock where the Adventist movement needs to go next. The honest Adventists will eventually end up like Messianic Jews, who also have forthrightly rejected the writings of the Apostle Paul and branded him as a "false Apostle." Adventist Synagogues are starting to pop up where ALL of the Jewish ceremonies and rituals are being practiced.

Where have you been?

You need to get up to speed on what is happening in your own church. You don't want to go ANOTHER 150 years of allowing rank error. By not following all of the Old Testament ceremonies and rituals and all of the Sabbaths and Feast Days, it seems like no Adventist was saved during the first 150 years of the Church's life.

"For SDAs--Christ is called "The Word"--He is the word of God--and nobody would know that if there had been no bible--God has given us the Bible

2Ti 3:16 All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness:

"It is through the bible that we learn of God, the Holy Spirit, Jesus Christ, our creation, our end, the history of Gods leading, the price Christ paid to save us from sin, everything we need is in there---without it, noone has any basis for their beliefs."

The Church went 400 years before the Bible was even put together, and another 1400 years before the average person could afford to own one. And don't tell me that Ellen White figured out how the existing churches were wrong from her reading of the Bible. She said a beautiful young man that told her where to go in her visions. Which brings up another problem: She had visions and a beautiful young man sitting on her shoulder. You were not allowed to participate in those visions. You only have a Bible. And from the Bible, Adventist theologians have demolished every single major Church doctrine.

Adventist Bible scholars have thoroughly refuted and discredited what the beautiful young man told Ellen White. Adventist theologians and Bible scholars are the worst enemy the Seventh Day Adventist Church has ever contended with. From the Bible, they have decisively proved that Ellen White was just flat wrong on the Investigative Judgment; the Church's interpretation and use of Daniel 8:14; her views on the Old Testament ceremonies and Sabbaths; and most of all her "Prophetic" legitimacy.

Again, what rock have you been hiding under?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

VictorC

Jesus - that's my final answer
Mar 25, 2008
5,228
479
Northern Colorado
✟29,537.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Why??---Christs death did away with animal sacrifices--keeping those requires animal sacrifices--Christs blood is the new covenant and all those laws requiring animal sacrfices have been done away with
Here you openly confess that the Sabbath(s) has(have) been "done away with".
--the 10 commandments as written by the hand of God do not require animal blood-
And the Law Spoken by the Voice of God demands animal sacrifice, including the weekly Sabbath.
--We keep answering the question, but you keep asking the same question---boring!
All we see is that you have dispensed with ALL of God's Sabbaths and Holy Days given in Judaism, but can't quite acknowledge Christianity's affirmation of God's redemption from the covenant from Mount Sinai, which Moses called the Ten Commandments (Deuteronomy 4:13).
Adding insult to injury, remember that each time you refer to Exodus 20 this is the Oral declaration of the covenant from Mount Sinai. It wasn't until later that God wrote the contents of His covenant onto tablets of stone and handed them to Moses. And yet you dismiss God's Oral commandments through Moses on one hand, and embrace His Oral commandments on the other.

This illustrates your inconsistency in handling the old covenant Christianity isn't even bound to, as was pointed out before:
Your latest claim is that you can divide the Law, and just abide by the Ten Commandments and dispense with the rest. Well, you dismissed the burnt offerings and the requisite sacrifice of two lambs on the sabbath (Numbers 28:9-10). But we know that Exodus 35:3 prohibits lighting a fire and this is the reason Adventists don't cook on the sabbath. We also know that Leviticus 23:3 is where the call for a convocation on the sabbath is found, and is the reason Adventists go assemble in church. By your dismissal of the burnt offerings mandated to keep the sabbath HOLY (Exodus 20:8), you've also dismissed any reason to go to church on the sabbath - the Ten Commandments doesn't say anything about a convocation. The call for Holiness according to the Law accepts the entire Law. And, you've never offered any reason to dismiss the other sabbaths that are equally binding under the Law, which is what the OP addresses.
Do you really think that the Finger of God is Holy, and yet His Voice isn't?
That's the basis for your division of the Law, after all.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

VictorC

Jesus - that's my final answer
Mar 25, 2008
5,228
479
Northern Colorado
✟29,537.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Don't know where you get your numbers--we've got 1,000s of the best theologians still going strong... You can disbelief in the IJ if you want--we get it from the bible--we've posted those verses on here countless times
No, you don't get the IJ from the Bible, and it's some of Adventism's finest theologians who acknowledge that! Including Dr. Cottrell's experience when he was editing a part of the SDA Bible Commentary:
Raymond F. Cottrell said:
I first encountered problems with the traditional interpretation of Daniel 8:14, professionally, in the spring of 1955 during the process of editing comment on the Book of Daniel for volume 4 of the SDA Bible Commentary. As a work intended to meet the most exacting scholarly standards, we intended our comment to reflect the meaning obviously intended by the Bible writers. As an Adventist commentary it must also reflect, as accurately as possible, what Adventists believe and teach. But in Daniel 8 and 9 we found it hopelessly impossible to comply with both of these requirements.

In 1958 the Review and Herald Publishing Association needed new printing plates for the classic book Bible Readings, and it was decided to revise it where necessary to agree with the Commentary. Coming again to the Book of Daniel I determined to try once more to find a way to be absolutely faithful to both Daniel and the traditional Adventist interpretation of 8:14, but again found it impossible. I then formulated six questions regarding the Hebrew text of the passage and its context, which I submitted to every college teacher versed in Hebrew and every head of the religion department in all of our North American colleges---all personal friends of mine. Without exception they replied that there is no linguistic or contextual basis for the traditional Adventist interpretation of Daniel 8:14.

When the results of this questionnaire were called to the attention of the General Conference president, he and the Officers appointed the super-secret Committee on Problems in the Book of Daniel, of which I was a member. Meeting intermittently for five years (1961-1966), we considered 48 papers relative to Daniel 8 and 9, and in the spring of 1966 adjourned sine die, unable to reach a consensus.

The Commentary experience with Daniel already mentioned led me into an unhurried, in-depth, spare-time, comprehensive study of Daniel 7 to 12 that continued without interruption for seventeen years (1955-1972), in quest of a conclusive solution to the sanctuary problem. My objective was to be fully prepared with definitive, objective, biblical information the next time the question should arise during the course of my ministry for the church.

Among other things I memorized, in Hebrew, all relevant portions of Daniel 8 to 12 for instant recall and comparison (60 verses), conducted exhaustive word studies of more than 150 relevant Hebrew words Daniel uses, throughout the Old Testament, studied the Hebrew grammar and syntax in detail, made a minute analysis of contextual data, compared ancient Greek and Latin translations of Daniel, investigated relevant apocryphal and New Testament passages, traced Jewish and Christian interpretation of Daniel from ancient to modern times, and made an exhaustive study of the formation, development, and subsequent Adventist experience with the traditional sanctuary doctrine. Eventually I incorporated the results of this investigation into an 1100 page manuscript which I later reduced to 725 pages but decided not release for publication until an appropriate time.

The above considerations conclusively demonstrate that our traditional interpretation of Daniel 8:14, the sanctuary, and the investigative judgment as set forth in Article 23 of Fundamental Beliefs does not accurately reflect the teaching of Scripture with respect to the ministry of Christ on our behalf since His return to heaven. Accordingly, it is appropriate (1) to note wherein Article 23 is thus defective, (2) to revise the article so as to reflect Bible teaching on this aspect of His ministry accurately, and (3) to suggest a process designed to protect the church from this and similar traumatic experiences in the future.

Some of the concepts associated with the investigative judgment are, indeed, biblical, but the Bible itself nowhere associates them with an investigative judgment, for which there is no sola Scriptura basis whatever.
Note that when Dr. Cottrell gave the conclusion wherein "Article 23 is thus defective", this was when the SDA Fundamental Beliefs numbered 27, and not the present 28. This is the same as the present #24 for the Investigative Judgment.
 
Upvote 0

LarryP2

Well-Known Member
Mar 13, 2014
1,237
88
✟1,841.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Victor C;

Since you are obviously keen and up to date on political and theological "bimbo explosions" presently violently rocking the SDA Church to its core, I wonder if I could solicit an learned opinion from you.

It is plainly obvious that every Adventist pastor, administrator and seminary student knows how Bacchiochi has unintentionally demolished the long-standing Adventist views on the Sabbath. With his interpretation of Colossians 2:14-17, he also implicitly demolished Ellen White's nuanced theory of "nailing to the cross" only the ceremonial and ritual law that violated her gut feeling. They know that no later than 1888, Dudley Canright had proven beyond a reasonable doubt that the Adventist Sabbath doctrine was impossible, unbiblical, unhistorical, and undoible; assertions unintentionally supported by Bacchiochi's own research. They know Raymond Cottrell was forced to demolish the 1844 doctrine of the "Remnant Church," the 2300 days, and the Investigative Judgment doctrine as completely unbiblical and nothing more than an elaborate fairy tale. They know that Walter Rea and Morris Veltman, while both were working for the Church, proved beyond a reasonable doubt that Ellen White was a pathological liar, a shocking fraud, a false prophet and an outright thief. They know the sickening history of thousands of pastors, Bible Scholars and theologians who have been fired and publicly humiliated for having the honesty to expose the Church's lies and frauds. They know that as each and every single doctrine of Adventism has been demolished by their own Bible Scholars, that the General Conference has been rocked by massive financial scandals and wrongdoing. Logically, because they do not believe a word of what they preach, the GC officials have become immoral with a "seared conscience." It's money fraudulently earned anyway, isn't it?

They know that in 1919, the General Conference met for two days, trying to find a "solution" for the "Ellen White problem," after having sent that colossal embarrassment to exile in Australia. They know that 1919 General Conference chose to "kick the can down the road," and made extreme efforts to conceal their conviction that Ellen White was a fraud, a pathological liar, and a thief. They know that Ellen White time and time again wrongly predicted the future.

All of the preceding doctrines are the very basis for Adventism's original existence.

My question is: How do these Pastors, administrators and Seminary students deal with the mandatory cognitive dissonance? I appreciate many of them know they are telling lies and fairy tails, and are doing it only for the money. I actually have some sympathy for people who are forced by circumstances out of their control to behave that way. (Note: Cottrell didn't release his blockbuster IJ views until his retirement was safe in hand). There must be SOMEONE left that believes this crap. Otherwise, how can they possibly graduate from seminary and still think there is any reason for the church to exist? It seems to me that the honest ones have systematically eliminated St. Paul from the Bible; keep all of the feasts, Sabbaths and Old Testament temple ceremonies; build Adventist synagogues; reject Sola Scriptura and replace it with Sola Ellen White; and gung ho adopt Sinless Perfectionism.

Do you agree?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

VictorC

Jesus - that's my final answer
Mar 25, 2008
5,228
479
Northern Colorado
✟29,537.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Victor C;

Since you are obviously keen and up to date on political and theological "bimbo explosions" presently rocking the SDA Church, I wonder if I could solicit an opinion from you.

It is plainly obvious that every Adventist pastor, administrator and seminary student knows how Bacchiochi has demolished the long-standing Adventist views on the Sabbath. They know how Cottrell was forced to demolish the 1844 doctrine of the "Remnant Church," the 2300 days, and the Investigative Judgment doctrine. They know that Walter White and Morris Veltman, while both were working for the Church, proved beyond a reasonable doubt that Ellen White was a pathological liar, a fraud, and an outright thief. They know that Ellen White time and time again wrongly predicted the future. The preceding doctrines are the "Big Three" of Adventist Doctrine.

My question is: How do these Pastors, administrators and Seminary students deal with the mandatory cognitive dissonance? I appreciate many of them know they are telling lies and fairy tails, and are doing it only for the money. I have actually have some sympathy for people who are forced by circumstances out of their control to behave that way. (Note: Cottrell didn't release his blockbuster IJ views until his retirement was safe in hand). There must be SOMEONE left that believes this crap. How can they possibly graduate from seminary still thinking that way?
Well, no, I don't remain 'up-to-date'. But Andrews University produced many of those theologians Dr. Cottrell questioned, who admit "there is no linguistic or contextual basis for the traditional Adventist interpretation of Daniel 8:14". Why do they propagate this myth? That demands speculation, and the answers would vary among the individuals. Perhaps their paycheck forms the major motivation. But interviews among individuals who leave the SDA church list the Investigative Judgment as the leading doctrinal reason they leave, and I know current members of the SDA church who openly reject this doctrine exclusive to this one sect.

We have a former SDA pastor who is a member of the forum, who goes by the moniker Tall73. You could send him or his wife Sophia7 a PM, and they could give you a better insight based on their extensive inside knowledge and experience of Adventism.
 
Upvote 0

mmksparbud

Well-Known Member
Dec 3, 2011
17,312
6,820
74
Las Vegas
✟263,478.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Others
Since you've chosen to air dirty laundry out in the open, just how many abortions have you had?

If I choose to "air my dirty laundry", so what??--She had a long list of a terrible 22 years as an SDA so I told her a little of mine--I was out of the church for over 25 years because of it. If dirty laundry is unpleasant to you---why are you asking for more??
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.