The enormous difference with what the world means by welcoming and accepting is that the world - including this movement in the Boy Scouts - wants us to AFFIRM their passion and treat it as a normal and fine thing. I'm even having deja vu about having said this to you before. Surely you understand this difference??
I'm not sure what position you think the BSA has actually taken here. I have seen no affirmation of gay sex.
What you seem to dislike is the notion that you can be okay with being a homosexual. Well, here I flat out disagree with you. What you are advocating, then, is abusive and pathological.
This is condescending to homosexuals but I'll use it anyway for the purposes of this conversation: When you teach a teenager about masturbation, you don't tell them that their sexuality is totally depraved for having the disposition to do that sort of thing. You don't tell them that there is nothing good there whatsoever in that dynamic movement of the human person. What you do is tell them that to act out on certain behaviors is a misuse and abuse of what is fundamentally good.
The disposition that often sublimates itself in homosexual acts, though it is different from a heterosexual, is not by necessity evil and totally wrong. We can acknowledge that that same disposition, when redeemed just like our fallen heterosexual disposition, can contribute to the Church and to society in a way that is perhaps distinct or unique. Perhaps the particular way that redeemed eros shines through in a person like this will lead one to act positively in a way that they otherwise would not.
For example some of our venerated saints were homosexual, weren't they? Even if we don't know their names it is only sensible that this would be the case. Fr. Hopko mentions St. Symeon as having had "unnatural" passions in his youth, and he may have been one of those people. What if his disposition, when redeemed, allowed him to write his beautiful poetry to God in a unique way? We can't know for sure, but it's possible.
So to say that the entire disposition is just 100% corrupt and sinful as it deviates from fallen heterosexuality... I don't think you can say that. I think that's sort of a reductionist and small minded way of thinking that in a sense even denies the full salvific power of God to bring good out of everything.
In short, telling people they can be okay with themselves and their homosexual dispositions, insofar as they have that disposition and will deal with it the rest of their lives to their salvation or destruction, is not the same as advocating gay sex. The former does imply the latter.
It does not.
And I would rather live in a society where some fall into sins out of ignorance or poor instruction because the Christians were not ham-fisted, unmerciful and dishonest enough in their condemnations, than one where Christians crucify Christ again by driving pariahs into total destruction...
because at least in the former world there are still Christians. Ideally we would be right in the middle where everything is balanced so that nobody sins and nobody is condemned, but that's fantasy until the end of the Age.
I am an American Orthodox Christian, and I will see eleven guilty men go free before I see one innocent man falsely condemned. The tzars of this Age can make of that what they will.