• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Icons and the last few years on CF

Status
Not open for further replies.

MarkRohfrietsch

Unapologetic Apologist
Site Supporter
Dec 8, 2007
31,126
5,957
✟1,046,940.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Wrong on both counts. He was not 'teaching' the eucharist, he was responding to vis mentioning the eucharist in relation to who is a MJ and who is NOT, which IS the focus of this thread.

Not to mention, G's Messianic affiliation has LONG been mentioned, understood, and discussed. Each year you try to excommunicate him from the forum. Do you have him on ignore? or have you not read the many times he described how he is an assistant leader/deacon within a Messianic congregation? Or do you just blindly believe all the false claims about his NON affiliation with Messianic Judaism despite the years of defending himself here?

To claim you don't know 'which team' he plays for is quite rediculous at this point. Since his membership has been being questioned for years in the open forum by the anti-Christian members here.
From staff interaction over a year ago. Yet, eveyone here wants to continually question the validity of his membership here. As if he's only playing a MJ with an agenda. That is called slander, especially when you have been made aware of it over and over again.

Just a comment on the 'E' word being discussed, I have to say that that word turns my stomach, it always has, I can't explain why, but it does.

Anyway, seeing the amount of posts on this thread it seems that there are only a few people that have a dog in this fight. It should also be noted that those who aren't recognized members of this forum seem to have to get in on this.

Who Posted? Total Posts: 215
User Name Posts
Gxg (G²) 48
Avodat 25
visionary 19
Tishri1 16
Shimshon 14
dodari 12
Rachel Rachel 12
Steve Petersen 9
dnc101 8
yedida 6
LittleLambofJesus 6
ContraMundum 5
annier 5
anisavta 5
sacerdote 4
Lulav 4
HannibalFlavius 4
Norbert L 4
mishkan 2
talmidim 2
cyberlizard 1
netzarim 1
Philothei 1
ChavaK 1
sevengreenbeans 1

I've also noticed more icon changing, frankly I am tired of the branding. :(

That list you see ARE the members! All of us! 'We' are fighting for inclusion, to be acceped within the family. Not cast out of the camp, to be hung on a cross! Is that such a bad thing for a Jew to do?

Shimshon, the point you make is a good one.:)

Hi everyone, it's been a while since I've stopped by. I'm no longer on staff, but I do have a few questions that I would like to ask if it's OK; if not, let me know and I will leave.:)

The last time I was involved in a discussion similar to this one, was it not decided that while one's was a good indicator, being MJ in spirit, with a different Icon (for what ever the reason) was OK?

Regarding the 'E' word as Lulav put it; in reading your forums Statement Of Purpose (new) , it states:

7. We believe that the books of B'resheet (Genesis) to the book of Revelation to be the inspired word of Elohim. Any teaching that attempts to invalidate these books of the Bible as being the authoritative inspired word of God will not be acceptable here on the forum.
And...
*We believe the Bible, both the TaNaKh and Brit Hadashah (Torah, Prophets, Writings, and New Covenant), to be the inspired authoritative Word of God. Yeshua The Messiah is the memra, the very word of God (see Yochanan/John chapter1)

Scripture does account for it's celebration, and admonishes when it's used wrongfully; (while off topic to this thread) should not the discussion of it's nature be allowed among your members within this forum?

God's peace!

Mark:)
 
Upvote 0

Rachel Rachel

Messianic/Church of God 7th Day
Site Supporter
Apr 21, 2013
818
198
In the middle
✟373,556.78
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Constitution
Just a comment on the 'E' word being discussed, I have to say that that word turns my stomach, it always has, I can't explain why, but it does.

Anyway, seeing the amount of posts on this thread it seems that there are only a few people that have a dog in this fight. It should also be noted that those who aren't recognized members of this forum seem to have to get in on this.
<snipped>
I've also noticed more icon changing, frankly I am tired of the branding. :(


I've never used the "E" word, I was raised to call it communion.
And I'm so surprised to hear Messianics here say they don't believe in it. At every Messianic Seder I've ever attended, the Rabbi made it clear when we drank the cups of wine and ate the matza, that we were having communion. :confused:


 
Upvote 0

yedida

Ruth Messianic, joining Israel, Na'aseh v'nishma!
Oct 6, 2010
9,779
1,461
Elyria, OH
✟40,205.00
Faith
Marital Status
In Relationship
Hmmm? On my screen G shows gender, Oriental Orthodox cross, party, flag and so on. I dunno????????


In the last few weeks it seems he goes back and forth between no icon at all and an Oriental Orthodox icon. Currently, at last check a few minutes ago at the post just before this one that I am linking to, his icon is OO.

I agree with Ani, this is not fair to the rest of us who are obeying the site-wide rules, that he is allowed to come in here teaching and debating, and the mods/admins don't seem to want to inforce that rule. Does that mean we can go into the OO subforum teaching and debating against their SoP and not get any warnings or infractions against us? I'm really very curious about that.
 
Upvote 0

yedida

Ruth Messianic, joining Israel, Na'aseh v'nishma!
Oct 6, 2010
9,779
1,461
Elyria, OH
✟40,205.00
Faith
Marital Status
In Relationship
That list you see ARE the members! All of us! 'We' are fighting for inclusion, to be acceped within the family. Not cast out of the camp, to be hung on a cross! Is that such a bad thing for a Jew to do?

How can you consider yourself a "member" of this forum when you constantly post against the SoP of this forum and flame legitimate members? Just curiuos....
 
Upvote 0

yedida

Ruth Messianic, joining Israel, Na'aseh v'nishma!
Oct 6, 2010
9,779
1,461
Elyria, OH
✟40,205.00
Faith
Marital Status
In Relationship
I don't consider Jew haters, members, if that's the case...................

Neither do I. That's preposterous to think a Jew-hater would be a legitimate member of this Messianic Judaism forum! (And that poster is not the only one.)
 
Upvote 0

yedida

Ruth Messianic, joining Israel, Na'aseh v'nishma!
Oct 6, 2010
9,779
1,461
Elyria, OH
✟40,205.00
Faith
Marital Status
In Relationship
This statement concerning the Cross of Messiah is offensive, (in addition to being in opposition to Hebrews 13:12-13 and the mindset of what true talmidim-disciples should be and act like). I can only hope and assume that you did not mean it the way it sounds. Perhaps it is unwise for you to compare yourself to being "crucified" by this forum and its members because it is your doctrine that does not add up and likewise subverts the rules set forth for this particular faith group. It is not yourself that is being rejected but rather your doctrine and those "with you in your struggle for acceptance" (it is you who said "we" when you said you and your theologically minded friends are "fighting" to be accepted here). This is not a congregation but rather a little faith group in a large internet Forum with board rules. You and those "with you" have already shown, by the teachers and instructors whom you quote, praise, and link to in your posts, that your own theological mindsets are in agreement with that of Dr. Fruchtenbaum, (just an example of one of the more recently quoted scholars which I happened to notice) who clearly admits that the end result of his exhaustive labors was to conclude that all 613 commandments and Torah itself has been "rendered completely inoperative" and "completely invalidated" at the Cross of Messiah.

In truth what you and those in your camp are "fighting" for is tantamount to going to the Eschatology - Endtimes & Prophecy Forum, into the "Pre-Tribulation Rapture Believers Safe House" thread at the top of the page, and then proceeding to teach against the very things for which the safe house thread was created to begin with. Would your responses be the same in that board as they are here? when you would surely be asked to discontinue posting against the rules? Would you say to them: "If you loved your brother you would accept me as I am and let me continue to teach how false your rapture theories are" :confused: In other words your own arguments are "red herrings" and "straw man" false suppositions; the same things you have already accused me and others of doing elsewhere when it was not even true. It is not a "witch hunt" to inform someone that he or she is in rebellion against the rules when he or she is, in fact, in rebellion against the rules.

:thumbsup: Excellent observation.
 
Upvote 0

Avodat

Contending for Biblical truth
Jul 2, 2011
4,188
315
✟28,927.00
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Private
Shimshon, the point you make is a good one.:)

Hi everyone, it's been a while since I've stopped by. I'm no longer on staff, but I do have a few questions that I would like to ask if it's OK; if not, let me know and I will leave.:)

The last time I was involved in a discussion similar to this one, was it not decided that while one's was a good indicator, being MJ in spirit, with a different Icon (for what ever the reason) was OK?

Regarding the 'E' word as Lulav put it; in reading your forums Statement Of Purpose (new) , it states:


And...


Scripture does account for it's celebration, and admonishes when it's used wrongfully; (while off topic to this thread) should not the discussion of it's nature be allowed among your members within this forum?

God's peace!

Mark:)


Not for those who do not celebrate Mass, as your signature commends :)
 
Upvote 0

Avodat

Contending for Biblical truth
Jul 2, 2011
4,188
315
✟28,927.00
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Private
I would say yes there is no one higher than Tishri1 for this forum and no there is something higher than Tishri1 for this forum. Depending on how a person would box in their interpretation with context. But mostly no, there is an avenue for any CF member to take that goes higher than Tishri1.

http://www.christianforums.com/rules/#faq_rule_0

In particular the instructions from that page here below:






I am just as much as a Member of CF as any Messianic is, and given the topic, my input should be just as important as yours. If it comes across as telling you how to behave, that is definitely not the case. I just have a different opinion.



In my view more can be achieved by being given a warning from one person to another, rather than having to memorize more and more rules. Sorta like when a person is young and in school. They raise their hand and are all excited about giving an answer to the teacher and then find out they are totally wrong. Afterwards the student tends to remember what they should of said for much longer, it gets ingrained into their conscience. It's a much more effective approach imo.

Also given society at large, the more and more of dotting i's and crossing t's hasn't really solved problems between people. I think there's a lot to the words, 'you can't legislate behavior', nor when a person posts their comments.

You are not according to (this month's) rules a Member of these fora because nowhere in your signature, icon or text under your avatar, do you say you are a Messianic, therefore you are not - you are a guest here. Live with it!

House Rules:
All posts within this faith community must adhere to the site wide rules found here:
http://www.christianforums.com/rules/#faq_rule_0
In addition, if you are not a member of this faith group, you may not debate issues or teach, you may post in fellowship. Members may not teach against established MJ theology... Active promotion of views contrary to the established teachings of this group will be considered off topic and subject to staff action.



For your edification you are totally misrepesenting me, and the rule you quote in your post. Please refrain from misrepresenting me or report me for what you say is against the rules. To do the latter use the red button to the top right of the relevant post. If you continue in your campaign against me I will use the same button against you. So, in the words of your own post - you have been warned.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

yedida

Ruth Messianic, joining Israel, Na'aseh v'nishma!
Oct 6, 2010
9,779
1,461
Elyria, OH
✟40,205.00
Faith
Marital Status
In Relationship
Not for those who do not celebrate Mass, as your signature commends :)

Agreed! And teachings on celebrating mass should be confined to the subforums that actually do celebrate it, not here in the MJ subforum. If we are interested in getting more info on it, we know where to go and ask honest questions about it.
 
Upvote 0

yedida

Ruth Messianic, joining Israel, Na'aseh v'nishma!
Oct 6, 2010
9,779
1,461
Elyria, OH
✟40,205.00
Faith
Marital Status
In Relationship
I would say yes there is no one higher than Tishri1 for this forum and no there is something higher than Tishri1 for this forum. Depending on how a person would box in their interpretation with context. But mostly no, there is an avenue for any CF member to take that goes higher than Tishri1.

http://www.christianforums.com/rules/#faq_rule_0

In particular the instructions from that page here below:






I am just as much as a Member of CF as any Messianic is, and given the topic, my input should be just as important as yours. If it comes across as telling you how to behave, that is definitely not the case. I just have a different opinion.



In my view more can be achieved by being given a warning from one person to another, rather than having to memorize more and more rules. Sorta like when a person is young and in school. They raise their hand and are all excited about giving an answer to the teacher and then find out they are totally wrong. Afterwards the student tends to remember what they should of said for much longer, it gets ingrained into their conscience. It's a much more effective approach imo.

Also given society at large, the more and more of dotting i's and crossing t's hasn't really solved problems between people. I think there's a lot to the words, 'you can't legislate behavior', nor when a person posts their comments.

Yes, you are a member of CF, that has never been the problem, with you or anyone else with a different icon (or no icon). The problem and difference is that you (and those others) are NOT a bonafide, legitimate (as someone else coined ths phrase for this argument) member this forum, Messianic Judaism. And for this reason, neither you nor the others with different icons (or no icons) are allowed to teach/debate against what is clearly indicated in our SoP. I just don't understand what the problem is in understanding this simple site-wide rule, and our SoP is not that diffficult to understand either. :confused:
 
  • Like
Reactions: visionary
Upvote 0

yedida

Ruth Messianic, joining Israel, Na'aseh v'nishma!
Oct 6, 2010
9,779
1,461
Elyria, OH
✟40,205.00
Faith
Marital Status
In Relationship
You are not according to (this month's) rules a Member of these fora because nowhere in your signature, icon or text under your avatar, do you say you are a Messianic, therefore you are not - you are a guest here. Live with it!


For your edification you are totally misrepesenting me, and the rule you quote in your post. Please refrain from misrepresenting me or report me for what you say is against the rules. To do the latter use the red button to the top right of the relevant post. If you continue in your campaign against me I will use the same button against you. So, in the words of your own post - you have been warned.

That has been the problem lately. Others (with conflicting icons or no icons) come in here on a regular basis, they teach/debate against what is clearly written in our SoP and when we complain about it, we are the ones who get flamed and slander by them! This is totally unacceptable and terribly confusing to us. :confused:
 
Upvote 0

Avodat

Contending for Biblical truth
Jul 2, 2011
4,188
315
✟28,927.00
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Private
That has been the problem lately. Others (with conflicting icons or no icons) come in here on a regular basis, they teach/debate against what is clearly written in our SoP and when we complain about it, we are the ones who get flamed and slander by them! This is totally unacceptable and terribly confusing to us. :confused:


:thumbsup:
 
Upvote 0

Yahudim

Y'shua HaMoshiach Messianic
Site Supporter
Sep 30, 2004
3,993
622
Deep in the Heart of Texas
✟182,948.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Messianic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Shimshon, the point you make is a good one.:)
After all this time and you still don't get it. This is a Torah observant and Torah Positive forum. It is SUPPOSED to be a safe haven for those that are Torah Observant, Jew and Gentile alike. But because of the bashing that the Staff has apparently bought into, THIS IS TURNING INTO A FORUM WHERE IT IS NO LONGER A SAFE HAVEN FOR THE TORAH OBSERVANT! (Shouting from the rooftops)

Shimshon subscribes and PROMOTES a different theology than the SoP of this forum. He falsely claims that everyone is now a member of this forum. Tishri and you apparently agrees with Shimshon, that Torah has become irrelevant to the membership here. That is not what we agreed to. That is not what was promised.

There are a number of people that have suggested that the Everything Torah subforum is the place for Torah discussions. But they have tried to suggest that the Everything Torah subforum was the safe haven for the Torah Observant and that the main forum was not. However, that is not how the SoP was written. And again, it is not what was promised at the time and not what we agreed.

I view the anti-Torah 'creep' that has been allowed in this forum and its subfora, as well as the erosion of protections for the Torah observant from the onslaught of anti-Torah dogma - is an act of bad faith by the staff.

Hi everyone, it's been a while since I've stopped by. I'm no longer on staff, but I do have a few questions that I would like to ask if it's OK; if not, let me know and I will leave.:)

The last time I was involved in a discussion similar to this one, was it not decided that while one's was a good indicator, being MJ in spirit, with a different Icon (for what ever the reason) was OK?
You are mistaken. The end result was anyone could come and ask questions, but no one could claim membership here unless they subscribed to a 'Torah Positive' theology. Now membership seems to be open to anyone with a 'Torah is Irrelevant to Being a Good Messianic Christian' theology.

Regarding the 'E' word as Lulav put it; in reading your forums Statement Of Purpose (new) , it states:
7. We believe that the books of B'resheet (Genesis) to the book of Revelation to be the inspired word of Elohim. Any teaching that attempts to invalidate these books of the Bible as being the authoritative inspired word of God will not be acceptable here on the forum.
And...
*We believe the Bible, both the TaNaKh and Brit Hadashah (Torah, Prophets, Writings, and New Covenant), to be the inspired authoritative Word of God. Yeshua The Messiah is the memra, the very word of God (see Yochanan/John chapter1)

Scripture does account for it's celebration, and admonishes when it's used wrongfully; (while off topic to this thread) should not the discussion of it's nature be allowed among your members within this forum?

God's peace!

Mark:)
I suppose by 'it's celebration', that you mean Passover?While scripture records the events in question, how those events are interpreted fall to the different Denominations and Faith Groups here at CF. This is a concept that you are still having problems with, even after you left your staff position. Second, if has been determined that this topic is inappropriate for this OP.

Look at the bright side, Mark. At least you are consistent.
 
Upvote 0

Gxg (G²)

Pilgrim/Monastic on the Road to God (Psalm 84:1-7)
Site Supporter
Jan 25, 2009
19,769
1,429
Good Ol' South...
Visit site
✟211,037.00
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
In the last few weeks it seems he goes back and forth between no icon at all and an Oriental Orthodox icon. Currently, at last check a few minutes ago at the post just before this one that I am linking to, his icon is OO.
.
Your icon isn't showing on my screen, y :cool: But of course, that has happened for several multiple times over the years when it comes to screen glitches. If I wanted to be petty on the matter, I could easily say "See!!! yedida does not h ave an icon showing up so she must be going back and forth!!!!" - but things aren't so simple and that'd not be honorable.

Again, even computer screens glitch up and it's nothing new - and the icon has been consistently showing on for me (my icon) on my screen since I there's no need for not having an icon when I know my identification and have been comfortable with it, although on some postings it's not there alongside other things (something I had to ask others on if they experienced the same - and they confirmed such) .... and thankfully, it's why we have an "About Me" section and people keep up with postings so that they don't have a "The Sky is falling!!!"/alarmist reaction.
I agree with Ani, this is not fair to the rest of us who are obeying the site-wide rules, that he is allowed to come in here teaching and debating, and the mods/admins don't seem to want to inforce that rule.
Rule was enforced - although truthfully, it's not fair to the rest of others when the rules are violated in regards to judging other believers improperly, claiming others aren't "Messianic" as you are for differing - and flaming. That is a matter of quoting the rules while not really obeying them fully or wishing to square with where one does so.

This also goes for whenever there have comments by yourself saying one cannot be Christian and Messianic or claiming things about the Church being against Jewish believers which are not true (like where you said "jeeezus chariyst that the church seems to follow and worship is a myth" and other related commentary that goes against the SITE-Wide rules) - as that's also against the rules.

If wanting to talk on the rules, respect what the Mods already noted on icons - posting and what is or isn't said on Christians or the Church.
Does that mean we can go into the OO subforum teaching and debating against their SoP and not get any warnings or infractions against us? I'm really very curious about that
Logically - if you actually GO to an OO Parish or work with OO Believers/subscribe to their Christological views, of course you could work with them. And a little note: There are JEWISH believers working in the Messianic World who are also OO due to the overlap/commonality -and even they have been able to discuss Torah, God's Law and other things ....and they know how to not judge others when there's disagreement.

Daughter of Ararat (another member of the MJ Forum - #1 #5/ #6 #9/#12 & #14 ) can easily note that - as she is also an OO and Messianic. And there've already been talks over there on it ( some which I began and participated in when having a Messianic icon - and still join with noting openly my love for God's Torah/Jewish culture while identifying with OO culture as others do ).

Even Contra Mundum has experienced the same with discussion - as seen in the thread entitled Symbols in Judaism versus Icons in Christianity. What is the difference... ..

The same has occurred here, in regards to the Ethiopian Jews in Ethiopian Orthodoxy - well known for their Jewish lifestyle (i.e. Sabbath, Fasting, Kosher, etc.) - as occurred in one of the older threads on the MJ board entitled Messianic Judaism and Ethiopian Orthodoxy when it came to others living out a Jewish lifestyle in the Church (and the same in Reggae Righteousness: Seeing Ones that are both Messianic Jewish & Rastas for Christ? ).

So it's neither new nor impossible having discussion on Messianic issues elsewhere since a lot overlaps - and what's requested is that one be a part of the culture/appreciate it if they choose to share...or share in fellowship that doesn't attack what others believe. There's already understanding that there are differences/variations within the camp on certain things - and so we give grace to each other since we all hold to essentials.


However, if/when you have NEVER agreed with them - or wanted NOTHING to do with the Church/Christianity at all - that is where the rules forbid you from going in/teaching since you're not part of their world - and the same applies here when others want nothing to do with Messianic Judaism or valuing Jewish culture....yet wish to debate/teach. That is not allowed and shouldn't be - but that's not the same as others who value it while also working with the Church.....or being with Messianic Jews/Messianic Gentiles on one end of the spectrum with Torah Observance instead of on the other end of the spectrum which feels it is more "observant" than others - for the rules are already plain that there are differing levels of observance and people at differing spots.

People who don't want to be with others on one level of observance don't need to go into threads/postings by those who are for it - and likewise, others who feel some Messianics observe "less" than they do don't need to follow them around into the threads those Messianics make for others who are like-minded - or make claims against the rules like "They're just Christians!!!" (derogatory/flaming) or "They're not as Messianic as I AM!!!" since that's also not allowed.

Thus, sincerely, if wanting to talk on rules, one must be consistent in dealing with them as the MODS/CF have noted. People in the OO Forum are reasonable enough to do as the mods say and note that someone without an OO icon doesn't automatically qualify as not being OO since others do the same there as others have throughout CF - and people go by signature, "About Me" bio or posting content.

Simple as that ....just as it was for others here, be it ContraMundum, Daughter of Ararat, Desert Rose or several others over the years - and of course, the same for yourself.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

mishkan

There's room for YOU in the Mishkan!
Site Supporter
Dec 28, 2011
1,560
276
Germantown, MD
Visit site
✟85,950.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Scripture does account for it's celebration, and admonishes when it's used wrongfully; (while off topic to this thread) should not the discussion of it's nature be allowed among your members within this forum?

I'm of the opinion that nothing so big, bad, and scary that it shouldn't be allowed for discussion.

That said, Scripture documents Messiah celebrating a Passover seder. The later Christian reductionist practice of "communion" excludes the other seder elements, and radically transforms the practice to suit a theological agenda--an anti-Torah agenda.
 
Upvote 0

Gxg (G²)

Pilgrim/Monastic on the Road to God (Psalm 84:1-7)
Site Supporter
Jan 25, 2009
19,769
1,429
Good Ol' South...
Visit site
✟211,037.00
Faith
Oriental Orthodox
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
.:)Scripture does account for it's celebration, and admonishes when it's used wrongfully; (while off topic to this thread) should not the discussion of it's nature be allowed among your members within this forum?
Historically, as others have noted, it has ALREADY been brought up by nearly everyone complaining on it in the MJ forum at some point - be it in threads where they were asking QUESTIONS on it or threads where they shared their disagreements with it or engaged in debate with other Messianic Jews/Messianic Gentiles on it who did support it. Thus, it's inconsistent claiming that it has never been accepted within MJ culture and there is no logical (or credible) basis for trying to selectively switch in argumentation when it seems to suit the mood. If it is bad now to talk on it on the boards, it was bad THEN back in numerous documented times - and thus, everyone one has their hands guilty but crying out "innocent".

That'll never do.....nor is it something people concerned for Biblical observance of God's Torah should even be trying to bicker about since early Jewish believers in the 1st century were never against the concept of Eucharist (different from how many understand it today) - and many had to deal in their day with the reductionist practice of claiming communion was not connected with the seder elements (and forgetting that differences in practice do not equate to not being based in Torah/Historical Judaic practice). Communion, as it is, is another translation of the term "Eucharist" - and many go back/forth in the Jewish world with the terminology.

Where many sadly tried to radically transform the practice outside of its Jewish context to suit a theological agenda that was against the Torah, it's sadly the case today that many in the MJ Movement (just as with many in the Protestant Movement ) try to address that by reacting ...just like over-correcting with a car/going from one side of a ditch and into another off the road....and they end up divorcing themselves from how early Jewish believers saw the practice/Torah - making an creating a stance against Torah even as they claim they are trying to be against "anti-Torah" as they see it.

And sadly, it always seems to come down to the issue of people in the movement trying to separate from ANYTHING they see as Christian - and then going ultimately down the road of "You cannot be Messianic if you're a Christian" since they had a false view of what it meant to be Messianic...and forgetting that what Gentile Christians did with Real Presence/"Eucharist" (although not all, of course) was radically different in intent than how Jewish Christians saw things - and many NEVER had a mindset of throwing off the elements of the Seder or felt that the ceremony going along with it which developed later was against Jewish practice. So long as that is forgotten, people will always think they're fighting for one thing when in reality they're promoting the very thing they're against.


It's ironic....but that happens often with many things in the MJ movement - and many in the MJ Movement at large have spoken on it.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

mishkan

There's room for YOU in the Mishkan!
Site Supporter
Dec 28, 2011
1,560
276
Germantown, MD
Visit site
✟85,950.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
I've never used the "E" word, I was raised to call it communion.

And I'm so surprised to hear Messianics here say they don't believe in it. At every Messianic Seder I've ever attended, the Rabbi made it clear when we drank the cups of wine and ate the matza, that we were having communion.

Indeed, "Communion" is the common alternate English translation for "Eucharist".

Your surprise results from a perception based on your Christian upbringing. The traditional Passover seder includes a point at which those involved share a piece of matzoh. This practice was employed at Yeshua's own seder, as recorded in the Gospels.

Later, Gentile Christians threw off the elements of the seder, segregated the sharing of a random piece of bread into its own ceremony, and called that reductionist practice, "eucharist", or "communion".

In an attempt to relate to Christian visitors, Messianics will often use the terminology of "communion", but doing so is a sloppy and inaccurate use of the word. They use the word solely to be relatable to others.
 
Upvote 0

LittleLambofJesus

Hebrews 2:14.... Pesky Devil, git!
Site Supporter
May 19, 2015
125,549
28,532
75
GOD's country of Texas
Visit site
✟1,237,330.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
I've never used the "E" word, I was raised to call it communion.
And I'm so surprised to hear Messianics here say they don't believe in it. At every Messianic Seder I've ever attended, the Rabbi made it clear when we drank the cups of wine and ate the matza, that we were having communion. :confused:
Looking up that word in a concordance, this is what I came up with, and it is best to look up how each of the words, from the root word #2839, is used in the rest of the NT.
[This is just for info, not "teaching", so if any here feel like hitting the report button, inform me if it against the SOP of the MJ board].
Thanks and God bless :groupray:

Strong's Concordance with Hebrew and Greek Lexicon

Blue Letter Bible - Lexicon
Strong's Number G2842 matches the Greek &#954;&#959;&#953;&#957;&#969;&#957;&#8055;&#945; (koin&#333;nia), which occurs 20 times in 18 verses in the Greek concordance

1st time used:
Act 2:42
And they continued steadfastly in the Apostles' doctrine and fellowship, in the breaking of bread and in prayers.

2842. koinonia from 2844; partnership, i.e. (literally) participation, or (social) intercourse, or (pecuniary) benefaction:--(to) communicate(-ation), communion, (contri-)distribution, fellowship.
2844. koinonos from 2839; a sharer, i.e. associate:--companion, X fellowship, partaker, partner.
2839. koinos probably from 4862; common, i.e. (literally) shared by all or several, or (ceremonially) profane:--common, defiled, unclean, unholy.


.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.