Um, I personally believe that is pretty much how the Shroud image occured, but it is in no way scientific fact
It was caused by a burst of light from the body, that is a Scientific Fact.
Upvote
0
Um, I personally believe that is pretty much how the Shroud image occured, but it is in no way scientific fact
What is the definition of "fact" to you? It's obviously not the same as the one I'm using.How is it contradictory? Scientific Fact is that The Shroud was caused by a Burst of UV light By Jesus Of Nazareth's Body, Making it Supernatural and Proves for a Fact, He is The Christ, He is God Himself, God exists and The Bible is The Objective Truth.
You proclaim victory because you think it'll sway those who hasn't read the 'exchange'.I proclaim victory because, I was victorious.
I'm afraid you're not faring much better now. Calm down and argue rationally.Because it's true, look at how the pharisees got upset. as I kid I used to lose at everything and hated the truth, I know how it feels.
Here's some facts for you:Why? because I won? If an NBA player won the playoffs, he can boast and celebrate, however I win and debate and proclaim victory yet I look bad. more like you don't like that I won it. I'm not some average joe who you're going to sucker, alot of Brothers in Christ have been lost because of deception, fairy tale myths of "naturalism"/"atheism" were conned to them and unfortunately they didn't have the science to refute it where I not only have the great rebuttals to defend my arguments, but Facts to defend myself, Fellow Brothers in Christ who don't know it and The Word(The Holy Bible).
Lucky me I'm not an atheist then.Notice how I ended this whole topic with one post? This isn't my logic but Science, History, The Bible, Philosophy, Logical and The Holy Spirit working in me that I want other Brothers in Christ to have when defending Jesus Christ(God), that's how easy "atheism" can be refuted and thrown in the trash.
My previous post wasn't an attempt to argue against you, you would have noticed if you had read it properly.P.S. Actually attempt a rebuttal next time.
This is an example of your inexperience in debating. Mistaking a lack of response as a win. You might expect the same reasoning from a child.In other words I win, because you were incapable of refuting me, you refute everyone else, why not me?
No.Ok then, please prove how my arrogance is hilarious and are of insufficient calibre to be worth refuting.
That A has never been compared with B doesn't mean one is automatically superior to the other. You're confusing 'never beaten' with 'lost to'.In the meanwhile I'll prove why you know I'm proving The Truth:
1, you never beat me in a debate.
And this proves the Bible is true? If I slander the Qu'ran, will you start going to a Mosque? That you honestly believe this is a valid argument is why your posts are of insufficient calibre to bother refuting. Pearls, swine, etc.2, you slandered The Bible
You think you did, and you're incapable of seeing your error. This mental block of yours is one of the reasons I don't bother refuting your posts any more.3, I disproved "macro-evolution"
See (3).4, I proved that you're "nothing causing something" is an impossibility and that God can only be The First Uncaused Cause which you had no escape from a lost.
See (3).5, I proved Jesus Christ/God is a Scientifically proven Fact.
Indeed.your turn.
What do you mean its a "scientific fact"? On what are you basing this claim?It was caused by a burst of light from the body, that is a Scientific Fact.
What is the definition of "fact" to you? It's obviously not the same as the one I'm using.
I agree your definition seems to be "opinion", sorry my definition is is something that has really occurred or is actually the case.
You proclaim victory because you think it'll sway those who hasn't read the 'exchange'.
I proclaim victory because I simply was, The Victor, I provided irrefutable proof and Facts that you didn't respond to.
I'm afraid your not faring much better now. Calm down and argue rationally.
Calm down to what? see that sick tactic? It's like the kid who didn't get the girl but his friend did, so he tries to embarrass him, make him look bad, say lies, etc, what do I need to calm down from?
Here's some facts for you:
You did not "win".
I'm not trying to "sucker" you (whatever that means).
You haven't used any science in your arguments.
Prove it.
Lucky me I'm not an atheist then.
You did not end it though.
Ok then a B-agnostic, Biased "agnostic".
My previous post wasn't an attempt to argue against you, you would have noticed if you had read it properly.
I was trying to inform you of your lacking debating skills (including your behavior) and of an error you had committed.
No reason to reply to me other than a rebuttal, insulting me out of the blue saying I make myself look bad, which shows insecurity.
This is an example of your inexperience in debating. Mistaking a lack of response as a win. You might expect the same reasoning from a child.
Calm down and debate rationally.
So if someone doesn't reply, what other than waving the white flag does that prove?
Also, I am not calm, because I'm glad I won the debate.
Then I am not arrogant(confident, not arrogant, everyone should be confident in Christ, arrogance is wrong) and I am not of insufficient calibre, therefore I'm worth refuting, you have no excuse..
That A has never been compared with B doesn't mean one is automatically superior to the other. You're confusing 'never beaten' with 'lost to'.
Not only have you never beaten me, but I never lost to you and never finished a debate with you without me winning or you giving up.
And this proves the Bible is true? If I slander the Qu'ran, will you start going to a Mosque? That you honestly believe this is a valid argument is why your posts are of insufficient calibre to bother refuting. Pearls, swine, etc.
See that strawman-type tactic? I mentioned that you slandered The Bile to show you are not a good debater.
You think you did, and you're incapable of seeing your error. This mental block of yours is one of the reasons I don't bother refuting your posts any more.
Ok show me how so I could correct it, otherwise I'm right.
You're mistaken. That I won't prove those things to you doesn't prove that you aren't those things. You're committing the fallacy fallacy.Then I am not arrogant(confident, not arrogant, everyone should be confident in Christ, arrogance is wrong) and I am not of insufficient calibre, therefore I'm worth refuting, you have no excuse..
The latter is the only outcome of our exchanges - eventually, smacking one's head into a brick wall becomes boring. If you think that proves your claims true, that once more underlines the insufficiency of your posts.Not only have you never beaten me, but I never lost to you and never finished a debate with you without me winning or you giving up.
You mentioned I slandered the Bible because you genuinely think that proves your point. Ironically, it merely proves mine.See that strawman-type tactic? I mentioned that you slandered The Bile to show you are not a good debater.
Your dichotomy is false. If it happens that I don't post a refutation - perhaps I die by a freak meteor accident before I finish writing - that doesn't prove you right. Again, you're invoking the fallacy fallacy. Again, you're confusing apathy with inability.Ok show me how so I could correct it, otherwise I'm right.
Knowledge or information based on real occurrences. That's my definition of facts. So no, it's not "opinion".I agree your definition seems to be "opinion", sorry my definition is is something that has really occurred or is actually the case.
You provided with few facts and no irrefutable proofs.I proclaim victory because I simply was, The Victor, I provided irrefutable proof and Facts that you didn't respond to.
Your frantic repeating of proclaiming wins, for one. Then you have a clear aggressive tone to what you're writing.Calm down to what? see that sick tactic? It's like the kid who didn't get the girl but his friend did, so he tries to embarrass him, make him look bad, say lies, etc, what do I need to calm down from?
1. I don't prove things outside of mathematics.Prove it.
I'm biased, sure, however I dare say I'm less biased than you.Ok then a B-agnostic, Biased "agnostic".
Indeed, I am insecure about many things about myself, however that's not the reason I posted my response.No reason to reply to me other than a rebuttal, insulting me out of the blue saying I make myself look bad, which shows insecurity.
It doesn't prove anything. It might indicate several things though. One of them is that the person in question have better things to do that to argue with you. Another interpretation might be that he/she is sick of you.So if someone doesn't reply, what other than waving the white flag does that prove?
See the link provided in the bottom of my post.Also, I am not calm, because I'm glad I won the debate.
If You Can’t Prove Me Wrong, then I Must be RightThen I am not arrogant(confident, not arrogant, everyone should be confident in Christ, arrogance is wrong) and I am not of insufficient calibre, therefore I'm worth refuting, you have no excuse..
Not only have you never beaten me, but I never lost to you and never finished a debate with you without me winning or you giving up.
See that strawman-type tactic? I mentioned that you slandered The Bile to show you are not a good debater.
Ok show me how so I could correct it, otherwise I'm right.
Flaming
● Do not insult, belittle, mock, goad, personally attack, threaten, harass, or use derogatory nicknames in reference to other members or groups of members. Address the context of the post, not the poster.
● If you are flamed, do not respond in-kind. Alert staff to the situation by utilizing the report button. Do not report another member out of spite.