M
MattRose
Guest
OP,
Why are you beating the dead horse?
He's curious as to where the horse went?
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
OP,
Why are you beating the dead horse?
Does the bible teach that there is a hell of eternal torment in store for unbelievers?
According to Romans 6:23, the wages of sin is death, not eternal torment.
According to 2 Thessalonians 1:9, The penalty to be paid is destruction, not eternal torment.
According to the book of revelation, the lake of fire is the second death, not eternal torment.
According to John 3:16, the fate of those who reject Christ is to perish, not suffer eternal torment.
According to Ezekiel, the soul who sins will die, not suffer eternal torment.
According to Jesus Christ, the road is wide that leads to destruction. He said destruction, not eternal torment.
According to God (recorded in Genesis) the result of sin is death and being returned to dust, not eternal torment.
According to the bible, there is no hell of eternal torment, there is only life in Christ or death without Christ.
So you have never listened to another regarding your faith? Your "relationship" with the divine has been borne purely from yourself and the Bible?
Unlike other "belief" systems? All faiths, in very profound ways, make a distinction between "beliefs" and faith. And all deal in a relationship of some sort.
As far as your last comment, I have no answers to "life's questions" in the sense they could be amended by the latest best seller.
Really, pinkputter, stop this "superiority" game. It demeans you.
Instead of me going out to buy the book, being that I'm a little broke now (just lost the rest of my check in a poker game) why not give me a short synopsis of what his argument is? Because as far as I can tell there is no indication that points to a difference between the Greek word eternal in the same sentence...Hi elopez, Thomas Talbot, in his book "The Inescapable Love of God", deals with this very point. And comes to the conclusion that in fact the two references to "eternal" can indeed reference two different "durations".
Obviously you will wish to look this up, as the Book of Proverbs states "He who answers a thing before he heareth it, it is a shame and a folly unto him." So you will obviously wish to read Talbot's book - and his full argument - before repeating what you have just posted.
Oh ok so you say I'm playing a "superiority" game, while I'm getting messages from people saying I'm very understanding.
I'm rereading my last post addressed to you and I really have no idea how you could interpret that as me acting in a superior way.
The reality is, I don't think of myself in a superior way, and desperately wish you could see that I'm posting in a very sincere way. I genuinely wanted to know your thoughts to that question.
I'm not here to sugarcoat, and I'm sorry if that has led you to feel disrespected. This isn't the first time we've clashed tariki, but I do hope it's the last.
But, I do want to add this. This isn't "about me" It's about God. I'm not here to debate with people about their opinions of me on this forum. People (all nonbelievers) have been very generous with the insults and name calling, and that's not why I'm here. I try to see the good in others, and show them truth. Thats why I'm here.
Why not just start it yourself then?Because I asked him to start this thread up.
Right, I would agree so far as to either the Bible is unclear or one's interpretation is erroneous, but if it isn't the Bible and just the one it isn't God's fault. I quoted Matthew 25:46 for Scriptural evidence of an eternal punishment after death. That, to me, is clear as day. That makes it the others interpretation to be lacking in clarity, which again is not God's fault.Sadly, it seems that the Bible is, once again, unclear on what it teaches. That, or Christians are unclear on what the Bible is saying. Is it really such a hard thing to ask of a deity that they leave behind clear instructions?
I don't think the Bible is littered with such contradictions. Sure you can sit here and say that all day but why not just cut to the chase and actually show the contradictions? Why not be more reasonable than quoting some atheistic website that has been ridiculed?The only way to explain such differences of opinion on Scriptural interpretation as evidenced by this thread is that the Bible is littered with contradictions. And this is to be expected really, seeing as it was written by so many different authors over hundreds of years.
The correct translation is "eternal punishment." Not "eternal torment." That means final. The final punishment is death of the soul. A soul is both body and spirit. The words "Hell, Hades and Tartarus" was introduced into scriptures by the Catholics.
Hi elopez, I just have a question for you, do you think being judged an eternal death sentence in the face of eternal life can be considered "punishment"? (Don't mind Mr Grumpy, he's obviously disillusioned about eternal life).I quoted Matthew 25:46 for Scriptural evidence of an eternal punishment after death. That, to me, is clear as day. That makes it the others interpretation to be lacking in clarity, which again is not God's fault.
I don't think the Bible is littered with such contradictions. Sure you can sit here and say that all day but why not just cut to the chase and actually show the contradictions? Why not be more reasonable than quoting some atheistic website that has been ridiculed?
Many compare the Christian conception of the afterlife to the Greek Hades, where the Elysian fields are a rather happy place and Tartarus awaits those who've angered the gods, but I think the model is more likely to be found in Zoroastrian mythology and its distinctly dualistic qualities.
The Bible very accurately speaks of a potential relationship we can have with our God, and how we can expect things to work to that end. Why is that not enough?
Why does it matter to you?OP,
Why are you beating the dead horse?
It could be argued that if the unsaved suffer eternal punishment, and we understand (as many do) that the punishment is separation from God, then death as we normally understand it fits the bill. Death as both Christians and atheists agree, isn't temporary and is therefore (in this context) eternal.
The real argument is exactly how aware are the dead of their condition, not how long it lasts.
If you assume the soul can't die,Well, that,s the question.
Can a body without life feel anything?
A hand in a glove, if a glove is lying on a table, it is lifeless, when a hand comes into it, it starts moving about, when the hand is taken out of the glove, where does it go?
If the glove is the body, and the hand is the driving force,soul/spirit, if the soul/spirit cannot die, can it be seperated from it,s scource?
These kind of questions, I wonder over quite a lot.
1 Kings 7:26 (KJV): And it was an hand breadth thick, and the brim thereof was wrought like the brim of a cup, with flowers of lilies: it contained two thousand baths.
2 Chronicles 4:5 (KJV): And the thickness of it was an handbreadth, and the brim of it like the work of the brim of a cup, with flowers of lilies; and it received and held three thousand baths.
------------------------------------------------
2 Samuel 17:25 (KJV): And Absalom made Amasa captain of the host instead of Joab: which Amasa was a man's son, whose name was Ithra an Israelite, that went in to Abigail the daughter of Nahash, sister to Zeruiah Joab's mother.
1 Chronicles 2:17 (KJV): And Abigail bare Amasa: and the father of Amasa was Jether the Ishmeelite.
------------------------------------------------
1 Samuel 21:1 (KJV): Then David came to Nob to Ahimelech the priest.
Mark 2:25-26 (KJV): Have ye never read what David did ... How he went into the house of God in the days of Abiathar the high priest?
------------------------------------------------
Ezra 2:5 (KJV): The children of Arah, seven hundred seventy and five.
Nehemiah 7:10 (KJV): The children of Arah, six hundred fifty and two.
--------------------------------------------------
2 Samuel 10:18 (KJV): And the Syrians fled before Israel; and David slew the men of seven hundred chariots of the Syrians, and forty thousand horsemen, and smote Shobach the captain of their host, who died there.
1 Chronicles 19:18 (KJV): But the Syrians fled before Israel; and David slew of the Syrians seven thousand men which fought in chariots, and forty thousand footmen, and killed Shophach the captain of the host.
--------------------------------------------------
I don't think these things can be proven from the bible. (Which was the OP requirement, "does the bible teach...")
These are too easy to solve. Though I must admit, you'd have to do some reading of the accounts. Do you have any others that your holding onto, cause that isn't really enough of an excuse for your lack of faith.
Look, I'm not interested in trying to convert you to atheism, or even making you doubt your own precious Bible. Someone asked me to list some contradictions. I did. End of (as far as I'm concerned). I've actually done this debate a few times now and seen it done on other forums. No side wins. If you've got an axe to grind, take it up elsewhere.
And no, the contradictions in the Bible weren't the cause of me losing my faith. They certainly contributed to it but I gave up Christianity for a myriad of reasons, which is not the topic of this thread and therefore I won't go into them.
I didn't intend to offend. I apologize if I came across that way. I was kinda thinking you had an axe to grind and was going to offer myself as a sort of whipping boy, so to speak. I have found 2 of them not to be contradictions and felt no need to prove the others. I don't want to argue either. Besides, Im kinda exhausted, long night. God bless.