• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Ask a physicist anything. (5)

Status
Not open for further replies.

Wiccan_Child

Contributor
Mar 21, 2005
19,419
673
Bristol, UK
✟46,731.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
What is your favourite element (from the periodic table, of course), and why?
Hmm. So many, so many...

Hydrogen! So elegant, yet so commonplace. It powers the Sun and will power the next generation of human energy production. Ah, sweet hydrogen.

But my vote has to go to Proctaninium. Oh, element ninety-one, you capture both the heart and the imagination :)

I'm also interested in superheavy elements. Please could you explain them to me?
There're, like, elements, heavier than other elements, and then, like, some are heavier still. They're not just heavy, they're super heavy, man. Superheavy.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chesterton
Upvote 0
N

Nabobalis

Guest
Mine was an old Russian professor whose grasp of English... wasn't so good, to the extent that we had no idea what equations he was using. So I went away, derived the same result, and so we had a clear idea what all the terms meant.

I don't know if he was just mental, or if it's standard in Russian, but I couldn't for the life of me figure out what was going on :p

I have a Russian supervisor, he is huge! Kind of like shrek.
 
Upvote 0

mzungu

INVICTUS
Dec 17, 2010
7,162
250
Earth!
✟32,475.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Hmm. So many, so many...

Hydrogen! So elegant, yet so commonplace. It powers the Sun and will power the next generation of human energy production. Ah, sweet hydrogen.

But my vote has to go to Proctaninium. Oh, element ninety-one, you capture both the heart and the imagination :)


There're, like, elements, heavier than other elements, and then, like, some are heavier still. They're not just heavy, they're super heavy, man. Superheavy.
Ah the good old days of "Phlogiston", Dragons, and a flat earth! Actually I would not mind owning 100 kgs of Au.
 
Upvote 0

Supreme

British
Jul 30, 2009
11,891
490
London
✟30,185.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Hmm. So many, so many...

Hydrogen! So elegant, yet so commonplace. It powers the Sun and will power the next generation of human energy production. Ah, sweet hydrogen.

But my vote has to go to Proctaninium. Oh, element ninety-one, you capture both the heart and the imagination :)


There're, like, elements, heavier than other elements, and then, like, some are heavier still. They're not just heavy, they're super heavy, man. Superheavy.

I was reading in NewScientist (being the very scientifically literate gentleman I am), that the shortest lifespan of a superheavy element was a minute or so. I may not remember exactly, but it was something like that.

My favourite element is carbon. It's the most important element of life, with most of our bodies consisting of it- and I love the incredibly different isotopes, hydrocarbons and compounds it can form.
 
Upvote 0

Wiccan_Child

Contributor
Mar 21, 2005
19,419
673
Bristol, UK
✟46,731.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
I was reading in NewScientist (being the very scientifically literate gentleman I am), that the shortest lifespan of a superheavy element was a minute or so. I may not remember exactly, but it was something like that.
I'd say it was a fraction of a fraction of a second; a minute is quite long.

My favourite element is carbon. It's the most important element of life, with most of our bodies consisting of it- and I love the incredibly different isotopes, hydrocarbons and compounds it can form.
If our bodies are ~70% water, wouldn't that mean our bodies are mostly hydrogen/oxygen? :p
 
Upvote 0

Wiccan_Child

Contributor
Mar 21, 2005
19,419
673
Bristol, UK
✟46,731.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
Is that 70% by mass?
By volume, I think. I did some research (aka, Google); Oxygen is 3.5 times more abundant than Carbon by mass, and 2.6 times more abundant by number of molecules.

Hydrogen, being so light, is the third most abundant element by weight, but by number makes up 63% of the human body - unsurprising, since there are two atoms per molecule of water, and on average two per carbon atom. Hooray for Hydrogen!
 
Upvote 0

mzungu

INVICTUS
Dec 17, 2010
7,162
250
Earth!
✟32,475.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Oh the irony; That the much coveted by humans heavy elements are the last to be created in the cauldrons of the stars that die the violent death as supernovae which in turn are the very reason we exist today. The very elements that has brought such greed and power (gold, platinum, uranium, etc.) to the hearts of mortals. They are created only at the moment of death of the star and are released with the explosion!:angel:

Beautiful beasts these supernovae

YouTube - Supernovas: When Stars Die
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Supreme

British
Jul 30, 2009
11,891
490
London
✟30,185.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
By volume, I think. I did some research (aka, Google); Oxygen is 3.5 times more abundant than Carbon by mass, and 2.6 times more abundant by number of molecules.

Hydrogen, being so light, is the third most abundant element by weight, but by number makes up 63% of the human body - unsurprising, since there are two atoms per molecule of water, and on average two per carbon atom. Hooray for Hydrogen!

My bad. But carbon is the most important element for life. Carbon atoms bond with each other in long chains, the chains can be branched or join up as rings, and carbon elements bond with other important elements such as hydrogen or oxygen. And obviously, the linking of carbon to carbon in long chains is the backbone of important molecules.
 
Upvote 0

pgp_protector

Noted strange person
Dec 17, 2003
51,901
17,802
57
Earth For Now
Visit site
✟463,710.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Others
What is your favourite element (from the periodic table, of course), and why?
...snip...

Californium why? I'm from California :D

Though the wife like crystalline carbon.
 
Upvote 0

Steffenfield

Well-Known Member
Jul 9, 2010
2,645
937
✟6,993.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
Okay. You've probably seen the trick of blowing out a candle and then lighting the smoke to reignite the candle, yes?

So say your house is filling up with smoke due to some small fire going on and you have a candle that's lit next to your bed on your nightstand or something.

Once the smoke finally reaches this fire source, would your entire home immediately burn completely?
 
Upvote 0

Wiccan_Child

Contributor
Mar 21, 2005
19,419
673
Bristol, UK
✟46,731.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
UK-Liberal-Democrats
Okay. You've probably seen the trick of blowing out a candle and then lighting the smoke to reignite the candle, yes?

So say your house is filling up with smoke due to some small fire going on and you have a candle that's lit next to your bed on your nightstand or something.

Once the smoke finally reaches this fire source, would your entire home immediately burn completely?
The candle trick works because the column of smoke still has a lot of flammable particulates in it - mainly from the wick. These burn down until the wick itself is on fire, and, thus, the candle is relit. This only happens when the candle is blown out: the residual heat blows particulates out as smoke, but there's no flame to burn them. A fire would burn any fuel that might escape the flames, so lighting the smoke of a burning candle won't do anything.

If your home is on fire, the smoke is not unburnt fuel (e.g., wick, wood), but burnt fuel, so the smoke isn't going to catch fire any time soon. Moreover, the smoke in a real fire has a heck of a lot of CO in it, so the lack of fuel and oxygen means its unlikely to ignite.

So, a blown out candle is heavy in oxygen (a thin column of smoke has easy access to the O[sub]2[/sub] around it) and fuel (there's a lot of unburnt fuel in the smoke shortly after you blow a candle out), and so can be lit, eventually relighting the wick itself.
 
Upvote 0

Supreme

British
Jul 30, 2009
11,891
490
London
✟30,185.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Californium why? I'm from California :D

Though the wife like crystalline carbon.

They got lazy when they started naming elements like Californium, Americium and Germanium. I mean, names like oxygen and hydrogen at least required more imagination than the name of the place they were discovered.
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.