No. They would shun a concept like this because they think that it would lead to the basis of salvation being the work of the man . . . being that God chooses based on what He knows the man would do.
This fear is actually unwarranted if the concepts are lined right tho . . .
This is where I would disagree with some of my calvinistic brothers. BTW did u read that Word doc that I sent you?
My perspective, and I think it is the right one, is rooted in God's FIRST action of the cross. If God's first action is the basis for subsequent actions, then GOD is the ROOT and CAUSE and not man. If God chooses Christ FIRST and says, "yup, ur gonna die, and it will be to the end that I will wed these people to me in a way that cannot be had in any other way for my glory and their joy" . . . and then elects based on how He knows people will respond to the cross . . . then HE IS THE BASIS . . . and he places people in time and space based on this.
With this, God remains the author of salvation, salvation is based on HIM ALONE . . . not man . . . AND people's choices in the matter are considered. He doesnt harden people who would otherwise respond to Him, and all condemnation is just. He is neither arbitrary nor capricious and salvation belongs to Him. Predestination as the bible depicts it can be taken at face value (which would be the Calvinistic concept) . . . and mans freedom of choice can be as well.
The problem with calvin's predestination is that it doesnt go back far enough.
Evidences are
1. Jesus chosen to before the foundation of the world (meaning God planned for the fall)
2. The Gospel preached to Abraham
3. The Gospel being eternal
4. Justification being the same OT and NT (hence Paul speaks of Abraham as the EXAMPLE of NT justification before Jesus is even born)
5. The saved PREDESTINED to be vessels of MERCY (cross language, making mercy the PURPOSE that they are created, requiring the cross)
Read the doc I sent you