You didn't answer my questions, so I don't see why I need to yet answer yours.
Your whole objection (well, most of it anyway) is based on the idea that Satan can appear as an angel of light. How do you validate the apparitions and visions in the Bible, besides "it's in the Bible?" You have a case of circular logic if that's how you're justifying the validity of those apparitions and visions.
The correct answer is that you validate these apparitions against your faith, and the context of the Bible. You have faith that the Bible is true, as well a bit of extra-biblical historical evidence to back up that belief. To that same end, you have faith that these apparitions are true. They do not contradict doctrine and belief found elsewhere in Scripture.
You need much more solid position than the vague possibility that it might possibly perhaps be Satan in order have a good objection to these apparitions. The Church recognizes that visions may be demonic, just like you. The only difference is that the Church is willing to actually test the vision against Scripture and Tradition in order to determine if it's demonic.
Upvote
0
