Answering questions on Evolution

[Loudmouth]

I asked you first.

And I'm not asking for an example --- I'm asking for three specific names.

By law, corporations can be considered a legal person so three persons who are not mutants are Home Depot, Walmart, and 7-11.

If you want to include mythological characters we can include Batman, Robin, King Arthur (I'm sure Merlin's magic prevented mutation of Uther's seed).

 

[Bushido216]

Wow. You've really gone off the deep-end. Have fun in fairy land. Be sure to write.

 

[AV1611VET]

By law, corporations can be considered a legal person so three persons who are not mutants are Home Depot, Walmart, and 7-11.

If you want to include mythological characters we can include Batman, Robin, King Arthur (I'm sure Merlin's magic prevented mutation of Uther's seed).

This is so sad. This should have been answered already.

 

[Skaloop]

This is so sad. This should have been answered already.

Adam and Eve and someone else (Satan, maybe? Or Lilith?)?

The Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost?

 

[AV1611VET]

Wow. You've really gone off the deep-end. Have fun in fairy land. Be sure to write.

That attitude right there, Bushido, is why you can't understand.

 

[AV1611VET]

Adam and Eve and someone else (Satan, maybe? Or Lilith?)?

Try Michael, Gabriel, and Lucifer.

The Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost?

Would not apply, since I didn't capitalize "persons".

 

[Loudmouth]

This is so sad. This should have been answered already.

We all know you are shooting for the mythological Trinity, but watching you dance around like a child is good for amusement.

BTW, mythological characters do not have DNA and . . . well, they don't exist.

So I guess we can add other non-mutant persons. We have Achilles, Leprechauns, Santa Claus, Flying Spaghetti Monster, Zeus, Loki (my personal favorite), and Thor. I can keep going if you want.

 

[Loudmouth]

This is so sad. This should have been answered already.

We all know you are shooting for the mythological Trinity, but watching you dance around like a child is good for amusement.

BTW, mythological characters do not have DNA and . . . well, they don't exist.

So I guess we can add other non-mutant persons. We have Achilles, Leprechauns, Santa Claus, Flying Spaghetti Monster, Zeus, Loki (my personal favorite), and Thor. I can keep going if you want.

 

[Skaloop]

Try Michael, Gabriel, and Lucifer.

They're angels, right? So not "persons."

 

[AV1611VET]

We all know you are shooting for the mythological Trinity...

No, you don't know that.

... but watching you dance around like a child is good for amusement.

You're making yourself look bad, Loudmouth, not me.

 

[AV1611VET]

They're angels, right? So not "persons."

Angels aren't persons?

 

[Skaloop]

Angels aren't persons?

Nope. Persons exist, which precludes angels from being persons.

 

[AV1611VET]

Nope. Persons exist, which precludes angels from being persons.

I'll leave you to your ... misinformation.

 

[Split Rock]

Wow, 32 posts and not one creationist has asked a question about evolution yet. I guess they don't have any....

 

[AV1611VET]

Wow, 32 posts and not one creationist has asked a question about evolution yet. I guess they don't have any....

Why should we have questions?

It doesn't exist, and Paul warned us not to mess with it, or we would get "spoiled".

 

[Split Rock]

Why should we have questions?

It doesn't exist, and Paul warned us not to mess with it, or we would get "spoiled".

I thought all creationists accept the "micro" variety of evolution... heck, I'm sure they discovered it and it was stolen by that racist Darwin!

 

[Meshach]

I have lots of questions. But if the answer to my first one is "yes" then it is pointless to ask anymore.
Question number 1:
Are the answers given to any question I might ask about evolution going to be answered be fallible man?

fallible
1. capable of being mistaken; erring
2. liable to mislead

 

[Bushido216]

So, you're not willing to accept evolutionary theory because it is described to you by other human beings who can be fallible.

By that criteria, your cars engine is a myth.

Plastic doesn't exist.

The computer you're reading this on is a lie.

And you get the point.

If you applied the same bizarre rigours to evolutionary science as you did to everything else, you'd have utterly no reason to accept anything in this world as valid.

 

[Meshach]

So, you're not willing to accept evolutionary theory because it is described to you by other human beings who can be fallible.

By that criteria, your cars engine is a myth.

Plastic doesn't exist.

The computer you're reading this on is a lie.

And you get the point.

If you applied the same bizarre rigours to evolutionary science as you did to everything else, you'd have utterly no reason to accept anything in this world as valid.

Exactly my point. Now apply this to the Bible.

 

[Bushido216]

So...

You're suggesting that the Bible is a reported by fallible men and therefore unreliable?