So... since it didn't pop up until the 1300's... whatcha think of this "cloth that was the burial shroud of christ"?
Do you think it's real? Sham? Somewhere in between?
Do you think it's real? Sham? Somewhere in between?
COMPLETE SHAM.So... since it didn't pop up until the 1300's... whatcha think of this "cloth that was the burial shroud of christ"?
Do you think it's real? Sham? Somewhere in between?
So... since it didn't pop up until the 1300's... whatcha think of this "cloth that was the burial shroud of christ"?
Do you think it's real? Sham? Somewhere in between?
then why would science and researchers not take this into consideration at all? (if it's so well established)
I'm supposing that they are looking for documented things outside just a church realm (hehehe, but that's just one of my guesses)
If it was known to the Orthodox church, why didn't they claim it and care for it instead of allowing the son of a Templar to sell it to the highest bidder as a show piece?
Okay, I looked up the Edessa thing, from what I understand it only mentioned the face and not the whole body... ???
I'm just giving you a hard time. (Because I know you'll argue with me)
I know less about the shroud than I do about physics (and that's very little) hehehe
I would however, prefer documentation and more indepth information than just short commentary if you're going to assert something as fact Orth
but that doesn't even exist anymore, how can you possibly link the two?