nobdysfool
The original! Accept no substitutes!
- Feb 23, 2003
- 15,018
- 1,006
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Private
- Politics
- US-Constitution
Quoted by NBF:She is "correc", only because she supports "RT". The fact remains that Jesus chose all twelve and ordained that they would bear fruit which remains.
No, yourself, Ben. MamaZ is correct.Quote:Yes, that's true. Those who Jesus "ordains to bear fruit" --- how many kinds of fruit can they bear?
Yes, indeed. Your problem is that you think that there was only one fruit.
Can they bear SINFUL fruit???QUote:The English definition of "ordained", is "decree/establish/enact". The GREEK in Jn15 ("tithemi") is "set-forth, establish, ordain".
His sin was prophesied, therefore it was pre-ordained.
Did Jesus DECIDE Judas would sin?Quote:Can you explain the difference between "ordain", and "foretell"?
Prophecy deals with certainty, not chance. It was prophesied that Jesus would be betrayed. So it is clear that this sin was ordained to happen, prophesied to happen, and Jesus chose Judas, knowing that it was Judas who would betray Him. Jesus did not choose Judas "in the hope" that Judas would not betray Him.
When Jesus said "I chose all twelve, and ONE is a devil", was He not answering Peter's promise NOT to leave? Please explain how Jesus was not saying "ANY of you COULD leave".Quote:Why would Jesus choose a non-repentant reprobate as a Disciple?
It was a deliberate choice, made with full knowledge of what would certainly happen, with full knowledge of that certainty.
Do you think He does that today? Does He "ordain men's sin", or was Judas just a special case?Quote:Jesus came to DESTROY sin. In Jesus there is no sin. Please explain then how Jesus could ORDAIN/PREDESTINE sin.
So the answer to #2 is an unequivocal "YES"
How is that not a contradiction?Quote:How do you accommodate 1Jn3:5?
Given the answer to # 2, NO. Judas was chosen to bear BAD FRUIT, which remained.Quote:I recognize that Judas was forekown. I recognize that Jesus was put in a time and place where He would be crucified. But I recognize that God chose NO sin of ANY man.
Can you deny that Judas played an integral part in the events leading up to the Crucifixion? Can you deny that the Crucifixion was fore-ordained to happen, given all the prophecy in the OT about it? Was the crucifixion predestined? Scripture says "YES".Quote:Just like He prayed to the Father that PETER'S faith not fail? "100% effective means" is not what Jesus said; in answering Peter, Jesus was clearly saying, "Yes, you could".
In reality, this has nothing to do with Judas directly. But, the answer to the question is, while there was the potentiality of the other eleven leaving, the actuality was that they didn't, and Jesus knew they wouldn't. He asked them the question, not because He didn't know, or needed to know, but to elicit from them an affirmation of faith in Him.
What about the OTHER DISCIPLES that left? Were they "UNSAVED DISCIPLES"? And in Acts20:30, are THEY "unsaved disciples being drawn away from where they never WERE"? When will you begin to see the contradictions?Quote:With sincere respect --- I would much rather be accused of "close-mindedness" and "blindness", than to suggest that my Lord Jesus caused/ordained sin.
Your canned answers show just how close-minded you are, and how much you refuse to see. Your questions are slanted and do not correctly state the problem.Quote:And more's the pity --- that your understanding of Jesus is that He could, and did ordain ANY sin, EVER.
Reformed Theology answers it just fine, Ben, The problem here is that you refuse to accept any answer that does not agree with your already-decided-on outcome, which is flawed. You ask, nay demand, answers to questions that you have no intention of ever considering those answers as anything other than fodder for you to shoot at. You refuse to be corrected about anything. You refuse to accept that you could have missed the Truth on anything. This is amply demonstrated by the record of posts and interactions with you going back literally years, and can be confirmed by any number of other posters here.
He did not, He could not.
"Jesus came to DESTROY sin; in Him there is no sin." Never would He ordain it. Not in all eternity.Quote:"Wrongly" --- just because they conflict "Reformed Theology". But you just embraced a Christ who ordains sin.
Bottom line, it is your theology that leaves questions unanswered, or answers them wrongly.
There is a universe of difference between "foreknew", and "ordained".
Ben, your answers are so twisted and so full of double-speak, it is pointless to try and untangle that mess. My post to you was direct, simple, and biblical. Sorry you can't handle it. Your view is ridiculous, convoluted, and wrong.
I stand by my words.
I see that you have, in essence, denied that the Crucifixion of Christ was fore-ordained. That is in direct opposition to scripture, and you need to repent of your false statements denying it.
Upvote
0