What would it take for Orthodoxs to come under Pope

[katherine2001]

The Orthodox Church will never come under the Pope. It would happen when you know where freezes over. The two churches would only come together if the Roman Church gives up its errors and will agree only to be the Patriarch of the Church of Rome and not the universal head of the Church. The Church of Rome again would only be one see of the Orthodox Catholic Church.

 

[Trento]

Hi. I would like to ask what it would take for the Orthodoxs to once again come under the Reign of the Pope? Thanks.

Before 2012 between the Months of March and May Jesus himself will bring all Christianity together under Peter.

 

[LittleLambofJesus]

Before 2012 between the Months of March and May Jesus himself will bring all Christianity together under Peter.

How do the Orthodox feel about that?

 

[ScottBot]

Hi. I would like to ask what it would take for the Orthodoxs to once again come under the Reign of the Pope? Thanks.

Faulty premise. They will tell you they were never "under" the Pope.

 

[ScottBot]

Before 2012 between the Months of March and May Jesus himself will bring all Christianity together under Peter.

December 21, 2012 (if you believe the Mayan calendar hooplah).

 

[ScottBot]

The Orthodox Church will never come under the Pope. It would happen when you know where freezes over. The two churches would only come together if the Roman Church gives up its errors and will agree only to be the Patriarch of the Church of Rome and not the universal head of the Church. The Church of Rome again would only be one see of the Orthodox Catholic Church.

We don't have any errors to "give up". The Orthodox would have to once again recognize, as the ECFs once did, that the unity of the Church is made manifest in the chair of Peter.

 

[LittleLambofJesus]

We don't have any errors to "give up". The Orthodox would have to once again recognize, as the ECFs once did, that the unity of the Church is made manifest in the chair of Peter.

One is of Peter, one is of Paul, but all in all we are One with Jesus.

http://www.scripture4all.org/

Jonah 3:1 And a word of YHWH is becoming unto Jonah, a second-time, to say, 2 `Rise! go! to Niyn@veh, the city, the great and call to her, the call which I am speaking to thee;'

Acts 9:15 Said yet toward him, the Lord , `Be you going!, that a vessel of choice is to Me this one,of the to bear the Name of Me in sight of nations and kings--sons besides of Israel;

 

[OrthodoxyUSA]

How do the Orthodox feel about that?

Forgive me...

 

[christianmomof3]

Forgive me...

is that being under the chair of Peter?

 

[OrthodoxyUSA]

is that being under the chair of Peter?

Frightened... under a chair.

I am Antiochian... I'm already under The Chair of Peter.

Peter's first chair.

Forgive me...

 

[OrthodoxyUSA]

I will never... under any circumstances, submit to The Church of Rome.

I will burn in hell first.

To share in her communion would be to share in the violence and trouble she has caused in her history. I will not be party to that.

Forgive me...

 

[katherine2001]

Obviously, the Apostles, including St. Peter himself, did not see the primacy of Peter as him being over everyone else, since the first bishop of the Church was James. According to the RC teaching, shouldn't Peter have been the first bishop of the Church, which (of course) is the Church of Jerusalem.

 

[Rowan]

I'd be more than happy to commune with those who follow the Bishop of Rome...once the schism is healed. It's really that simple for me.

 

[WarriorAngel]

December 21, 2012 (if you believe the Mayan calendar hooplah).

O ok, i thot that was Dec 2012. :o
To which i dont believe...
But ya never know really.

We don't have any errors to "give up". The Orthodox would have to once again recognize, as the ECFs once did, that the unity of the Church is made manifest in the chair of Peter.

And as ALL the ECF's repeatedly and strongly reported ROME as the Chair of Peter.
And I am of course referring to the Eastern fathers at that.

 

[WarriorAngel]

I'd be more than happy to commune with those who follow the Bishop of Rome...once the schism is healed. It's really that simple for me.

As we would as well.

 

[WarriorAngel]

Obviously, the Apostles, including St. Peter himself, did not see the primacy of Peter as him being over everyone else, since the first bishop of the Church was James. According to the RC teaching, shouldn't Peter have been the first bishop of the Church, which (of course) is the Church of Jerusalem.

Do you read the Church fathers, per chance?
I am seeing alot of self interpretations in here to deny Rome of the chair of Peter.
That is a new found [probably infiltrated thru protestantism] idea.

 

[WarriorAngel]

I will never... under any circumstances, submit to The Church of Rome.

I will burn in hell first.

To share in her communion would be to share in the violence and trouble she has caused in her history. I will not be party to that.

Forgive me...

From your lips to God's ears.

 

[LittleLambofJesus]

I'd be more than happy to commune with those who follow the Bishop of Rome...once the schism is healed. It's really that simple for me.

Do the Orthodox have anything like Cardinals that are over the Bishops as the RCs do?

 

[WarriorAngel]

The old term was, i believe, legates.
And the Patriarchs have legates.

Unless i err.

 

[ScottBot]

One is of Peter, one is of Paul, but all in all we are One with Jesus.

http://www.scripture4all.org/

Jonah 3:1 And a word of YHWH is becoming unto Jonah, a second-time, to say, 2 `Rise! go! to Niyn@veh, the city, the great and call to her, the call which I am speaking to thee;'

Acts 9:15 Said yet toward him, the Lord , `Be you going!, that a vessel of choice is to Me this one,of the to bear the Name of Me in sight of nations and kings--sons besides of Israel;

I am of Christ, but I still recognize that Christ made the unity of the visible church manifest in Peter and none other.