You know futzman, if we all accepted the same past state as absolutely true, then there would be no question about your claims, the Big Whack, Big Bang or any of this. The fundamental issue is the veracity of the science's account of things, because it is based on a mythical past. If you accept it as absolutely true and many of us don't, then we can argue for eternity and never reach agreement.
So, rather than blather on, and argue, you need to pony up big time here, the evidence for your so called science. You need to erase all spiritual as well, and limit the debate to only the natural. You can't do that. So, no need to argue at all. You already lost.
I've already "ponyed-up" many times on this forum for my "so-called" science. My most recent post showed conclusively how mutation and random selection works to produce clocks from clock parts, refuting one of the lame argument Creationist/IDists use as a strawman to "debunk" evolution. I noticed you didn't even attempt to debate this very strong evidence. But, then again, that would require following a logical train of thought when yours has obviously been derailed.
As far as the spirtual realm goes I'm a very spirtual person. I stand in awe of nature and it's processes and my awe increases the more I learn. My spirtuality, however, just doesn't include, nor need, an invisible, mythical being.
Upvote
0