• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Moon was Created

dad

Undefeated!
Site Supporter
Jan 17, 2005
44,905
1,259
✟25,524.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Truth is not a democracy.
Sometimes a lot of people knowing you are not really as powerful as God is a good thing.

Put it this way: I see no reason to believe in these spirits you're talking about, over and above any reason there is to believe in the Underpants Gnomes.
OK, and I see no reason to believe in a same past state, the hot soup creator speck, or the Pond slime nonsense. That's OK. Since you have no science, belief really doesn't enter the picture much. We can safely chose the more tried and proven belief.



I can common as intelligently as I can about the Underpants Gnomes - and in both cases, the intelligent comment is that they don't exist.
Really? OK, let's see you comment intelligently on them.

Yoohooooo, I have already said that A) the truth is not dependent on how many people believe it and B) that no-one believes you anyway.
OK, so who believes me is what counts, according to you, and yet, truth does not depend on how many believe it. OK.

Stop deluding yourself that anyone agrees with you, and stop deluding yourself that it would actually matter if they did.
I am not deluding myself in any way. The only way it would matter id for them, not for what will be or what was. It might open their eyes that there is more going on than meets the eye here, and they might start to question authority, so called.
 
Upvote 0

FishFace

Senior Veteran
Jan 12, 2007
4,535
169
37
✟28,130.00
Faith
Atheist
Sometimes a lot of people knowing you are not really as powerful as God is a good thing.

Irrelevant. No reason to believe your claims.

OK, and I see no reason to believe in a same past state, the hot soup creator speck, or the Pond slime nonsense.

That's great. So you accept that without any good reason to believe, we shouldn't believe in stuff? So I shouldn't believe in the Underpants Gnomes or spirits or the Big Bang, unless there's a reason to?

Really? OK, let's see you comment intelligently on them.

There is no reason to believe they exist, so I don't believe they exist.

OK, so who believes me is what counts, according to you, and yet, truth does not depend on how many believe it. OK.

Please tell me where I said that "who believes you" counts for anything. I think you'll find I said you were wrong on TWO counts. The first count is that no-one does agree with you. The second is that even if they did, that wouldn't be any reason to believe you.

I am not deluding myself in any way.

:wave:
 
Upvote 0

AirPo

with a Touch of Grey
Oct 31, 2003
26,363
7,214
62
✟184,357.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
OK, here is your marching orders, Air.

Keep posting silly little fluffy airy posts about sweet nothing, so you make the 'views' count go up. That way, some might think something interesting is going on here, and read a bit, and learn something.

Keep up the good work, we all have a place.

OK, here is your marching orders, dad.

Keep posting silly little fluffy airy posts about sweet nothing so you make the 'views' count go up. That way, some might think something entertaining is going on here, and read a bit, and have a good laugh.

Keep up the good work, mabey some day you'll win a Hugo award.
 
Upvote 0

Frumious Bandersnatch

Contributor
Mar 4, 2003
6,390
334
79
Visit site
✟30,931.00
Faith
Unitarian
OK, here is your marching orders, dad.

Keep posting silly little fluffy airy posts about sweet nothing so you make the 'views' count go up. That way, some might think something entertaining is going on here, and read a bit, and have a good laugh.

Keep up the good work, mabey some day you'll win a Hugo award.
They do occasionally give Hugos for fantasy. I wonder is there is an award for best comedy writer on internet debate boards? Dad could certainly be winner if there is.
 
Upvote 0

Frumious Bandersnatch

Contributor
Mar 4, 2003
6,390
334
79
Visit site
✟30,931.00
Faith
Unitarian
I am not deluding myself in any way.
:D
You are deluding yourself into thinking that you are not deluding yourself. This is typical of the the self-deluded.

We can't convince you of the absurdity of your "no gravity before the flood", "1600 year geological column", "spirits living inside the earth and moon" and all your other delusions any more than Mortimer Brewster could convince Teddy Brewster that he wasn't Theodore Roosevelt. You just keep charging up the stairs blowing your bugle and shouting "different past!", "different past!".
 
Upvote 0

dad

Undefeated!
Site Supporter
Jan 17, 2005
44,905
1,259
✟25,524.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
:D :D :D People of sound mind don't think that Elvis might be living in a city of transparent gold inside the moon.
That's what you think. But, I suppose, why would you be expected to know?? Elvis was a believer, so he is quite alive, wherever heaven is.
 
Upvote 0

dad

Undefeated!
Site Supporter
Jan 17, 2005
44,905
1,259
✟25,524.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
:D
You are deluding yourself into thinking that you are not deluding yourself. This is typical of the the self-deluded.
Normally I would take your word on the depths of delusion, but you are projecting here.

We can't convince you of the absurdity of your "no gravity before the flood", "1600 year geological column", "spirits living inside the earth and moon" and all your other delusions any more than Mortimer Brewster could convince Teddy Brewster that he wasn't Theodore Roosevelt. You just keep charging up the stairs blowing your bugle and shouting "different past!", "different past!".

You could convince us all, if you had the slightest real evidence of your weird myth of a present state eternity. Wasn't it you that talked of expecting to be maggot food one day? Why you proceed to try and scream there is nothing more than the present physical, I have no idea. Are you really satisfied with your morbid little baseless claims, and philosophy that hands credit for creation to a fluke, and that has you being a lowly beast?
 
Upvote 0

dad

Undefeated!
Site Supporter
Jan 17, 2005
44,905
1,259
✟25,524.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
OK, here is your marching orders, dad.

Keep posting silly little fluffy airy posts about sweet nothing so you make the 'views' count go up. That way, some might think something entertaining is going on here, and read a bit, and have a good laugh.

Keep up the good work, mabey some day you'll win a Hugo award.
Hey, it didn't take you long to obey. I thought maybe you would try to never post again, so that I would look like my orders were not obeyed. Too late now.
 
Upvote 0

dad

Undefeated!
Site Supporter
Jan 17, 2005
44,905
1,259
✟25,524.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
That's great. So you accept that without any good reason to believe, we shouldn't believe in stuff? So I shouldn't believe in the Underpants Gnomes or spirits or the Big Bang, unless there's a reason to?
Maybe the gnome tooted, and caused the big bang?


There is no reason to believe they exist, so I don't believe they exist.
OK. What, you think I am supposed to force you to believe in the well known, tried and tested spiritual?? No. You need to make your own path there.



Please tell me where I said that "who believes you" counts for anything. I think you'll find I said you were wrong on TWO counts. The first count is that no-one does agree with you.
Well, how would you know that??? You neither know me, nor those I know?? Presumptuous, much???

The second is that even if they did, that wouldn't be any reason to believe you.
OK. So even if you are wrong in claiming baselessly that I am wrong, that is still not a good reason to say I am right, and you are wrong. Does that mean even when you are wrong, and admit it, you are right??
 
Upvote 0

FishFace

Senior Veteran
Jan 12, 2007
4,535
169
37
✟28,130.00
Faith
Atheist
Maybe the gnome tooted, and caused the big bang?

Answer the question: Is it correct that I shouldn't believe in stuff without reason?

OK. What, you think I am supposed to force you to believe in the well known, tried and tested spiritual?? No. You need to make your own path there.

Wrong again. It's not up to me to convince myself that I'm wrong. It's up to people who actually think I am wrong.
If it's tried and tested, give me a reason to believe it's tried and tested, and then give me a reason to believe that means there are spirits inside the earth.

Well, how would you know that?

Educated guess. But if you can prove me wrong and show the hordes of people who think there are spirits under the earth, go for it.

OK. So even if you are wrong in claiming baselessly that I am wrong, that is still not a good reason to say I am right, and you are wrong. Does that mean even when you are wrong, and admit it, you are right??

It means it doesn't matter how many people agree with you - that's not a reason to believe you.
 
Upvote 0

AirPo

with a Touch of Grey
Oct 31, 2003
26,363
7,214
62
✟184,357.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Hey, it didn't take you long to obey. I thought maybe you would try to never post again, so that I would look like my orders were not obeyed. Too late now.
Well it is your thread. But since you set the tone of meaningless fluff in this OP and others, your "orders" have been standing for years.
 
Upvote 0

dad

Undefeated!
Site Supporter
Jan 17, 2005
44,905
1,259
✟25,524.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Answer the question: Is it correct that I shouldn't believe in stuff without reason?
Depends on what stuff. For Christians, we have reasons for believing. If we have reasons to believe 90 things, and there are 92 things to believe, we can take a few by faith, that is OK. It isn't like making up false creation stories, and teaching it to kids. That is despicable.


Wrong again. It's not up to me to convince myself that I'm wrong. It's up to people who actually think I am wrong.
Well, you may be right about some things. Most are. That is why you need to put actual issues on the table if you want them discussed.


If it's tried and tested, give me a reason to believe it's tried and tested, and then give me a reason to believe that means there are spirits inside the earth.
To boil that all down, basically, you want a reason to believe there are spirits. People see them, and have seen them. Observation. Have you seen a nuclear reaction??? I haven't, yet I believe they occur, because some men have observed it. We also lost some cities because of it, and power cities, etc. Well, why not believe the people
that experienced spiritual things? People who received power from it?

Educated guess. But if you can prove me wrong and show the hordes of people who think there are spirits under the earth, go for it.
Well, I gave the link already for the cultures that recorded belief in an underworld. It is very very widespread.


It means it doesn't matter how many people agree with you - that's not a reason to believe you.
Sometimes it is an indication there may be something to it. Other times, it is meaningless. We need to know the difference.

I find it exotic, and interesting, that the foundations of the earth are forever. The possibility that similar materials were used for earth, as are used in New Jerusalem. I find it is a wonderful thing, that the meaningless, unproven, depressing, boring drivel taught to us about the moon, and universe, and earth might be totally wrong. Life is too short for that sort of thing.
 
Upvote 0

AirPo

with a Touch of Grey
Oct 31, 2003
26,363
7,214
62
✟184,357.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Great, and it was fun to whack around the big whack theory, and watch you not even be able to raise a peep. Those that push it, ought to hang their heads in shame.
But I'm not here to support the Big Whack Thoery. I'm here to support the HI Theory.
 
Upvote 0

Inan3

Veteran Saint
Jul 22, 2007
3,376
88
West of the Mississippi
✟27,875.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Word of Faith
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
If a man dies at 1000 years old, he will be considered a child then, so we have the thousand year lifespans back, it seems.

Yes, I would like scriptures on this.

In other words, they might live on all the way through to the end of the 1000 years. But not just lifespans are different, the growth rates in the millennium are also fast again! (if you need a verse on that, let me know)

And this ...especially return to 1000 year life spans and faster growth rates.

Now, I don't think it is in the bible, but I have also heard some say they had reasons to believe that the climate will be a lot better then to. I am pretty sure that the lion will lay with the lamb then as well. (unless that is all in New Jerusalem?) so, that means that the fast evolving is back again, I would surmise!!

Isa 11:6 The wolf also shall dwell with the lamb, and the leopard shall lie down with the kid; and the calf and the young lion and the fatling together; and a little child shall lead them.

This is the scripture that speaks of that but it is unclear when that will happen but it probably will be during His Millenial Reign because of what the verses before say. As to the climate being better, I don't know of any scriptures which speak of that but Rev 21:21-27 speak of the New Jerusalem which will not need the sun or the moon because the Lamb will be the light of it and nothing that defiles shall enter into it. That's the closest to a good climate as I can see.

Now, I'd have to look it up, but I seem to recall something about childbirth being easy again then as well?

1 Tim 2:15 speaks to that but it has nothing to do with the Millenial Reign

So, there is more than just healings going on, that's for sure then!!

Well it does not appear "sure" to me and I would prefer to have scriptural reference than conjecture when it comes to the things of God.

Don't get me wrong...I'm with you on a lot of what you have said but I prefer scriptural evidence. (I thought I'd throw that in considering the debate forum we are on.:D )
 
Upvote 0

FishFace

Senior Veteran
Jan 12, 2007
4,535
169
37
✟28,130.00
Faith
Atheist
Depends on what stuff. For Christians, we have reasons for believing.

Are they a secret then, or what?

Well, you may be right about some things. Most are. That is why you need to put actual issues on the table if you want them discussed.

Hey, you put the issue on the table already; whether or not spirits exist under the earth's surface. I say they don't, and eagerly await your reasoning saying that they do.

To boil that all down, basically, you want a reason to believe there are spirits. People see them, and have seen them. Observation.

People claim to have seen them. That means pretty much nothing. I want something a bit better than that.

Have you seen a nuclear reaction???

I have looked at the sun; therefore yes.

I haven't, yet I believe they occur, because some men have observed it. We also lost some cities because of it, and power cities, etc. Well, why not believe the people

In the case of nuclear reactions, we have photographs of the results, destroyed cities, radiation poisoning.
In the case of spirits we have none of this observable evidence.

Well, I gave the link already for the cultures that recorded belief in an underworld. It is very very widespread.

Back to school, dad. Today we're doing English, and the topic is tenses. It was very widespread. The Egyptian and Greek cultures, among others, were all about underworlds.
Nowadays, not so good.

Sometimes it is an indication there may be something to it. Other times, it is meaningless. We need to know the difference.

It might give a reason to look into it, but never a reason to believe. Never.

I find it exotic, and interesting, that the foundations of the earth are forever.

Evidence, please.
 
Upvote 0

dad

Undefeated!
Site Supporter
Jan 17, 2005
44,905
1,259
✟25,524.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Yes, I would like scriptures on this.
A typo there, in case you didn't notice. It was if a man dies at a hundred, he will be considered a child in the millennium. (not 1000)
Isa 65:20 - There shall be no more thence an infant of days, nor an old man that hath not filled his days: for the child shall die anhundred years old ; but the sinner being an hundred years old shall be accursed.

And this ...especially return to 1000 year life spans and faster growth rates.
The tree of life grows fruit every month. Also, in the millennium, look at how a bit of corn, even at high elevations will grow!!!


Ps 72:16 -There shall be an handful of corn in the earth upon the top of the mountains; the fruit thereof shall shake like Lebanon: and they of the city shall flourish like grass of the earth. "...a "handful" (or literally, "a piece," or small portion) of corn in the most unpropitious locality, shall produce a crop, waving in the wind in its luxuriant growth, like the forests of Lebanon. "
http://www.studylight.org/com/jfb/view.cgi?book=ps&chapter=72&verse=16#Ps72_16





Isa 11:6 The wolf also shall dwell with the lamb, and the leopard shall lie down with the kid; and the calf and the young lion and the fatling together; and a little child shall lead them.

This is the scripture that speaks of that but it is unclear when that will happen but it probably will be during His Millenial Reign because of what the verses before say.

Isa 11:7 - And the cow and the bear shall feed; their young ones shall lie down together: and the lion shall eat straw like the ox.
Isa 65:25 -The wolf and the lamb shall feed together, and the lion shall eat straw like the bullock: and dust shall be the serpent's meat. They shall not hurt nor destroy in all my holy mountain, saith the LORD.
As to the climate being better, I don't know of any scriptures which speak of that but Rev 21:21-27 speak of the New Jerusalem which will not need the sun or the moon because the Lamb will be the light of it and nothing that defiles shall enter into it. That's the closest to a good climate as I can see.
If we have great growing conditons at high elevatins, the climate of the earth has to be different!! Now, ir we also moderate the climate in the low places, why, we have climate control, no less!!

Isa 35:1 The wilderness and the solitary place shall be glad for them; and the desert shall rejoice, and blossom as the rose. 2 It shall blossom abundantly, and rejoice even with joy and singing: the glory of Lebanon shall be given unto it

6 Then shall the lame man leap as an hart, and the tongue of the dumb sing: for in the wilderness shall waters break out, and streams in the desert. 7 And the parched ground shall become a pool, and the thirsty land springs of water: in the habitation of dragons, where each lay, shall be grass [SIZE=-1][/SIZE]with reeds and rushes




1 Tim 2:15 speaks to that but it has nothing to do with the Millenial Reign
Well, that is part of the curse. It sure sounds like the curse is somewhat lifted in the millennium. And, of course, as the new heavens get here, it is gone.

Re 22:3 - And there shall be no more curse:
 
Upvote 0

dad

Undefeated!
Site Supporter
Jan 17, 2005
44,905
1,259
✟25,524.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Are they a secret then, or what?
No, like the resurrection. Very well witnessed, and known. The presence of God in many of our lives is well known by us. The peace that passes understanding, the gifts we all seem to get, the provision, protection, and fulfilled prophesies, inner changes, etc etc. It is no secret, what God has done. It was not, and is not done in a closet.


Hey, you put the issue on the table already; whether or not spirits exist under the earth's surface. I say they don't, and eagerly await your reasoning saying that they do.
Well, what reason can man have, that can't even see spirits on the surface?? You must leave it unknown. Work according to your abilities.
Those that believe the bible can know from that.

Php 2:10 - That at the name of Jesus every knee should bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth;

Re 5:3 - And no man in heaven, nor in earth, neither under the earth, was able to open the book, neither to look thereon.

Re 5:13 - And every creature which is in heaven, and on the earth, and under the earth, and such as are in the sea, and all that are in them, heard I saying, Blessing, and honour, and glory, and power, be unto him that sitteth upon the throne, and unto the Lamb for ever and ever.
I don't make this stuff up.

People claim to have seen them. That means pretty much nothing. I want something a bit better than that.
Ask God, who knows, maybe you will get some peeks? If not, maybe at least some inner realizations.



I have looked at the sun; therefore yes.
OK, and so the reactions take place on the part of the sun we see with our naked eyes, according to you. Fine. I would urge caution there, I heard it was best never to look directly at the sun.

In the case of nuclear reactions, we have photographs of the results, destroyed cities, radiation poisoning.
Well, in the case of angels busting apostles out of the clink, and the resurrection, and feeding thousands with a few loaves and fishes, there were no cameras yet. Many have drawn it, though.

In the case of spirits we have none of this observable evidence.
That tells us they operate outside our observation sphere at the moment. Our fishbowl. You will have to come to grips with that, it is pretty basic.

Back to school, dad. Today we're doing English, and the topic is tenses. It was very widespread. The Egyptian and Greek cultures, among others, were all about underworlds.
Nowadays, not so good.
No, millions and millions believe in spirits under the earth in the Christian world alone.

It might give a reason to look into it, but never a reason to believe. Never.
The expansion of space, as perceived by science at least, is an indication of some things. As you point out, not a reason to believe. Neither is running a computer simulation backwards, every which way, to cook up the big whack creation of the moon a reason to believe. Neither is some modest evolving a reason to say it started in the Pond.




Evidence, please.[/quote]
 
Upvote 0