SallyNow
Blame it on the SOCK GNOMES!
This is amusing:
Nearly every family in my parish is considered "large" by today's standards, I live in an area of the country where it is supposively almost impossible to raise a large family, and yet none of these families are living in poverty. Still, I guess that my experience is inapplicable. It is some fluke that people like my priest can support a wife, 8 children and an elderly mother on an average salary, without going into poverty.
Yes, it is a fluke. Just like the fact that I was friends with several pairs of twins when I was a child, and that I know several people with Asberger's, etc.
Is your experience innapplicable? No. But it is a fluke. There are millions of families out there to prove it. You know some of the exceptions.
There are much more complicated issues at work here. Yes, your priest is managing well. But I doubt you know his full financial situation, and I doubt you realize what a fluke he really is. It is probably due to hard work and good luck, but not everyone is blessed with that good luck.
There are too many families out there that live in poverty and pain and live in fear of where their next meal is going to come from to advocate everyone having a large family.
And as much as many people would like to believe that every woman has problems concieving, that just isn't so. There are many women who get pregnant at the drop of a hat. In this culture, women only breastfeed for about a year. That's not very long compared to others.
Another factor is that, yes, there are well-adjusted kids out there who came from huge families. But there are also many who don't.
There is nothing wrong with having "only" two or three children. Some people feel they can handle more when they really, really can't. It is more destructive than it is good. At least some people are honest enough to admit that they couldn't properly handle a dozen kids.
As for somehow blaming this on working women, well, I hate to break it, but women have always worked. The home used to be the centre of industry, and women helped create and support and nurish industry. Now, though, industry has moved out of the home - and with it, moving women out of the home, too. It seems like most "women belong at home" sites are filled with busywork for bored women, rather than nurishing a woman's need to work, whether it be volunteering at the local soup kitchen or being the country's top lawyer.
The reason big families no longer work is simple: big families used to be necessary because so many children died in early childhood. Yes, a woman may have given birth to twelve children, and then ended up perhaps raising only six to adulthood. And let us not forget how many children were put to work at early ages, with no education, to support families!
History isn't pretty. It's not the idealized big family. Yes, some today are able to have a wonderful huge family, but most people are not. Some are able to be world-class runners, but most aren't. Is it better to admit you won't ever make to the Olympics, but that you may make it to your local marathon, and train in reasonable manner, or better you go for broke and end up, well, broken?
And that doesn't even address the issue that birth control also helps many women live healthier, less painful lives, lives where they aren't cooped up in the house for days at a time each month in severe pain.
Contraception should not be used as an excuse for sex with everyone, all the time. But it should be used as a tool to help women, to help families, live healthy, safe, and productive lives.
Upvote
0