• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

What is the age of the Earth?

What is the age of the Earth?

  • I am Catholic/Orthodox. I believe in an old Earth.

  • I am Catholic/Orthodox. I believe in a young Earth.

  • I am protestant. I believe in an old Earth.

  • I am protestant. I believe in a young Earth.


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.

rmwilliamsll

avid reader
Mar 19, 2004
6,006
334
✟7,946.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Green
so how old would the steel be in my car, will it be the same date as my car? No....Its an example
google and see how you could date the steel in your car.
what are the potential radioactive elements that would be in the steel?
what are the potential daughter and parent elements?
does refining and/or processing the steel change these ratios?

you seem to believe that you can pick up a single atom and date it, however this is not a proper way to imagine radioactive dating. perhaps the best thing to do is start at the beginning and read:
http://www.asa3.org/aSA/resources/Wiens.html

and get the potential scientific background to intelligently discuss the issue.
 
Upvote 0

simplyg123

Well-Known Member
Dec 5, 2006
747
26
Naples Florida
✟23,488.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
An example of what?
how can you say a the earth is 4 billion years old based on a minute particle in the earth.

what if your right the rock was that old, what if God created the rock to play with and got bored with it after 4 billion years?
 
Upvote 0

rmwilliamsll

avid reader
Mar 19, 2004
6,006
334
✟7,946.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Green
how can you say a the earth is 4 billion years old based on a minute particle in the earth.

for this topic see an excellent recent article in SciAm at:
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=0006AA6A-9D17-1C75-9B81809EC588EF21
the dating game

or this one on zircons in Australia:
http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?articleID=0005FA5D-5F7C-1333-9F7C83414B7F0000

i have new hairs growing all the time if you figure the date of them to be 12 days, am i an infant?

a false and misleading metaphor or analog to radioactive dating. you would have more credibility if you would take some time and read the links given above for your edification.
 
Upvote 0

Melethiel

Miserere mei, Domine
Site Supporter
Jun 8, 2005
27,287
940
35
Ohio
✟99,593.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
i have new hairs growing all the time if you figure the date of them to be 12 days, am i an infant?
These are all complete strawman. Please, read up on the science and methods used in dating before making such arguments.
 
Upvote 0

KerrMetric

Well-Known Member
Oct 2, 2005
5,171
226
64
Pasadena, CA
✟6,671.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
how can you say a the earth is 4 billion years old based on a minute particle in the earth.

what if your right the rock was that old, what if God created the rock to play with and got bored with it after 4 billion years?


This has just become embarrassing.
 
Upvote 0

simplyg123

Well-Known Member
Dec 5, 2006
747
26
Naples Florida
✟23,488.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
the method of dating is not the point, the point is a rock, a pepple, a minute piece of the earth.

You folks are very educated i grant you that.

my percentage may be wrong, but i believe only 10 percent of the earth is Land or rock?

why is this little bit of evidence the back bone
 
Upvote 0

pgp_protector

Noted strange person
Dec 17, 2003
51,896
17,799
57
Earth For Now
Visit site
✟462,471.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Others
the method of dating is not the point, the point is a rock, a pepple, a minute piece of the earth.

You folks are very educated i grant you that.

my percentage may be wrong, but i believe only 10 percent of the earth is Land or rock?

why is this little bit of evidence the back bone
So what's the other 90% of earth ?
 
Upvote 0

Melethiel

Miserere mei, Domine
Site Supporter
Jun 8, 2005
27,287
940
35
Ohio
✟99,593.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
the method of dating is not the point, the point is a rock, a pepple, a minute piece of the earth.

The method of dating IS the point, because by focusing on the "pebble" issue, you are completely missing the point of radioactive dating. The important thing is not the pebble, but what is in it.

Most of the earth is made up of rock and metal, just at varying temperatures...
 
Upvote 0

rmwilliamsll

avid reader
Mar 19, 2004
6,006
334
✟7,946.00
Faith
Calvinist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Green
the method of dating is not the point, the point is a rock, a pepple, a minute piece of the earth.

You folks are very educated i grant you that.

my percentage may be wrong, but i believe only 10 percent of the earth is Land or rock?

why is this little bit of evidence the back bone
read the SciAm article on zircons referred above. it will go a long ways towards helping you understand the issues.
 
Upvote 0

KerrMetric

Well-Known Member
Oct 2, 2005
5,171
226
64
Pasadena, CA
✟6,671.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
the method of dating is not the point, the point is a rock, a pepple, a minute piece of the earth.

Huh? Do you know the concept of setting upper and lower limits?

You folks are very educated i grant you that.

Think on that for a second.

my percentage may be wrong, but i believe only 10 percent of the earth is Land or rock?

Huh? What's is the rest? Green cheese?
 
Upvote 0

pgp_protector

Noted strange person
Dec 17, 2003
51,896
17,799
57
Earth For Now
Visit site
✟462,471.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Widowed
Politics
US-Others
Upvote 0

KerrMetric

Well-Known Member
Oct 2, 2005
5,171
226
64
Pasadena, CA
✟6,671.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
water,a molten mass, and unknown (no-one has seen it or sampled it)

Not true. And we know how to check this. You don't need to see something to measure it and figure out its properties.

No one has ever "seen" gravity. No one has ever "seen" an electron.

You can figure out the Earth's internal structure without giong there.
 
Upvote 0

calidog

Veteran
Nov 1, 2005
916
56
shhhhhh
✟1,986.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
That's what I'm wondering ?

Though I guess you could go with molten Iron, Magma, Ect... (unless you go with some that say the earth is hollow)

Not true. And we know how to check this. You don't need to see something to measure it and figure out its properties.

No one has ever "seen" gravity. No one has ever "seen" an electron.

You can figure out the Earth's internal structure without giong there.
Seismic (spelling?) and ultrasounding have been performed. Don't know what good that'll really do.
 
Upvote 0

simplyg123

Well-Known Member
Dec 5, 2006
747
26
Naples Florida
✟23,488.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
  • Inner core: 1.7% of the Earth's mass; depth of 5,150-6,370 kilometers (3,219 - 3,981 miles)
    The inner core is solid and unattached to the mantle, suspended in the molten outer core. It is believed to have solidified as a result of pressure-freezing which occurs to most liquids when temperature decreases or pressure increases.
  • Outer core: 30.8% of Earth's mass; depth of 2,890-5,150 kilometers (1,806 - 3,219 miles)
    The outer core is a hot, electrically conducting liquid within which convective motion occurs. This conductive layer combines with Earth's rotation to create a dynamo effect that maintains a system of electrical currents known as the Earth's magnetic field. It is also responsible for the subtle jerking of Earth's rotation. This layer is not as dense as pure molten iron, which indicates the presence of lighter elements. Scientists suspect that about 10% of the layer is composed of sulfur and/or oxygen because these elements are abundant in the cosmos and dissolve readily in molten iron.
  • D": 3% of Earth's mass; depth of 2,700-2,890 kilometers (1,688 - 1,806 miles)
    This layer is 200 to 300 kilometers (125 to 188 miles) thick and represents about 4% of the mantle-crust mass. Although it is often identified as part of the lower mantle, seismic discontinuities suggest the D" layer might differ chemically from the lower mantle lying above it. Scientists theorize that the material either dissolved in the core, or was able to sink through the mantle but not into the core because of its density.
  • Lower mantle: 49.2% of Earth's mass; depth of 650-2,890 kilometers (406 -1,806 miles)
    The lower mantle contains 72.9% of the mantle-crust mass and is probably composed mainly of silicon, magnesium, and oxygen. It probably also contains some iron, calcium, and aluminum. Scientists make these deductions by assuming the Earth has a similar abundance and proportion of cosmic elements as found in the Sun and primitive meteorites.
  • Transition region: 7.5% of Earth's mass; depth of 400-650 kilometers (250-406 miles)
    The transition region or mesosphere (for middle mantle), sometimes called the fertile layer, contains 11.1% of the mantle-crust mass and is the source of basaltic magmas. It also contains calcium, aluminum, and garnet, which is a complex aluminum-bearing silicate mineral. This layer is dense when cold because of the garnet. It is buoyant when hot because these minerals melt easily to form basalt which can then rise through the upper layers as magma.
  • Upper mantle: 10.3% of Earth's mass; depth of 10-400 kilometers (6 - 250 miles)
    The upper mantle contains 15.3% of the mantle-crust mass. Fragments have been excavated for our observation by eroded mountain belts and volcanic eruptions. Olivine (Mg,Fe)2SiO4 and pyroxene (Mg,Fe)SiO3 have been the primary minerals found in this way. These and other minerals are refractory and crystalline at high temperatures; therefore, most settle out of rising magma, either forming new crustal material or never leaving the mantle. Part of the upper mantle called the asthenosphere might be partially molten.
  • Oceanic crust: 0.099% of Earth's mass; depth of 0-10 kilometers (0 - 6 miles)
    The oceanic crust contains 0.147% of the mantle-crust mass. The majority of the Earth's crust was made through volcanic activity. The oceanic ridge system, a 40,000-kilometer (25,000 mile) network of volcanoes, generates new oceanic crust at the rate of 17 km3 per year, covering the ocean floor with basalt. Hawaii and Iceland are two examples of the accumulation of basalt piles.
  • Continental crust: 0.374% of Earth's mass; depth of 0-50 kilometers (0 - 31 miles).
    The continental crust contains 0.554% of the mantle-crust mass. This is the outer part of the Earth composed essentially of crystalline rocks. These are low-density buoyant minerals dominated mostly by quartz (SiO2) and feldspars (metal-poor silicates). The crust (both oceanic and continental) is the surface of the Earth; as such, it is the coldest part of our planet. Because cold rocks deform slowly, we refer to this rigid outer shell as the lithosphere (the rocky or strong layer).
Source:http://www.solarviews.com/eng/earthint.htm


Now since i am so scientifically stupid educate me to which of these you use for dating the earth
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.